How completely deranged and dishonest is the left you ask?

Most Americans make the mistake of believing that the political left in America are normal rational people, just like them. The problem is, that it just isn’t the case. The Progressive liberal Marxist Democrat left in America genuinely are suffering from serious and profound mental disorders. In short, they really genuinely are fucking nut’s.

How fucking nut’s you ask? The most eloquent display of their psychosis can be found in their constant accusations that the political right, specifically Tea Party conservatives are the American equivalent of the Taliban or ISIS. You honestly have to be 100 percent certifiably insane to make that suggestion even as a politically motivated joke.

This is ISIS in action, tell me where you have seen this anywhere in America from the right side of the political isle.

So… Where are the mass graves caused by the American Tea Party killing 1500 liberals at a time? Which of America’s river’s are running red with blood as hundreds of bodies of liberal Marxist Democrats float down them?

Yes, if you call someone in America whom you disagree with politically a terrorist, you are clinically insane, absolutely certifiably psychotic and you should be placed in a psychiatric hospital for observation for your own safety as well as fore the safety of society.

The Department on Injustice tells Congress to fuck off.

Go to the 4:25 mark and start watching there. Republican Rep. Ron DeSantis asks James Cole, deputy attorney general in the Department of Justice, why after Congress held Lois Lerner in contempt that the DOJ, who is required by Law, has not begun prosecuting Lerner. Cole respond by telling DeSantis that the Department of Injustice has decided to exercise prosecutorial discretion. In other words, Cole told Congress to fuck off they weren’t going to prosecute Lois Lerner and there isn’t a damned thing Congress can do about it.

The smidgens have come home to roost…

The not so Reverend Jeremiah Wright once presumed to proclaim that America’s Chickens were coming home to roost, now it appears that Barack Obama’s smidgen’s are instead coming home to roost.

The Lerner Files: “smidgens upon smidgens” of corruption

Do you remember way back in February when the President said that not only was there not massive corruption in the IRS scandal, but not even a smidgen of corruption? Ah… good times, my friends. This weekend I highly recommend that you check out a piece by Ed Rogers, writing at the Washington Post, with the amusing title, More IRS smidgens show up. ‘Perfect.’

Anyone paying attention to the Internal Revenue Service scandal has been waiting for the next smidgen to drop. Well, two more hit pretty hard this week. At the president’s next encounter with the media, I will scream collusion if no one asks him for his exact definition of a “smidgen,” and if he thinks he has seen a smidgen of corruption yet. At this point, only the most gullible or culpable can continue to claim there is no compelling evidence in this case. Given the delays, lies and stonewalling, there is no viable argument against a special prosecutor.

The two items in question are ones which we’ve already discussed here. One – perhaps the most damning in recent months – was the shocking (meaning, not shocking) revelation that Lerner had previously told her co-workers that, “we need to be cautious about what we say in emails” and wanted to know if instant messaging texts were recorded.

The second was the oh-so-understandable “misunderstanding” about whether or not she had printed out any of her e-mails. And let’s face it… who can be sure what was meant when somebody asks you if you printed something? Did they mean “print” the documents, or print print the documents? It’s all terribly confusing.

First we hear that U.S. District Judge Emmet G. Sullivan has ordered the IRS to testify under oath regarding exactly what transpired regarding the destruction of Lois Lerner’s emails. Justice Sullivan is no one to toy with, he is as demanding and fearless as they come. I think it is a fair prediction to make that someone is going to testify before him and the result is that someone is going to end up going to prison as a consequence of that testimony.

Federal judge orders IRS to explain lost Lerner emails ‘under oath’

A federal judge has ordered the IRS to explain “under oath” how the agency lost a trove of emails from the official at the heart of the Tea Party targeting scandal.

U.S. District Judge Emmet G. Sullivan gave the tax agency 30 days to file a declaration by an “appropriate official” to address the computer issues with ex-official Lois Lerner.

The decision came Thursday as part of a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit by conservative watchdog group Judicial Watch, which along with GOP lawmakers on Capitol Hill has questioned how the IRS lost the emails and, in some cases, had no apparent way to retrieve them.

