Instead of Investigating Trump for colluding with the Russian’s, Mueller should be investigating Google.

President Donald Trump has been accused of colluding with Russian’s to influence the 2016 presidential election. The evidence just isn’t there to support this absurd assertion. The truth gets uglier and harder to ignore every day. If Robert Mueller were not on a witch hunt to overthrow the lawfully elected president of the United States of America because he is not who the Deep State chose to be POTUS, then Mueller would no doubt be investigating, well, nothing, because, the Deep State and the Democrat aren’t about to support or demand an investigation into actual illegal election influencing or tampering, or voter fraud.

IF, and of course that’s an IF the size of the entire Milkyway Galaxy, they were interested in investigating who has been attempting to illegally influence, tamper or otherwise promote voter fraud, (besides themselves of course) the very first place they, were they actually serious, would look, would be no further than Google.

Google is claiming that this was an accident caused by someone vandalizing a Wikipedia page, which the Google knowledge panels then attributed to the California Republican Party. I personally am calling bullshit on Google’s lame ass excuse. Bullshit, Google did this on purpose. Google should be under investigation for illegally attempting to influence the 2018 California primaries.

Its no secret that Google and the various Social Media companies are ardently anti conservative. They have systematically engaged in bias, misrepresentation, and outright censorship of conservative voices for years now. Google pleads innocence but the damage is already done. Let a Special Prosecutor be empaneled to investigate Google and the rest of the Social Media companies and determine if they have been intentionally violating federal election laws.

What Google has done isn’t merely unacceptable, it is as corrupt as well as morally and ethically repugnant as it gets. Roseanne Barr was fired and her hit TV show canceled for a far less offensive outburst on twitter. Roseanne disparaged a single individual, Google insulted denigrated and disparaged millions of Californian’s and attempted to sway the outcome of the California Primaries. Heads should roll and people should go to prison.

The March of the Marxist Censorship Apologists.

It isn’t just America, the whole world is suffering from this tyrannical abuse. Its called, “Politically Correct”, but what it really is, is tyranny in the form of censorship. With each passing year, it becomes more constrictive, more abusive. Speech for me (if I happen to be a Liberal Marxist) but not for thee.

Every year a new subject, word, term or phrase is added to the list of things that you are not allowed to speak about in public. Something new that offends is outlawed by the PC Police. Erick Erickson, one of America’s most successful fake Conservative Blogging Pundits once said in reference to the Militant Homosexual Agenda, “You will be made to Care”, and in a way, he was absolutely correct.

Where Erick was wrong (man that is a list that could take years to unpack) was, that he was only referring to the Militant Homosexual Agenda. But in truth, it isn’t just the Militant Homosexual Agenda that me, you and everyone else is going to be made to care about. Its the entire Marxist Political Agenda that we are all being forced to care about.

The Militant Homosexual Agenda, like it or not, is one of the most successful of the Marxist Useless Imbecilic programs ever devised. A literal creation of the British Marxist organization, the Fabian Society, it targeted Homosexuals in the usual Marxist fashion, identify a small minority, play of their resentment over being abused and discriminated against by society, and cultivate a militant sect willing to attack the society that discriminated against them for political overthrow. America’s African American community was targeted and manipulated in exactly the same manner.

The list of minority groups that have fallen prey to the Marxist revolutionaries around the world is huge. Each group having a legitimate grip against their society, and each group falling victim to the Marxist rhetoric that amounts to, society will never peacefully include you in society, and the only way to gain acceptance, is to destroy the society that is discriminating against you and recreate it as a new more tolerant and inclusive society.

By stoking the anger and resentment of these minority groups, the Marxist revolutionaries succeeded in convincing these minority groups, that the injustices they suffered were so egregious, so evil, so wrong, that the destruction of their society was not merely justified, but mandatory.

With their anger, fear and resentment enraged, each of those minority groups played right into the Marxist Revolutionaries hands and the grabbed on with both hands to the tactics offered them. The single most prevalent of those tactics is a logic fallacy of the highest order, one so egregious that its wide spread acceptance by these minority groups requires a suspension of disbelief in said individuals capacity for logical or rational cognizant thought.

That logic fallacy? “We will not tolerate intolerance”. The refusal to tolerate intolerance is in of itself, the single most abusive tyrannical and intolerant of positions an individual can take. It is the demand for discrimination and intolerance against all forms of thought not approved by those who themselves are demanding inclusion and tolerance.

Like Roseanne, all Americans are just one bad tweet away from being fired

This wasn’t Barr’s first racist tweet. So why now? The political climate is putting all employers on high alert when it comes to the words and behavior of their employees, Sinnreich says. “We’re understood to be private citizens, but when someone is the public face of a public corporation, that corporation should and must be held accountable for the actions of that individual,” he added.

Sinnreich says some people are frustrated with the lack of consequences when President Trump tweets racially-tinged comments. “Until the president is held accountable for the outrageous volume of hate speech that he generates, proxies are going to continue to come under the gun.” (President Trump has made incendiary remarks about Mexicans, Haitians and Nigerians.)

Many people are plugged into the news cycle all day long. One in five employers think staff is productive fewer than five hours a day, with most citing smartphone use as the culprit, a 2016 CareerBuilder report of hiring managers found.

That does not, however, mean you should share all your opinions on social media. The First Amendment protects free speech, but it may not protect your job if you do or say anything that is contrary to the company’s values, even if it’s a joke. In employment-at-will states, employees without a contract can be fired without cause.

“Twitter is today’s PR Newswire,” says Donna Francavilla, a communications specialist in Birmingham, Ala. “We think we’re talking to our followers and we think they’re all loyal to us and, if we issue an opinion, they’ll agree.” That’s not the case, she said. Often times, many people who follow Trump, for instance, may disagree with his views.

“It never used to be that way,” Francavilla said. “Social media used to be just you and your friends. But we’re now using this new megaphone to express our ideas to a much larger audience.” Anyone with a public Twitter account is a de facto public figure, she added. “We have to be mindful of every word we speak and everything we write.”

Yes, Roseanne said something offensive. That is not the problem. The problem lays with who decides what is offensive and who is allowed to be offensive. At the 2018 White House Correspondents’ Dinner far left liberal “Comedian” Michelle Wolf and a host of other far left liberals spent an entire evening making repugnant and offensive remarks about President Trump and the various members of his Administration.

Their defense for doing so? Trump is evil therefore, saying bad things about him is good. See how this works? Where is the refusal to tolerate intolerance? Where is the refusal to reject discrimination? Where is the insistence on condemning hateful rhetoric? Where? It does not exist, that’s where it is. No tolerance of Intolerance is not and never was about creating a more tolerant and inclusive society.

