Fuck fuck fuck.


I was going to put up a post tomorrow since it is my mothers birthday, she would have been 81. She died as those who read my blog here know, on September 15th 2016. Well, instead, I am writing this post today. My only surviving sibling had a hearth attack at work today. He is 50, and his wife and kids rushed off to the hospital without bothering to inform me.

That could I suppose be forgiven, except that I live with them and they had to rush right past me, which they did without saying a GOD DAMNED WORD TO ME.

My stepfather was the first to die, he went in 1996, my brother Guy went next in 2006, my sister in 2015, mom in 2016 and brother Cliff in 2017. My youngest brother is my sole surviving relative, and now he is in the hospital having just had a heart attack. To say that the last couple of years have sucked would be a profound understatement.

Advertisements

Wow… Could this possibly be true? Hillary Clinton with her hand cuffed behind her back?


I have to admit, I never really paid that much attention to Hillary’s arm and hand position in this video, but damn it, could what Jules67269 be suggesting be real?

Watch the video for yourself. I always assumed that the pneumonia/seizure story was legitimate, but, after watching it again, I must confess, it looks more like someone making a rather pathetic attempt to resist being placed in a vehicle under arrest than someone having a seizure.

Please let me make myself 100 percent clear here. I am no expert and have no inside knowledge on this subject. but taken in the light that Jules67269 suggests, this video suddenly takes on a whole different feel.

It also begs some profoundly disturbing questions. If Hillary Clinton actually does have her hands cuffed behind her back, exactly what has she been placed under arrest for? And if she was indeed arrested, does that lend credibility to the rumors that the boot she has been wearing supposedly for a broken toe, is in fact their to conceal a electronic ankle monitor?

This is all way above my pay grade, but given information that may be about to come to public light, i.e. the FISA FBI/DOJ abuse memo, one suddenly has to consider whether there is any veracity to this new rumor.

Happy New Year.


I don’t do New Years Resolutions, I think they are stupid and constitute an amazing degree of personal hubris. If you are going to make a change in your life for the better, do it. Do it every day of your life, don’t set yourself up for failure, set yourself up for success.

Most people make New Years Resolutions that they know they will never keep. They set their goal unrealistically high as if to give themselves permission to fail. If you give yourself permission to fail, you have succeeded in assuring that you will fail.

I have spent the majority of my life managing to fail spectacularly. I don’t think I have ever been accused of setting my sights to low. In fact, I have been told on many occasions that my biggest problem is that I consistently set my sights far above what I am actually capable of achieving.

I guess I really am one of those idiots who would rather fail trying to achieve something great, then to succeed doing something mundane. This personal character flaw has brought me a great deal of grief, it has also brought me a great deal of satisfaction. I say this in the exact same spirit that Thomas Edison once said, that “I did not fail 1000 times to create a functional light bulb, I succeeded 1000 times in identifying ways to not create a light bulb”.

With each of my failures, I identified things that I was not able to master. I learned a funny truth back in college when I was studying Physic’s. Its a funny, and painful truth that has never left me. Though, through experimentation and observation we slowly unravel the mysteries and laws that govern the Universe, what we do not ever do, is make the laws that govern the Universe.

The Physical Laws that govern the Universe pre-exist the human race. They existed long before we showed up on the scene, and will continue to exist long after we are gone. We “Discover” them, and hopefully learn to make use of them in ways the benefit the human race. But we do not get to decide what those laws are, or how they operate.

2017 has been in many ways an example of this funny truth. The election of Donald Trump as President of the United States of America was one of those events that mirror that truth. The Fifth Column Treasonous Marxist Media, the Democrat Party, the Deep State and the #NeverTrump imbeciles are all still running around as if it were Nov 6th 2016 and the possibility of Trump being elected was only one of many possible outcomes of the 2016 presidential election.

Trump has had an incredible first year. New York Times fake Conservative op-ed columnist and #NeverTrump imbecile Bret Stephens recently admitted as much.