Now we are hearing that another Federal Judge wants in on the action, it would seem that U.S. District Judge Reggie B. Walton smells blood in the water. While considering this information, remember that it took quiet a while for Watergate to come up to speed and force Richard Nixon from office.

Second federal judge wants info on lost IRS emails

WASHINGTON — A second federal judge has ordered the IRS to provide information about lost emails from a central figure in the agency’s tea party controversy.

U.S. District Judge Reggie B. Walton said Friday he wants to know whatever became of Lois Lerner’s computer hard drive. IRS officials say Lerner’s computer crashed in 2011, destroying an untold number of emails.

At the time, Lerner headed the IRS division that processes applications for tax-exempt status. She has since retired.

IRS Commissioner John Koskinen has told Congress that Lerner’s hard drive was recycled and presumably destroyed. If that’s the case, Walton said he wants a sworn affidavit saying so by the end of next week.

Walton also wants information about the IRS inspector general’s investigation into the lost emails.

Walton spoke at a hearing Friday in a lawsuit by a conservative group against the IRS. True the Vote, which says it advocates for the integrity of elections, sued the IRS over delays in its application for tax-exempt status.

Walton’s order came a day after another federal judge ordered the IRS to explain under oath how it lost the emails. U.S. District Judge Emmet G. Sullivan, who issued his order on Thursday, gave the tax agency a month to submit the explanation in writing.

When we throw into this now toxic mix former Alaska Governor Sarah Palin publicly calling for Obama’s impeachment it would seem that the situation might very well be getting drastic for Obama.

Palin makes the case for impeaching Obama

Her op-ed earlier this week focused on immigration. Today’s op-ed is a more comprehensive indictment, starting with the case that “high crimes and misdemeanors” includes dereliction of duty, not just statutory crimes.

I want to quote this part:

Impeachment is the ultimate check on an out-of-control executive branch. It is serious, not to be used for petty partisan purposes; and it is imperative that it becomes a matter of legitimate discussion before the American people lose all trust in our federal government.

Impeachment requires moral courage to advance what is right, and it requires political will. A complacent or disheartened electorate may silently endure these abuses from the administration, the permanent political class is only too happy to maintain the status quo, and the mainstream media is not a fair watchdog. So, the nation’s last line of defense is for We the People to rise up and say, “enough is enough.”…

Some argue that at best the House might vote for articles of impeachment, but the Senate is unlikely to convict. But that is no argument against holding a president accountable and sending the people’s message to all successors…

The only thing necessary to transform America into something unrecognizable is for good men to do nothing! If not these violations and the president’s promise to continue to “go it alone” in ignoring the separation of powers and rule of law, what will it take for you to take a stand? How bad does it have to get?

Ultimately, she’s saying, this all comes down to public outrage, which is exactly right — but that’s why there’s going to be no impeachment. Right? If the wider public shared her many objections to Obama — power grabs, amnesty, ObamaCare, NSA spying, Benghazi, the Bergdahl prisoner swap — his job approval would be in single digits. As it is, he’s at 41 percent, which is poor but not nearly so atrociously bad that any congressional Democrats would feel compelled to remove him from office. Even among the 54-55 percent who disapprove of his job performance, there are bound to be loads of people who think that he’s guilty of nothing more than incompetence, not dereliction of duty worthy of the first successful forcible ouster of the president in American history. I haven’t seen any polls on impeachment lately, but I’d guess that impeachment supporters would start with something like 55-60 percent of the public opposed (all Democrats and a majority of indies) and 40 percent or so in favor (most Republicans). Once the media went to work on “GOP extremism,” Democrats started rolling out talking points about how the “party of no” isn’t interested in real solutions for the middle class, and a few centrist Republicans in Congress publicly expressed opposition, it’d probably move another 10 points against. What then?

Which no doubt explains Eric Holder’s reaction to Palin calling for Obama’s Impeachment. Eric would of course lose any possibility of receiving a Presidential Pardon for his role in the IRS scandal as well as his part in “Operation Fast and Furious”. Yes, Eric Holder has plenty of reason to attack Sarah Palin, since he is neck deep in trouble himself.