It has always and always will be a weapon to silence anyone who does not think the correct thoughts or say the correct things. And who is it that determines what those correct ideas and words are? Its always to most militant radical liberal left Marxist elements that make those determinations.

The hypocrisy has about it the rank stench of a rotting corpse. African American Rap Artists who make millions every year including the “N” word in nearly all of their music, no big deal right? Wrong, their music is not consumed by the African American Community alone, it is consumed by every strata of society. Google “why its wrong for white people to say nigga” you’ll find tens of thousands of justifications for a double standard that violates every principal of logic and reason. There are literally millions of young white kids around the world who sing along every day with songs that repeat the word over and over and over.

Enshrined the United States Constitution is the concept of “Freedom of Speech”. It’s not just in the first amendment, the concept runs the entire length and breadth of the Constitution. No where and at no point in the US Constitution will you ever find the concept that you have the right to not be offended by what someone else says or thinks.

Politically Correct Speech is as antithetical to the United States Constitution as it is possible to be. Yet it exists in America to such a degree that Roseanne Barr, a comedian well known for being vulgar and offensive, had her television show canceled and she was fired from her job for something that she said.

Kathy Griffin held up a prop of President Trumps severed head, the entire liberal Marxist community rushed to her defense, Michelle Wolf ranted on for over half an hour at the White House Correspondents’ Dinner saying the most vile and repugnant of things, she also was defended by the Liberal Marxist left. This is Politically Correct Speech, this is No tolerance of Intolerance, this is tyrannical abusive censorship.

It has one purpose and one alone. To enslave everyone to the political ideology of those who wield it, and that political ideology is an abomination and offense to the United States Constitution. Yet, and this is why it exists here in America, as repugnant and disgusting as it is, as offensive to those who cherish the United States Constitution as it is, it is protected by the Constitution of the United States just as every other form of speech is.

Once upon a time in America, we all knew and understood the meaning of the phrase, “I Disapprove of What You Say, But I Will Defend to the Death Your Right to Say It” the phrase, most often attributed to Evelyn Beatrice Hall, who was giving voice to sentiments expressed by the French philosopher François-Marie Arouet, (also known as ) Voltaire was for nearly 200 years the practical working definition of the American First Amendment defending Freedom of Speech.

The problem of course is, that when you have vile repugnant ideas or political ideologies, and you want to overthrow a society with them, the last thing that you want, is a citizenry capable of repudiating your ideological agenda. This is why Politically Correct Speech exists. To empower a group of revolutionaries against the larger society to dictate the rule of engagement in such a manner as to disarm that society so that it cannot resist being overthrown.

So, to once again quote Erick Erickson, “You will be made to Care”. You will be made to censor your every thought and word lest you be subjected to withering public criticism, the loss of your employment and possibly even the loss of your personal freedom. Just ask Not so Great Britain’s Tommy Robinson. Wait… But that’s the UK, that could never happen here, right? Really? What do you think the Obama Administration had youtube movie maker and creator of “The Innocence of Islam” Nakoula Basseley Nakoula arrested and incarcerated for?

This is exactly what Politically Correct Speech is, it is you being made to care.

Is Tommy Robinson Britain’s new Nelson Mandela?

Nelson Mandela, the violent Marxist Revolutionary has so many times been portrayed as a heroic figure for his fight against apartheid in South Africa. As is always the case with Marxist revolutionaries, Mandela picked the biggest symbol of oppression he could find and made it his supposed raison d’être.

The truth about Nelson Mandela is of course far different that the official Marxist narrative. Apartheid was of course not Mandela’s raison d’être, it was merely the vehicle by which he achieved his raison d’être, his raison d’être was in fact, Marxism. Yet regardless of the truth, still the vast majority of the world prefers to view Mandela as the heroic freedom fighter that he portrayed himself to be.

For his efforts, (which one must not be deceived or mistaken about, they were bloody violent attempts to install a Marxist Government in South Africa) South Africa made the fatal decision in 1962 of arresting, convicting and sentencing Nelson Mandela to life in prison.

The actions of the South African Government were the actions of a desperate and failing government to silence opposition to their rule. The policy of apartheid was a repugnant policy and had the South African Government recognized it as such back in 1962 and dismantled apartheid instead of imprisoning Nelson Mandela he would have never become the symbol for Marxist rebellion and the living martyr that he became.

The kind of decision to arrest, prosecute and imprison an individual for unpopular political speech that the Mandela case because universal symbol of, is a hallmark of a state either teeter on the edge of collapse, or on the edge of becoming a merciless totalitarian state.

Arresting an individual for expressing political idea’s that the government does not approve of is behavior one expects from totalitarian regimes like China and North Korea, not nations where the modern concepts of freedom and liberty were born like Great Britain.

Sequestered in the halls of power in Whitehall and Downing Street in the UK are a group of individuals unused to having their will questioned or defied. For reasons that escape even the most intelligent of individuals those aristocrats have made the conscience decision to replace the loyal native subjects of the Crown with a new group of individual who owe no allegiance to the Crown, and whose religious beliefs will always preclude them owing any allegiance to the Crown.

Tommy Robinson just happens to be one of those native indigenous loyal subjects of the Crown, who has made the unpardonable transgression of objecting to being replaced by Whitehall’s Islamic hordes.

http://www.foxnews.com/world/2018/05/26/right-wing-activist-tommy-robinson-reportedly-jailed-after-filming-outside-child-grooming-trial.html

U.K. right-wing activist and journalist Tommy Robinson was arrested and reportedly jailed Friday after he filmed members of an alleged child grooming gang entering a court for trial — but the details of his purported sentence remain murky after the judge ordered the press not to report on the case.

Robinson, the former head of the English Defense League and a longtime activist against Islam and Islamic migration, was arrested after he was filming men accused of being part of a gang that groomed children. Britain has been rocked by a series of child sex scandals perpetuated by gangs of predominantly Muslim men.

Video shows Robinson, whose real name is Stephen Lennon, being surrounded by as many as seven police officers as he livestreamed the incident on his phone. The police informed him he was being arrested for “breach of the peace.”

If you are somehow unaware of the “Child Grooming” situation in Great Britain, it goes something like this. Over the last 30 years members of the immigrate Muslim community in Britain has systemically engaged in the practice of luring, seducing, and then kidnapping young predominately white British girls and selling them into the sex trade industry.

And as bad as that sounds, the reality is 100 times worse, because the British Government/Scotland Yard has been aware of this practice for nearly the entire 30 plus years, and rather than putting an end to the practice has not only turned a blind eye to it, they have prosecuted pretty much anyone who has attempted to bring the crisis to the general public attention.