Eric Holder: Palin Wasn’t a Good VP Candidate, Even Worse Judge of Who Should Be Impeached

Attorney General Eric Holder is challenging Republicans who are calling for his and President Obama’s impeachment, and denouncing what he calls a “gridlocked Washington” stalled by what he says is a Republican Party bent on blocking any of the administration’s efforts.

“For whatever reason, [some] Republicans decided early on that this was a president they were just simply not going to cooperate with,” Holder said in a rare interview with ABC News’ Pierre Thomas. “And over the past five-and-a-half years, we have seen demonstrations of that, where the president has reached out his hand, offered compromises that have simply not been met [in the way] they have been in the past by a Republican Party willing to do the appropriate things.”

Administration efforts to pass comprehensive immigration reform, for example, have failed. Asked about calls by Sarah Palin to impeach Obama over the administration’s immigration policies, Holder said: “She wasn’t a particularly good vice presidential candidate. She’s an even worse judge of who ought to be impeached and why.”

Holder similarly dismissed calls for himself to be impeached for declining to appoint a special prosecutor to investigate the IRS scandal. Holder insisted that a special prosecutor isn’t necessary, with “career people” and FBI agents “doing a good, professional job” investigating the matter.

Things are starting to look as if they could take a really bad turn for the Obamanation Administration and Obama’s various cronies. Obama and company apparently never learned anything from the Nixon or Clinton scandals, in the end, it come down to this. It’s the cover up stupid.

Hat Tip to Hot Air’s partsnlabor for the phrase “The smidgens have come home to roost…”

Tonights episode is titled, Contrasting Insanities

Were Rod Serling still alive we might have opened this like this.

“Tonights episode is titled, Contrasting Insanities.”

Maryland Gov. Martin O’Malley attempted to chastise American’s opposing illegal immigration with the following statement. “We are not a country that should turn children away and send them back to certain death”. It should under no circumstances be forgotten or obfuscated that the primary driving justification by both the Democrat and Republican Parties for “Immigration Reform” is that in order for America to maintain an acceptable employee pool, we need to increase our available worker numbers. This, both party leaderships insist is only possible by increasing our number of immigrants.

Now contrast that logic with the fact that since 1973’s infamous Roe v Wade ruling America has murdered over 50 million of her own children. No, Martin O’Malley is correct, we are not a country that should turn children away and send them back to certain death, clearly we much prefer to kill them right here.

There are approximately 18 million American’s who would like to work, but cannot find work. So obviously the only rational solution is, to import more immigrants to increase to pool of available workers, who already cannot find work. During World War 1 something strange took place. It is commonly known as “The Great Migration”. As nearly half a million American dough-boys went off to fight in Europe, American employers found themselves faced with a worker shortage, as the war was taking place in Europe, the traditional avenue of Immigrate had likewise dried up.

So American employers were forced to consider a existing but ignored source of manpower. The Great Migration refers to the incredibly high number of African Americans who moved from the Southern States to Northern States to provide America’s manufacturing industry with the labor it needed. They flowed into Pittsburgh, Chicago and Detroit by the millions to work in the Steel and Automotive industries. Today 18 million plus American’s cant find work, and the Republican and Democrat party leaderships solution to that problem, is to increase the number of immigrants by any means conceivable.

We murder our own children by the tens of millions, have tens of millions more who would love to work, if they could find work, our so called leaders insist that we are suffering a catastrophic worker shortage that can only be solved by a massive new wave of immigration.

Contrasting Insanities indeed.

How can you tell when a fascist wannabe has smoked to much crack?

MSLSD imbecile Michael Eric Dyson has officially gone on record as having smoked way to much crack while simultaneously taking way to much LSD. This lunatic imbecile is, by the way, a professor of sociology at Georgetown University, and you wonder why America college kids are so damned stupid these days.

Unhinged MSNBC Host: Sarah Palin Made ‘Treasonous Accusations’ Against Obama

MSNBC host Michael Eric Dyson on Wednesday lashed out at Sarah Palin, accusing the conservative of committing “treason” against Barack Obama by calling for the President’s impeachment. The guest host of the Ed Show first praised the President for “his tireless effort to help [illegal children who have crossed the border].” Dyson then fumed, “The President’s push towards positive and crucial change was met with treasonous accusations.” [See video below. MP3 audio here.]