The more rational and cynical minded individuals in the world could easily be forgiven for wondering out loud if, given their actions, the British Government/Scotland Yard were not in fact engaging in this pattern of reprehensible and outrageous behavior because high ranking member of the British Government/Scotland Yard were in fact patrons of those “Child Grooming” gangs. You know the old saying, “Where there is smoke”.

Now the funny thing here regarding Tommy Robinson is, that Tommy is the genuine real deal that Nelson Mandela was portrayed as being. Tommy is not a Marxist riding the biggest crisis he could find to his ultimate goal of overthrowing the British Government and installing a new Marxist government in its place.

Tommy Robinson is an indigenous native Briton who is objecting to Downing Street replacing the indigenous native British population with Islamic immigrants. Whitehall has been attacking Robinson for at least a decade now, arresting and rearresting him. The British Media has smeared him with every conceivable derogatory lie and half truth they could think up for just as long.

And now, they have arrested him again and are deleting ever reference to his arrest that they are able to as quickly as they are able to. Nelson Mandela was never the symbol of a courageous principled freedom fighter that the media portrayed him as being, and equally so Tommy Robinson is not and never has been the prejudiced violent right wing ultra nationalist that Whitehall, Downing Street or the media have portrayed him as being.

The British Government/Whitehall/Downing Street are trying to do what the South African Government did to Nelson Mandela in 1962. Lock Tommy Robinson up for the purpose of silencing him. It didn’t work for the South African Government who held Mandela in prison for 27 years. Nelson Mandela shuffled off this mortal coil in 2013, the South African Government that imprisoned him for 27 years shuffled off this mortal coil long before Mandela did, and Mandela served as President of South Africa between 10 May 1994 – 16 June 1999.

The effect of attempting to silence a man with a righteous cause has consequences. Mandela was not a righteous man and his ambitions of creating a Marxist South Africa were not righteous, but his determination to end apartheid was a righteous cause. Tommy Robinson’s crusade to end and reverse the elimination of and replacement of the indigenous native population of the British Isles is likewise a righteous cause.

Were the indigenous native population of the British Isles anything other than white, the entire worlds media would be screaming for the heads of everyone in Whitehall and Downing Street to be cut off and stuck upon pikes and panted alongside the roads leading in and out of London. And right there is the devil in the detail that is dooming the British Government and the British people.

These same individuals in Whitehall and Downing Street, (the same ones no doubt of whom questions as to whether they are the “Child Grooming gangs” best paying and most loyal “Punters” customers or not) have committed the single most egregious transgression against their citizens that any government can ever commit. No, not just protecting pedophile gangs, but of refusing to protect the actual citizens of their nation.

For now they have silenced Tommy Robinson, for now anyways. South African thought they had solved the Nelson Mandela problem as well by imprisoning and silencing him, 27 years later, it bit their heads clean off then shit them back out on top of their still warm corpses.

Tommy Robinson is in fact everything that Nelson Mandela was suppose to be, but wasn’t. Sins and crimes against humanity that Tommy Robinson will no doubt be made to suffer for. How dare a white man object to being made a minority in the land of his birth that has always been a majority white nation. The struggle is exactly the same.

Nelson Mandela believed that the Black majority of South Africa should not be punished and made third class citizens in the land they were born in which had always been a Black majority country. For his efforts Mandela was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize and hailed around the world as a hero.

Robinson, whose message is for all practical purposes the same message with the only difference being the color of his skin and that of the indigenous people he represents is being cast as the reincarnation of Adolph Hitler. One has to wonder at the moral and ethical values of the government of Briton and the British media.

Yes.. most generous and loyal “Punters” customer’s of the “Child Grooming Gangs” indeed.

When Failure is the only Option.

AS we all know, the New York Slimes seldom gets anything right. So, consider my surprise when I ran across this article this morning. It comes about as close to getting it right as anything I have read in a long time.

Here is where I believe KEITH GESSEN and the Russia hands he refers to managed to get it all fucked up.

None of the Russian former satellites ever wanted to become democracies. What they wanted, was autonomy. The basic failure of Gessen and the Russia hand’s was this. The Soviet Union my have collapsed, but the plutocracy in Russia did not and neither did Russia itself.

The fact that Russia was a Communist nation did not mean that it was not ruled and run by a Plutocracy. Every nation on earth, in the entire history of humanity has been run and ruled by a Plutocracy of one form or another.

Those individuals who comprise the Plutocracy are seldom members of the government itself, but by virtue of their wealth dictate government policy in a thousand small ways. Most importantly of all, they never ever willing self immolate.

When the Soviet Union collapsed, Russia’s plutocracy scrambled to remain exactly what they had been under communism, plutocrats. The various former satellites of the Soviet Union found themselves in a position where their own homegrown plutocrats had access to even greater wealth and power than they had had under the old Soviet Union.

They did not was democracy, what they wanted was the autonomy to capitalize upon their new found freedom. And just like every plutocrat that has ever lived, they wanted to ensure that they did not lose their newly heightened status.

Every effort made by Fried and Nuland to push democracy into those former Soviet satellites was predicated upon the willful misunderstanding of what was motivating the political leadership of those former Soviet Satellites. That willful misunderstand was predicated upon their own need to be right with regard to their ideological agenda’s in approaching the Russia conundrum.

In short, they saw what they wanted to see, not what was right under their noses. They pushed an agenda in the former Russian satellites that were another nation to attempt in Mexico or Canada, they themselves would start a nuclear war to prevent.

Were Mexico to suddenly claim that the Citizens of California had voted to become a part of Mexico and then send troops into California, you can bet the US’s response would be one of all hell breaking loose.

This is essentially what took place in Georgia, Crimea and Ukraine. Except that it was the EU/US who were making the assertion that these former Soviet Satellites had voted to become part of the EU/NATO.

Anyone who cannot see how Russia would find that threatening should not be allowed within a light year of a US policy making position.

Yes, the Russian system of self governance in the past and even today is not anything that any person born in any of the western democracies would ever consider an acceptable system of governance. By western standards it is abusive and repressive.

Yes, western styled democracies are much nicer places to live. They offer their citizens a far more open and free society in which to live and thrive. But as George Santayana famously noted, “Those who do not learn history are doomed to repeat it.”

And what so many of these Russia hands have obviously failed to learn from history is, that the freedoms and liberties of western styled democracies are an alien concept to the vast majority of human beings. It is this very reason that even our own democracy is now teetering on the edge of collapsing.

The powerful and wealthy want above all things to remain exactly that, the powerful and wealthy and it does not matter to them in the slightest what form of government plays the open face of the society that ensured that they remain the wealthy and powerful, just so long as they remain the wealthy and powerful.

This, more than anything, is why the Russia hands have failed to secure any meaningful advances in the relationship between Russia and the US. The plutocrats in the former Soviet satellites want not democracy, but the autonomy to secure and reinforce their newly enhanced status as plutocrats.

The Russia hands, desperate to spread western styled democracy have failed time and time again to grasp that pushing western democracy into these former Soviet satellites represents a clear and present danger to the government of Russia and Russia’s own plutocrats.

The Department of Injustice’s Corruptocracy strikes again.

In a move we all knew was coming, but prayed would not, the endemic and systemic corruption that has infested the Department of Injustice has reared it ugly head yet again.

DOJ Declines to Prosecute FBI Agent Who Mishandled Classified Information, Gave Misleading Testimony, Provided False Information to IG

(CNSNews.com) – The Department of Justice, according to the department’s Office of Inspector General, has declined to prosecute a now-retired FBI special agent (SA) who mishandled classified information, gave misleading testimony, had “contacts with several individuals appeared to be designed to improperly influence their prospective testimony” and provided the IG with false information.

“Criminal prosecution of the SA was declined,” the IG reported in an investigative summary of the case.

According to the Justice Department, the law governing inspector generals requires an IG to refer a case to a federal prosecutor when the IG discovers reasonable grounds to believe that federal law has been violated.

But it is then up to the prosecutor to decide whether to actually bring charges.

The DOJ IG published its “investigative summary” of the case involving the now-retired, not-prosecuted FBI special agent on April 30.

[This screen capture below shows a paragraph from the IG’s investigative summary that lays out some of the misconduct the IG attributed to a now-retired FBI special agent.]

“The Department of Justice (DOJ) Office of the Inspector General (OIG) initiated this investigation after receiving information from the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), Inspection Division, alleging that an FBI Special Agent (SA), who has since retired, may have contacted witnesses during a federal criminal investigation for an improper purpose,” said the summary.

“The OIG found that the SA contacted individuals who he either knew were, or had reasonable belief would be witnesses in the criminal investigation and that the SA’s contacts with several individuals appeared to be designed to improperly influence their prospective testimony,” said the summary. “Accordingly, the OIG concluded that the SA’s contacts with the witnesses were improper and constituted misconduct.

“During the investigation, the OIG also found that the SA divulged law enforcement sensitive information to unauthorized individuals; misused his government issued electronic devices; provided misleading testimony during a related civil deposition; mishandled classified information; misused his position during contacts with local law enforcement officers; and provided false information to the OIG,” said the summary.

“Criminal prosecution of the SA was declined,” it continued.

The Department of Injustice has rendered it verdict. That verdict essentially amounts to: “Fuck off America, We are your Overlords, We are not subject to the laws We enforce over you”. This is exactly the two tiered legal system that the vast majority of American’s object too to such a degree that it swept Donald Trump into the Oval office.

This amounts to nothing less than a declaration from the Department of Injustice that: “There is no Justice in America, only such benevolence as the Deep State Ruling Class deigns to dispense upon the Slave Class as it sees fit”.
The DOJ and FBI have not had their reputations damaged by the actions of their agents or senior administration officials, nor has anything President Trump said tarnished or diminished their reputations. All that has taken place consequential to those actions, is that American’s have been shown the true nature of those two institutes.

The mask is off the Beast, the facade has been removed from the prison and the prison guards have put on their prison guard uniforms. When FBI Director James Comey refused to even ref Hillary Clinton to the Department of Injustice for prosecution the majority of American’s realized that the FBI and the DOJ were the Deep State and that they were the one’s charged with protecting the Deep State Ruling Class from the smelly uneducated hoi polloi.

The United States Department of Injustice and the Federal Bureau of Instigation have proven themselves to be the true genetic heirs and offspring of those Nazi senior administration officials that so efficiently administrated the Auschwitz-Birkenau Housing Community for the Enlightenment and Prosperity of Germany’s Jewish Citizenry.

In 1789 the common citizens of France confronted the ancestors of America’s Deep State. On 10 October 1789, physician Joseph-Ignace Guillotin suggested that the Guillotine was the best and most obvious method of correcting the French Citizenry’s dispute with the ancestors of America’s Deep State.

It seems that no matter how many times they are stamped out in the most violently bloodily of manners, these elitists refuse to get the message or consider themselves to not have a divine mandate to rule humanity. Its almost as if we are watching a scene from “Interview with a Vampire” where the highest level of the Vampire Aristocracy revels that they are the children of a God and humanity is their divinely designated prey.

At this point in time, I can make this prediction. The legacy of the Trump Presidential Administration rest entirely on whether or not he guts the United States Department of Injustice and the Federal Bureau of Instigation from the center to the outside walls and completely rebuilds them with such transparency that even those most cynical citizen can be convinced that the concept of “Equal Justice Under the Law” has been restored to America, or Donald J Trump will be designated by future historians just one more in a long line of elitist aristocrat presidents who betrayed and deceived America to keep their corrupt Plutocracy in power.

When you strike at a king, you must kill him

American philosopher and poet Ralph Waldo Emerson is famously quoted as saying “When you strike at a king, you must kill him”. This saying is a truth of such magnitude that it risks being a “reductio ad absurdum” logic fallacy. Not because the argument is absurd, but because the truth of it is so profound that any failure to comprehend the consequences is an absurdity.

Sometime in 2015 a coalition of senior Obama administration officials made the conscience decision to engage in just such an act. They decided that it was in the nations best interests (well, their opinion of what the nation should be anyways) that Hillary Clinton become the next POTUS, and that to that result, they would engage in whatever actions were required to achieve that end goal.

When that goal failed to materialize, all evidence appears to indicate they discovered that the actions they had taken put them in legal jeopardy of serious federal felony prosecution. They had “Struck at the King” but failed to kill him, and consequently were left with no choice but to continue striking at him in the hopes of killing him before the King could retaliate.

Candidate Trump had threatened to take both the US Constitution, and US Law seriously. Given that these senior Obama administration officials had violated numerous federal statutes in their attempt to prevent candidate Trump from becoming President Trump, they had little choice. They then proceeded to do the only thing left to them, they doubled down.

FBI director James Comey violated federal law and apparently conspired with Assistant US Attorney Rod Rosenstein to have a special counsel appointed to investigate the POTUS. Rosenstein then appointed Robert Mueller to investigate whether the Trump campaign had colluded with Russian operative to influence the outcome of the 2016 Presidential election.

From a legal standpoint neither Rosenstein nor Mueller should have ever been allowed to instigate or be involved in such an investigation as both of them have clear and indisputable conflicts of interest in the case.

Why Hasn’t Rod Rosenstein Recused Himself From the Mueller Investigation?