During the last administration, however, Dyson called for the impeachment of George W. Bush. In a highly edited clip of Palin on Fox News, the Republican insisted, “Impeachment is a message that has to be sent to our President that we’re not going to put up with lawlessness… I really want Congress to do its job, the constitutional power that they have to halt an imperial presidency.”

During the Bush administration, Michael Eric Dyson was a signer to this petition:

The Call to Drive Out the Bush Regime

YOUR GOVERNMENT, on the basis of outrageous lies, is waging a murderous and utterly illegitimate war in Iraq, with other countries in their sights.

…

YOUR GOVERNMENT enforces a culture of greed, bigotry, intolerance and ignorance.

…

People look at all this and think of Hitler – and they are right to do so. The Bush regime is setting out to radically remake society very quickly, in a fascist way, and for generations to come. We must act now; the future is in the balance.

…

We need more than fighting Bush’s outrages one at a time, constantly losing ground to the whole onslaught. We must, and can, aim to create a political situation where the Bush regime’s program is repudiated, where Bush himself is driven from office.

According to Dyson’s own logic, aren’t these “treasonous accusations?” (Of course, it should be pointed out that “treason” is commited against a country, not a president.)

Dyson’s former colleague, Keith Olbermann, also called for Bush’s impeachment. On September 4, 2007, he raged, “Mr. Bush, our presence in Iraq must end, even if it means your resignation, even if it means your impeachment.”

So, not only has Dyson put on public display an amazing ignorance of the United States Constitution, a complete inability to employ rational or logical thought, but a degree of hypocrisy that is monumental. If Georgetown University were a public corporation, like say, Mozilla, this kind of arrogant narcissistic stupidity would potentially result in Dyson finding himself unemployed, which would clearly result in an elevation of the aggregate IQ of Georgetown University students.

Article III, Section 3 of some little-used document known as the Constitution:

“Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.

The Congress shall have Power to declare the Punishment of Treason, but no Attainder of Treason shall work Corruption of Blood, or Forfeiture except during the Life of the Person attainted.”

18 U.S. Code § 2381 – Treason

Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.

What could go wrong?

It’s a simple enough question, and yet, even so, when it comes to various political issues, it never seems to get asked. Often, it doesn’t get asked, because the obvious answers are answers that those pushing various issues do not want to happen, regardless of how likely those outcomes might be.

When the Whitehouse and Lois Lerner both failed to get an individual through confirmation hearing that Lois Lerner and the Whitehouse needed to be able to target TEA Party groups for political reasons, Lois took the insanely unprecedented action of targeting a sitting Senator for legal attack. Apparently not one single time did it occur to either Lois nor anyone in the Obama Administration to ask, “What could possible go wrong”.

Report: Lerner Targeted Grassley After He Blocked Obama Nominee She Needed To Help Prosecute Conservatives…

Hmm, I’m beginning to think this scandal isn’t as “phony” as Obama’s been claiming.

Via Daily Caller:

Ex-Internal Revenue Service official Lois Lerner tried to audit Republican Sen. Chuck Grassley after Grassley blocked President Obama’s nominee to head the Department of Justice (DOJ) tax division, an executive branch insider told The Daily Caller.

Grassley made it more difficult for the IRS and DOJ to work together to target conservative groups by blocking Obama’s political appointee Mary L. Smith from taking over the DOJ Tax Division, which prosecutes criminal cases for the IRS. Grassley held up the nomination in early 2010, just as Lerner and fellow IRS officials were mapping out their targeting strategy. The White House later withdrew Smith’s nomination.

The source confirmed to The Daily Caller that the White House and IRS officials “were very upset at Senator Grassley and Republicans for blocking a vote on Mary Smith’s nomination.”

The IRS relies on the DOJ Tax Division to prosecute both criminal and civil cases, and has entire legal teams devoted to making DOJ referrals. Placing a political appointee as assistant attorney general for the DOJ Tax Division was a top priority for the Obama White House.

Grassley made sure that no Obama political nominee got confirmed for the post, and kept in a “career,” or non-political, DOJ tax head for another two years.