Rosenstein must recuse himself from involvement in Mueller probe

The Rosenstein Memo

For Mueller, a question of three conflicts

The fact that Mueller is a potential plaintiff in a felony criminal prosecution against Hillary Clinton for her Uranium 1 scandal alone should have made it impossible for Mueller to serve as a special counsel. Striking the King indeed, under what circumstances could the concept “Conflict of Interest” have a more clear cut application, then in destroying the individual who has threatened to have you prosecuted for federal felonies possibly exist?

What is clear is that the CIA/NSA/FBI/DOJ are indeed striking at the King, not, as they insist, because President Trump colluded with any foreign nationals to influence the outcome of the 2016 Presidential election, but because failure to bring down Trump leaves them exposed as having violated numerous federal laws in their own attempt to influence the outcome of the 2016 Presidential election.

Moreover, their strikes at President Trump become ever more transparent and desperate as the extent of their mendacious malfeasance become increasingly apparent.

Byron York: FBI appears ready to miss another deadline in Trump-Russia probe

Grassley rips Strzok-Page redactions amid mystery text: Obama ‘White House is running this’

The willful obstruction of justice.

Mueller Rejects Speedy Trial Law To Delay Russian Collusion Trial

The abuse of authority.

8 signs pointing to a counterintelligence operation deployed against Trump’s campaign

Sorry, But Obama White House, Not Dossier, Was Behind Trump Investigation

The Real Origination Story of the Trump-Russia Investigation

And the plot to overthrow the lawfully elected presidential administration of Donald J Trump.

Yes, senior Obama administration officials conspired to launch a 18 US Code Sections 2384 & 2385 Coup d’état against the presidential administration of Donald J Trump because the possibility and threat that President Donald J Trump might actually follow through on the threats made by candidate Donald J Trump to have the Obama administration investigated for the illegal surveillance “Wire tapping” of his campaign was far to great to be ignored.

Those CIA/NSA/FBI/DOJ senior administration officials had violated federal law in attempting to procure damaging evidence against candidate Trump in an effort to influence the 2016 presidential election in favor of Hillary Clinton. As POTUS, candidate Trump would no longer be restricted to tweeting and complaining about being spied on illegally, he would have the constitutional authority to have those complaints investigated and those responsible prosecuted.

Back to Ralph Waldo Emerson and “When you strike at a king, you must kill him”, the reason you must strike to kill, is that a king has unlimited authority to take retribution not just on the one who struck, but on every individual who in any way shape of form aided and or abetted that individual, and the kings retribution will be fatal to those individuals.

Every one of those Obama administration senior level officials knew for a fact that every single time candidate Donald J Trump made a reference to the “Deep State”, that it was them Trump was referring to, they also knew that if they did not take Trump out before he could do so, that every one of them faced felony criminal prosecution for their role in the illegal surveillance of his campaign and their attempt to illegally influence the outcome of the 2016 presidential election.

Power Corrupts and Absolute Power Corrupts Absolutely: The Obama Administration Edition.

John Brennan and James Clapper, two of the most powerful men in America had deep seated reservations regarding the election of Donald J Trump as President of the United States of America. Or, to be more precise, their vision for the United States of America. Reservations that were shared by FBI Director James Comey Assistant Attorney General Rod Rosenstien and several dozen other senior administrative level employees of the CIA, NSA, FBI and DOJ.

These reservations were not predicated upon Donald Trump being an agent of some foreign country, but upon his not being in step with the policy agenda of America’s liberal far left. Trump had not sworn fidelity to the Deep States political agenda. That was Donald J Trump’s fatal transgression.

I can think of no more appropriate description of what these senior Obama Administration level individuals did, than this quote by Christian Conservative apologist C.S Lewis:

““Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron’s cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience. They may be more likely to go to Heaven yet at the same time likelier to make a Hell of earth. This very kindness stings with intolerable insult. To be “cured” against one’s will and cured of states which we may not regard as disease is to be put on a level of those who have not yet reached the age of reason or those who never will; to be classed with infants, imbeciles, and domestic animals.” ”

It’s Time To Admit The Russia Investigation Was Illegitimate From The Start

I Was Once In Group Three, Too

For two years, I teetered between that third contingent and utter disinterest. But then we learned that the DOJ intentionally failed to inform the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act court that the Democratic National Committee had paid for the Christopher Steele dossier. That unverified and mainly false dossier formed a significant part of the government’s application for a wiretap for former Trump aide Page.

This admission changed everything for me: I had spent nearly 25 years reviewing challenges to warrants based on claims of withheld (or false) evidence. However, unlike the typical criminal case in which a defendant later has access to the warrant application, in the case of a FISA court order, the target cannot view the information the government used to obtain a wiretap, making FISA court proceedings ripe for abuse.

My rule of law alarms went off. Trump’s criticism of the Russia collusion investigation no longer sounded staged, and he no longer seemed paranoid. Then the revelations kept coming, as did leaks intended to harm Trump, change the narrative, or soften soon-to-be released news of other misconduct.

Meanwhile, what was not forthcoming was the information Congress requested, and when it belatedly arrived it was heavily redacted to protect “national security.” Then later releases revealed the national security excuse didn’t hold. So while claims that the FBI properly inquired of connections between the Trump campaign and Russia were valid to a point, that point has long since passed.

Was there good faith in the beginning? Did political appointees and career agents rightfully pursue leads to see if something was there? Or was the investigation always an insurance policy?

I don’t know. What I do know, though, is that there is a convincing mosaic of evidence that the FBI, CIA, National Security Agency, and DOJ acted with improper motives—some related to the Obama administration’s general modus operandi, and some specific to Crossfire Hurricane.

Day by day, hour by hour the evidence continues to pile up. Senior Obama administration officials within the CIA, NSA, FBI and DOJ conspired to engage in a 18 US Code Sections 2384 & 2385 Coup d’état against a lawfully elected President of the United States of America. These individuals believe themselves to be patriots, they ardently believe that Donald Trump presents a clear and present danger to the United States of America because unlike their chosen Presidential candidate Hillary Clinton, Trump is not a known quantity or a “Policy Wonk”.

They believe that President Trump is a brash, undisciplined bully who will endanger America through his lack of government and foreign policy experience. It is for this reason, and not anything else that they elected to intervene and attempt to alter the outcome of the 2016 Presidential election in favor of Hillary Clinton, and when that failed, to find just cause to prosecute and have removed from office President Donald J Trump.

BREAKING: E-mails Show FBI Brass Discussed Dossier Briefing Details With CNN

Newly revealed e-mails show that former Federal Bureau Investigation (FBI) deputy director Andrew McCabe was keenly aware of CNN’s internal understanding of a secret briefing about the infamous Steele dossier, days before CNN published any stories on the matter. The e-mails, which were obtained by Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wisc.), also reveal that top officials used coded language to refer to the salacious and unverified allegations made by Steele.

Former FBI director James Comey briefed then-President-Elect Donald Trump on January 6, 2017, on at least one unproven allegation contained in Steele’s dossier, which was jointly funded by the Hillary Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee. CNN broke the story about the dossier briefing on January 10, 2017, touching off a firestorm of hysteria that culminated in not just the firing of Comey by Trump, but the eventual appointment of Department of Justice (DOJ) special counsel Robert Mueller.

Comey claimed that he was compelled to brief Trump on the dossier because “CNN had [it]” and was “looking for a news hook.”

Hours before Comey briefed Trump, FBI chief of staff James Rybicki e-mailed staff that Comey “is coming into HQ briefly now for an update from the sensitive matter team.” Just as the same officials dubbed the Clinton e-mail investigation the “mid-year exam” and the anti-Trump counterintelligence investigation “Crossfire Hurricane,” they also used various phrases using “sensitive” to refer obliquely to the dossier.

Two days after the briefing, on January 8, 2017, former FBI deputy director Andrew McCabe, who earlier this year was fired and then referred for criminal prosecution by the DOJ inspector general for repeatedly lying about media leaks, wrote an e-mail to top FBI officials with the subject, “Flood is coming.”

The FBI’s former director J Edgar Hoover has been lambasted for his unprecedented abuse of federal authority for decades, yet, what is coming to light with regard to the 2016 presidential election is a series of mendacious malfeasance that makes J Edgar Hoover past transgressions seem almost patriotic and noble. Nixon’s Watergate scandal, by comparison was the work of kindergarten children getting caught stealing graham crackers while the teacher was out of the room.

FBI Scandal: Deep State Corruption Of FBI, Justice Was There From Very Start Of Hillary Email Probe

Deep State: Were the Justice Department and FBI corrupted by their efforts to protect Hillary Clinton and her future chances at the presidency? Recent revelations suggest the answer is an unqualified yes, and now those who cooperated may soon feel the law’s sting for doing so.

Former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe may be the worst off. In addition to possible charges for lying under oath for denying that he leaked information to the Wall Street Journal (in large part dfto answer swirling rumors in the journalistic community), it’s alleged that he ordered FBI agents working on the Clinton Foundation investigation to stand down.

Now, evidence suggests he told the FBI’s Washington field office to also “stand down” from its investigation of Clinton’s private-email server. That investigation followed a New York Times piece that appeared in 2015, detailing Hillary Clinton’s possible illegal use of an unsecured, home-brew email server for her official business as secretary of state. It appears to be a clear violation of the law.

“Multiple former FBI officials, along with a Congressional official, say that while there may have been internal squabbling over the FBI’s investigation into the Clinton Foundation at the time, there was allegedly another ‘stand-down’ order by McCabe regarding the opening of the investigation into Hillary Clinton’s use of her private email for official government business,” wrote independent journalist Sarah Carter.

That’s two stand-down orders, if you’re counting, that McCabe made. That he would intervene twice on behalf of Clinton suggests not an abundance of caution but that he had political qualms rather than merely procedural ones.

It’s a troubling question of political interference that that could deeply taint the FBI for years to come, and make doing its job all the much harder, particularly if it’s viewed as a politically-biased agency by a major part of the country.

But former FBI chief James Comey isn’t far behind McCabe.

Comey opposed the idea of a special counsel to investigate Hillary Clinton’s egregious misuse of her email system — which, intelligence experts say, likely exposed U.S. classified material to both the Russian and Chinese intelligence agencies — despite substantial evidence of a crime.

Why? Because, he wrote, the main reason for appointing a special counsel would have been because there were serious questions about then-Attorney General Loretta Lynch’s ability to be unbiased — especially after the unplanned, unrecorded and highly curious half-hour meeting she had with Bill Clinton while sitting in a jet plane at the Phoenix airport.

Comey, ever chivalrous, said naming a special counsel “would have been unfair to Hillary Clinton.”

But, as Aaron Klein of Breitbart news writes, “Comey, however hand no problem taking actions to ensure a special prosecutor in the case of Donald Trump and unsubstantiated claims of Russian collusion based in part on charges made inside a largely-discredited dossier financed by Clinton”s 2016 presidential campaign and the Democratic National Committee.”

Having failed to get Hillary Clinton elected, these Deep State thugs began a program described in an email between Pete Strzok and Lisa Page, as their “Insurance Policy”. A program designed to first cripple and then to eventually remove President Donald Trump from office. Just how deep the rabbit hole goes is yet to be discovered, and given the corrupt investment by America’s Mainstream Media in protecting both Barack Obama and his administrations senior level officials and Hillary Clinton, it is difficult to say if we will ever learn exactly how deep that rabbit hole is.

Spying On Trump: Was Obama Behind CIA, FBI Plan To Elect Hillary?

Political Spying: As Robert Mueller’s chimerical Russia-Trump collusion probe grinds on, a real possible crime has been revealed: the collusion between the Justice Department, the FBI, the Clinton campaign and, possibly, the Obama administration, to plant a spy in the Trump campaign.

If so, as some say, it’s bigger than Watergate.

The spy’s name is Stefan Halper, a professor at Cambridge University who has high-level ties to both U.S. and British intelligence, as Daily Caller New Foundation investigative reporter Chuck Ross discovered.

The revelation made Trump livid, and rightly so, as his tweet on Sunday afternoon plainly showed: “I hereby demand, and will do so officially tomorrow, that the Department of Justice look into whether or not the (FBI and Department of Justice) infiltrated or surveilled the Trump Campaign for Political purposes — and if any such demands or requests were made by people within the Obama Administration!”

Both the New York Times and Washington Post knew the professor’s name, but coyly decided not to reveal it, citing intelligence officials’ warnings that to do so would might endanger him or other intelligence contacts.

The Daily Caller’s Ross, using Google and the copious information about the “informant” in the Times and Post pieces, was easily able to identify Halper.

The debate over semantics of how to refer to Halper is amusing, but serious. Trump-hating mainstream media, echoing the FBI’s and Justice Department’s preferred term, call Halper an “informant,” not a “spy.”

Why? Because, if it turns out that putting a spy into Trump’s presidential campaign was actually political rather than for national security, it would be plainly illegal. A lot of people could have careers ruined or go to prison.

The FBI, it was reported last week, even had a name for the larger program of spying on the Trump campaign: “Operation Crossfire Hurricane,” cribbed from the Rolling Stones hit “Jumpin’ Jack Flash.” As part of this, now we know they had at least one spy in the Trump campaign.