The IRS claims that incriminating emails that most likely incriminate the Obama Whitehouse were accidentally destroyed when Lois Lerner’s hard drive crashed, over 70%% of American’s straight up believe that the IRS is lying and that they intentionally destroyed those emails.

Most Americans believe IRS destroyed subpoenaed emails to obstruct investigation

Most Americans believe somebody at the IRS deliberately destroyed nearly two years’ worth of subpoenaed emails in an attempt to obstruct the congressional investigation of the tax agency’s illegal targeting of Tea Party and conservative nonprofit applicants, according to a new Rasmussen survey.

Seventy-one percent of respondents say they don’t believe IRS claims that a mysterious computer crash destroyed emails to and from Lois Lerner and other high-ranking colleagues and officials outside of the agency.

Rather, the survey found, respondents think the agency deliberately destroyed the emails as part of a cover-up.

The poll, which was conducted from June 26-27, also found that two of three respondents also believe that the IRS officials involved in the scandal should either be jailed or fired.

Approximately 53 percent of respondents say they believe the IRS knowingly broke the law when improperly targeted conservative groups applying for tax-exempt status.

That is a four-point increase from earlier this year, pushing the number of people who suspect wrongdoing on the IRS’ part back to September 2013 levels.

“Little changed from the early surveys are the 22% who think the IRS did not break the law. Slightly more (25%) are not sure,” Rasmussen said.

Further, a plurality of respondents said they believe the targeting scandal occurred because the IRS was looking out for President Obama.

This is a level of blatant and in your face corruption that has never before existed in The United States of America, it’s what you expect of a third rate failed Banana Republic like Zimbabwe or Haiti, not the United States of America. Yet it is exactly where we find ourselves today.

Is there no one in this once great republic both capable and willing to stand up and say, enough is enough? Maybe, maybe we are about to find out.

BREAKING: Meet Emmet Sullivan, IRS Judge Who Once Sicced a Special Prosecutor on DOJ

Americans are appalled over the false testimony of four consecutive IRS Commissioners, Lois Lerner’s countless acts of malfeasance, and the IRS’s targeting of conservative groups and specific individuals, among them Senator Grassley. The ultimate outrage came over the lame, intellectually insulting assertions that all of the most relevant emails have gone missing from multiple IRS computers at the same time.

Today, Judicial Watch found a federal judge who has the integrity and fortitude to seek Justice—and this isn’t his first whack at the Department of Justice either. Enter Emmet G. Sullivan, United States District Judge for the District of Columbia. Mark July 10 in RED on your calendars.

Now, “Internal Revenue Service officials will have to explain to a federal judge July 10 why the tax agency didn’t inform the court that Lois Lerner’s emails had been lost,” the Washington Examiner reports.

Earlier today, attorneys for Judicial Watch sought a courtroom status conference “as soon as possible to discuss the IRS’s failure to fulfill its duties to this court under the law, as well as other ramifications of this lawsuit.” It took Judge Sullivan just a few hours to grant the hearing.

Now the IRS will have to talk to Judge Sullivan about all this—and he has the power to do something about it.

Judge Sullivan is the judge who held federal prosecutors in contempt, dismissed an unjust indictment against a United States Senator, and publicly excoriated the Department of Justice. He also had the moral conviction, courage and gumption to appoint a special prosecutor to investigate the Justice Department and the individual prosecutors.

The IRS, the White House, and the DOJ have a lot of explaining to do (and some emails to locate). The Washington Examiner reports that “No mention was made in that production of the lost Lerner emails, even though the original Judicial Watch FOIA lawsuit filed in May 2013 specifically sought them. Judicial Watch further noted that ‘although IRS had knowledge of the missing Lois Lerner emails and of the other IRS officials, it materially omitted any mention of the missing records’ in an April 30 status update on its document production.”

Emmet G. Sullivan, a graduate of Howard University and Howard Law who was appointed by President Clinton, is one of the heroes of my new book, Licensed to Lie: Exposing Corruption in the Department of Justice. Judge Sullivan ordered an independent investigation of the Department of Justice, which revealed its corrupted prosecution of United States Senator Ted Stevens.