As the New York Times reported, the project began in earnest in August 2016 “after the CIA director at the time, John O. Brennan, shared intelligence with Mr. (James) Comey showing that the Russian government was behind an attack on the 2016 presidential election. Intelligence agencies began collaborating to investigate that operation. The Crossfire Hurricane team was part of that group but largely operated independently, three officials said.”

Despite repeated denials, the CIA and FBI were using Russian meddling in the election as an excuse to have Halper spy on the Trump campaign. A long-time CIA asset who worked for the Nixon administration, Halper was the son-in-law of former CIA Deputy Director Ray Cline, and still directs the Cambridge Security Initiative, a “non-profit” intelligence consultancy that Ross noted “lists ‘UK and US government agencies’ among its clients.”

Over the last few years, the phrase “Fake News” has found its way into the public lexicon, much to the annoyance of the Mainstream Media. While the Media likes to pretend that it is a Trumpism that has no basis in reality, the fact is that it has been in the mind of 3/4th of the American population since Dan Rather’s infamous “Fake but Accurate” scandal which cost him his career. It was reinforced just a few years later when Brain Williams was awarded the title “Lyin Brian” for the exact same offense.

For decades the Mainstream Media has attempted to convince mainstream America that there is no liberal bias in the media. This despite numerous well documented scholarly articles, studies and reports which uncategorically prove the exact opposite. Moreover, polling by Gallup has clearly proven that this undisguised bias has had as a consequence a unprecedented decrease in trust of the Mainstream Media by mainstream America. The Mainstream Media’s response rather than being that of working to eliminate the bias that has destroyed their reputations and the profitability of their businesses, has been to double down not only on the denials of liberal bias, but on the viciousness of their attacks on those on the right side of the political aisle.

Defending spies in the Trump campaign is the height of liberal hypocrisy

It has been said that if you live long enough, you will see everything. I’m experiencing that feeling as I watch the New York Times and Washington Post abandon their ultra-liberal leanings to defend government spying on innocent American citizens.

The case shows Trump Derangement Syndrome in action as it turns two of the nation’s prominent newspapers into the type of organizations they spent 50 years attacking.

By switching sides, they become the bell cows of a Deep State Media that, in another era, would have shielded Sen. Joseph McCarthy. And so the famous question Army lawyer Joseph Welch asked the scurrilous McCarthy should now be directed at them: “At long last, have you left no sense of decency?”

This latest version of media madness involves the confirmation that the FBI and perhaps the CIA sent a spy — or maybe two spies — to see whether Donald Trump’s associates were in cahoots with Russia during the 2016 campaign.

The spying is an event of enormous consequences, with no known precedent in American history, because it catches the incumbent party targeting the candidate of the opposition party. Even Richard Nixon didn’t weaponize law enforcement and intelligence agencies to this extent.

Additionally, the timing of the spying effort matters because it began before the FBI says it started its counterintelligence probe into the Trump campaign. So was that official July start date another James Comey lie?

Then there’s John Brennan, Barack Obama’s last CIA chief, who is calling attention to himself with Twitter threats against Trump and any others who pursue the matter. His panic is not pretty, but it is instructive.

On its face alone, the spying destroys any possibility that the Obama administration played it straight during the 2016 election. The only questions now are how wide and how high did the cancer spread.

Yet instead of denouncing the malignant invasions of privacy, as they did when President George W. Bush spied on foreign terrorists, the Deep State papers are rushing to defend domestic snooping. They split semantic hairs, calling the spy an “informant” or a “source” in a silly bid to give him a sheen of respectability.

Media insist: FBI’s source on Trump was an ‘informant,’ not a ‘spy’

News reports have revealed the identity of a Cambridge University professor who fed information about the Trump campaign to the FBI but the national media have consistently declined to characterize the activity as spying, and are actively rejecting President Trump’s push to call it spying.

“A lot of people are saying they had spies in my campaign,” President Trump told reporters Tuesday at the White House. “If they had spies in my campaign that would be a disgrace to this country.” He added that it “would be one of the biggest insults anyone has ever seen” if it were confirmed that spies working under the Obama administration had infiltrated his campaign, which he described as “very illegal.”

The Washington Post’s report on those comments said Trump was making a reference to a “confidential source” who the FBI used to “aid its investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election.” But the story disputed Trump’s suggestion that the FBI may have secretly spied on his campaign, and said there’s “no evidence to suggest that the source was inserted into the Trump campaign…”

The story instead chose to describe the informant as someone who “did engage in a pattern of seeking out and meeting Trump campaign advisers.”

The Liberal Mainstream Media, just as their liberal brother’s in Arms the Liberal Deep State both hold the same contemptuous view of the average American. It is that contemptuous view that lead so many senior Obama administration officials to decide to intervene in the 2016 presidential election. It is the belief that the American people are to willfully ignorant, uneducated, and generally lacking in intelligence to make the correct decisions regarding local, state and federal policy matters and especially regarding foreign policy decisions.

In short, Americans cannot be trusted to do what is in the nations best interests. It is here, that we are forced to confront once again those prophetic words of C.S Lewis.

““Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron’s cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience. They may be more likely to go to Heaven yet at the same time likelier to make a Hell of earth. This very kindness stings with intolerable insult. To be “cured” against one’s will and cured of states which we may not regard as disease is to be put on a level of those who have not yet reached the age of reason or those who never will; to be classed with infants, imbeciles, and domestic animals.” ”

This is where we are today in America. Living under the yoke of omnipotent moral busybodies, tormented for our own good, without end, and with the approval of their conscience’s because they have reduced us to this state, To be “cured” against our will and cured of states which we may not regard as disease, to be put on a level of those who have not yet reached the age of reason or those who never will; to be classed with infants, imbeciles, and domestic animals.

This is why the Obama administration officials within the Deep State acted as they did. To protect America from itself, because it is their collective opinion that we, the citizens of the United States of America, WE The People have not yet reached the age of reason or never will; to be classed with infants, imbeciles, and domestic animals.

BREAKING NEWS ALERT:

Clucksville Kentucky; Clucksville Sheriff Eric Ericks has just briefed reporters that his deputies are responding to what Ericks describes as the largest mass homicide in Clucksville’s history. The mutilated remains of 48 factory worker’s were discovered early this morning as the morning shift at Eggoland arrived at around 7am.

The only suspect in this grisly homicide, dismissed former security guard Brennan Fox O’Clapper is being sought by authorities. O’Clapper is believed to be holed up somewhere on his mother’s rural estate. When Sheriff Ericks deputies attempted to question O’Clapper’s mother on the whereabouts of her son, she denied any knowledge of his location.

Though approximately 2 hours later Michelle O’Clapper, (the fugative’s mother) read a prepared statement to journalists. The statement is as follows.

“Fox is not responsible for the deaths of the Chickens in the Hen-house, Fox is a good son and has never had any trouble with the law; Signed Fox’s Mother”

There you have it folks, if Fox’s mother says Fox didn’t eat all the chickens in the Hen-house, then you can rest easy at night knowing that nothing nefarious is going on here in Clucksville.

For references to this story, please see the following documents submitted to the court on behalf of Brennan Fox O’Clapper.

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/05/john-brennan-fires-warning-shot-to-paul-ryan-and-mitch-mcconnell-after-trump-orders-doj-to-investigate-fbis-campaign-infiltration/

http://thefederalist.com/2018/05/17/10-key-takeaways-from-new-york-times-error-ridden-defense-of-fbi-spying-on-trump-campaign/

Stopping Robert Mueller to protect us all

New York Times Admits that the FBI violated Presidential Candidate Donald J Trump’s 4th and 5th Amendment Constitutional Rights.

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/18/us/politics/trump-fbi-informant-russia-investigation.html

F.B.I. Used Informant to Investigate Russia Ties to Campaign, Not to Spy, as Trump Claims

WASHINGTON — President Trump accused the F.B.I. on Friday, without evidence, of sending a spy to secretly infiltrate his 2016 campaign “for political purposes” even before the bureau had any inkling of the “phony Russia hoax.”

In fact, F.B.I. agents sent an informant to talk to two campaign advisers only after they received evidence that the pair had suspicious contacts linked to Russia during the campaign. The informant, an American academic who teaches in Britain, made contact late that summer with one campaign adviser, George Papadopoulos, according to people familiar with the matter. He also met repeatedly in the ensuing months with the other aide, Carter Page, who was also under F.B.I. scrutiny for his ties to Russia.

The FBI is well and truly FUCKED and a shit load of assholes from the 7th floor are now is genuine peril of going to prison. Try as they might to spin this, the New York Times has admitted that the FBI knowingly and willingly spied on presidential candidate Donald J Trump for political purposes.

This, as President Trump himself tweeted just days ago is a scandal that makes Nixon’s Watergate scandal small and inconsequential by comparison.

No evidence has emerged that the informant acted improperly when the F.B.I. asked for help in gathering information on the former campaign advisers, or that agents veered from the F.B.I.’s investigative guidelines and began a politically motivated inquiry, which would be illegal.

This denial is as knowingly false as it is possible for a denial to be, as this previous statement in this NY Times article make indisputably clear.

In fact, F.B.I. agents sent an informant to talk to two campaign advisers only after they received evidence that the pair had suspicious contacts linked to Russia during the campaign. The informant, an American academic who teaches in Britain, made contact late that summer with one campaign adviser, George Papadopoulos, according to people familiar with the matter. He also met repeatedly in the ensuing months with the other aide, Carter Page, who was also under F.B.I. scrutiny for his ties to Russia.

Here is how and why this proves that this statement is knowingly false. The professor whom the NY Times refuses to name, is the same professor that told Papadopoulos that the Russian’s had documents/information on the Clinton campaign and offered to arrange for the Trump campaign to acquire said information/documents.

http://dailycaller.com/2018/03/25/george-papadopoulos-london-emails/

This is the same information that Papadopoulos is reputed to have told an Australian Ambassador. Which according to the FBI, is the reason for their investigating member’s of the Trump campaign. In short, in their bungling attempt to minimize the damage of what has recently come to light, and more importantly what is no doubt about to come to light with the Inspector General’s report, the New York Times has unwittingly exposed the fact that the FBI was illegally spying on the Trump campaign and then, planted evidence within the Trump campaign to justify their illegal surveillance.

The conversation between a drunken Papadopoulos and the Australian Ambassador is the supposed justification for investigating the Trump campaign, however, since Papadopoulos received the purported information from the FBI’s informant/spy, the conversation between Papadopoulos and the Australian Ambassador indisputably cannot be the impetus for the FBI’s illegal surveillance as the FBI was indisputably investigating members of the Trump campaign prior to the alleged disclosure by Papadopoulos, which is how the FBI’s spy came into contact with Papadopoulos in order to provide him with the evidence that the FBI would use to justify their illegal surveillance of the Trump campaign.

What this amounts to, is planting evidence on a suspect, and then claiming the evidence that you planted on the suspect provides you with probable cause for investigating and then prosecuting the suspect. This is as illegal as it get and everyone involved within the FBI and the Department of Justice absolutely need to be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law and incarcerated for the maximum period allowed by the law.

Furthermore, this needs to be followed up the food chain to discover not its purported origins, but its actual origins. Origins which no doubt go all the way to Barack Obama, through John Brennan and James Clapper. This is collusion at the highest levels of the Obama Administration to illegally influence the outcome of a presidential election, and when that failed, to engage in an illegal 18 US Code 2384 & 2385 attempted Coup d’état against the lawfully elected President of the United States of America Donald J Trump.

Yes, President Trump is 100 percent correct, this is the biggest political scandal in the history of the United States of America.

An interesting TED Talk…

I’m quiet the fan of the TED Talks. I watch a lot of them. They present interesting idea’s (sometime tin foil crap, and sometimes goofy stuff), but usually very well researched intelligent information is presented.

In this particular TED Talk one of Amazon’s first investors, Nick Hanauer speaks about the inequality in America’s economic system. His views are both contrary to the Reagan “Trickle Down Economics” that as a Conservative I was raised to believe in, and at the same time speak well of his understanding of America’s current economic crisis.

Nick makes one point that I not only agree with, but have myself been making to my friends and family for decades now. The only people who profit from keeping workers wages as low as possible, are the Plutocrats. Nick talks about Seattle’s raising of the minimum wage to $15.00 per hour. Something that every Conservative pundit has decried as a mortal blow to Seattle’s economy.

In the process of talking about this, Nick reminds us all of Henry Ford’s “$5.00 Dollar Day” innovation. Henry Ford made the conscience decision to pay his employees enough money that his employees could afford to purchase the very products that they were manufacturing. Anyone with two functional brain cells knows how that worked out.

Nick tip toed around the real solution he was proposing by using the euphemisms that the nations plutocrats needed to invest in the middle class infrastructure. What he was really saying, was that he and his fellow plutocrats need to pay everyone enough, so that like Henry Fords employees, the middle class can afford to purchase all of the products and services that they are employed to produce.

The reason that he tip toed around it was pretty obvious, he was telling his fellow plutocrats, we need to earn a smaller share of the profits from the corporations and businesses we own, and our employees need to earn a larger share in order for Capitalism to function.

Please watch the video, and let Nick tell you what he has to say in his own words. He is short on hard concrete details on how to convince his fellow plutocrats to do what he suggests, but its clear he understands the need to return a balance to not only America’s economic system, but the rest of the worlds as well.