Regarding Justice Sullivan, it would be interesting to hear his reaction to learning that Lois Lerner and the Whitehouse conspired to prosecute a sitting Senator, not for crimes he committed, but because he thwarted their plans to use illegal methods of intimidating the Presidents political opponents.

What could possibly go wrong you ask? Well considering that Barack Obama has completely disregarded the United States Constitution and the United States various and sundry laws, that the United States Congress has done absolutely NOTHING in response to his indisputably illegal actions, and that the Judicial system has had zero ability to enforce their ruling on his administration, one could be forgiven for thinking that even asking that question is like temping fate.

Indeed, what could go wrong?

Smoking hot nerd of the Month: Jeri Ellsworth

Jeri Ellsworth (born 1974) is an US entrepreneur and autodidact computer chip designer and inventor. Currently the president of Technical Illusions, she became known in 2004 for creating a complete Commodore 64 system on a chip within a joystick, called C64 Direct-to-TV. That “computer in a joystick” could run 30 video games from the early 1980s, and was a very popular Christmas gift, at peak selling over 70,000 units in a single day via the QVC shopping channel.[1] Ellsworth currently lives in Seattle

Ok, Jeri is smoking hot, and stone cold brilliant. She’s a high school drop out who taught herself electronics and programming. Best of all, she makes youtube video’s where she does stuff that ordinary people just are not suppose to be able to do. Yes, makes integrated circuits in her kitchen. No seriously, makes integrated circuits in her freaking kitchen.

I’m not smart like Jeri, though I wish I was.

A) She’s beautiful, B) she’s brilliant, C) she’s brilliant, and D), did I mention she’s brilliant?

Ok, Jeri has her own youtube channel, you can watch any of her 400 plus video’s. They’re are both amazing and inspiring.

https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=jeri+ellsworth+channel

EDIT: Just as an non sequitur, I would ask Jeri to marry me, but damn it, she’s obviously way to damned smart for me… <— Yes this is me weeping at the though of her rejecting of me…

Isn’t it time to just nuke Iraq, Iran and Afghanistan and call it all good?

Our so called leaders are bat shit insane. The hatred and killing, the “Conflict” in the Middle East has been going on for over 2000 years. We are not going to be the ones to solve it, unless we just admit that the Arabs are homicidal maniacs, pure 100 percent sociopaths and the only solution to their madness is to kill them all before they kill us.

Those who insist that somehow we can reason with the Arabs are deluding themselves and placing all of the rest of us at grave risk of being killed by psychopaths. You do not reason with Ted Bundy, you do not reason with John Wayne Gacy or Jeffery Dahmer, the sooner we accept that 99% of the Muslims in the Middle East are every bit the homicidal psychopaths that Bundy, Gacy or Dahmer were the sooner we can take reasonable actions. In the case of the middle east, reasonable actions would be turning Iraq, Iran and Afghanistan into giant puddles of molten green glass.

The options here, are to embrace insanity and deceive ourselves into thinking that we can fix something that has been going on for over 2000 years. A decision by the way that leads to an untold number of innocent lives being lost in repeated 9/11 events. Or accepting reality and putting an end to Arab Islamic homicidal psychopathic threats to the entire rest of the world.

I know, I know… I must be pure evil for thinking that it’s ok to murder tens of millions of innocent Arab Muslims. To which I respond.. Fucking spare me… Every since Thomas Jefferson sent the Marines to the shores of Tripoli the Muslims have been threatening to kill everyone who refuses to convert to Islam. Hell they have been not only threatening, but have been doing exactly that since 700 AD when Mohammad commanded them to do exactly that.

Albert Einstein once famously defined insanity as doing the same thing over and over again always expecting a different result. Islam is not going to suddenly come to it’s senses and become a peaceful religion. If we do not accept reality and admit that Arab Islam is a sociopath religion that cannot be redeemed then Arab Islam is going to continue murdering everyone who refuses to convert to Islam. We will be responsible for every one of those innocent deaths because we had the ability to put an end to Arab Islamic insanity and were too cowardly to do so.

There is a solution to the homicidal insanity that is Arab Islam.