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/12/30/nevertrumper-bret-stephens-whines-trumps-policy-victories-dont-matter-because-hes-a-bully/

Bret Stephens writes in the New York Times that even though he is happy with the policy achievements of the Trump Administration in its first year, he will never support Donald Trump because he is offended by the president’s personality:

Tax cuts. Deregulation. More for the military; less for the United Nations. The Islamic State crushed in its heartland. Assad hit with cruise missiles. Troops to Afghanistan. Arms for Ukraine. A tougher approach to North Korea. Jerusalem recognized as Israel’s capital. The Iran deal decertified. Title IX kangaroo courts on campus condemned. Yes to Keystone. No to Paris. Wall Street roaring and consumer confidence high.

And, of course, Neil Gorsuch on the Supreme Court. What, for a conservative, is there to dislike about this policy record as the Trump administration rounds out its first year in office?

That’s the question I keep hearing from old friends on the right who voted with misgiving for Donald Trump last year and now find reasons to like him. I admit it gives me pause. I agree with every one of the policy decisions mentioned above. But I still wish Hillary Clinton were president.

But I still wish Hillary Clinton were president.

Let that sink in for a few minutes. Despite what Trump has done, Stephens would still rather have Hillary Clinton as POTUS. Bret is a perfect example of how Conservative America has been betrayed for the last 5 decades. Yes, I did say “BETRAYED”. Various and sundry media outlets have trotted out an endless supply of so called “Conservative Intellectuals” who have lectured, cajolled, goaded, prodded chided and otherwise browbeat conservative American’s into accepting their liberal masturbatory fantasies of what should constitute Conservative American moral, ethical, and ideological principals and standards.

In my personal opinion, this betrayal began with William F Buckley Junior, an opinion, which I might add, I am not alone in sharing.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/william-f-buckley-jr-and-the-collapse-of-the-conservative-movement/2017/07/05/116202d4-55b8-11e7-b38e-35fd8e0c288f_story.html?utm_term=.84bb3310f742

Though for different reasons. Unlike his father, William F Buckley Junior, in my opinion was never an actual “Conservative”. For Junior, conservationism was, the family business, it was something that he was raised into as opposed to coming into on his own. He was, the aristocracy of the American Conservative Movement, an inherited position from which his wealth and social statues originated rather than one from which his principals drove him to.

His entire tenure as a political commentator, writer and editor at the National Review, was one of constant surrenders to liberal ideology in the name of advancing Conservative ideology. William F Buckley Junior began a movement of conservative death y a million little paper cuts. Always negotiating compromises that never benefited Conservative Ideology under the mistaken belief that Liberals would respect Conservatives if they were reasonable polite and diplomatic.

The political left was quick to seize upon the opportunity that Junior handed them. They saw the chance to move the “Overtone Window” of public perception on Conservative Ideology by placing atop the most powerful bully pulpits in America individuals purported to be Conservative Intellectuals, who were in fact, at best moderate liberals.

America had foisted upon it the likes of David Brooks and William Krystal. Members of a political aristocracy borne of the dying lamestream media. Once invincible gatekeepers of information who brokered no dissenting opinions, these pied pipers of pseudo Conservationism weekly trotted out their ever so carefully compromised and watered down versions of American Conservative Ideology.

Then something unexpected happened.

America’s conservatives woke up. But more importantly, they found their voices. They discovered “Social Media” where they could do what they had never been able to do before. They could get past the official gatekeepers of the holy flame. They cold say with a single unified voice that the fake aristocratic fake news fake Conservatives spokesholes like David Brooks and William Krystal did not speak for them. That they did not represent American Conservative Values.

It was the regular everyday American Conservatives that elected Donald Trump to be the 45th President of the United States of America. The GOP Establishment the Fifth Column Treasonous Marxist Media, the Fake Conservative #NeverTrump Imbeciles all fought tooth and nail hand in hand with the Democrat party to prevent Donald Trump from being elected.

But, like the laws of the Universe themselves, “Discovering” is all we actually get to do. They discovered that the average conservative American did not share their fake pseudo conservative ideology. Moreover, that the average conservative American was sick and tired of hearing their bullshit.

This is not to say that these purveyors of rarefied bullshit have seen the error of their ways, or given up their pretenses. No, far from it, they continue to double down on their arrogant narcissistic self inflicted stupidity. They cling desperately like rats to flotsam from a sinking ship. Braying like jackasses as they pound their no longer all powerful bully pulpits proclaiming their intellectual superiority over mere mortal average conservatives.

2017 will be remembered in history as the year in which the Pretenders to the Throne were cast aside. The year in which the self proclaimed Conservative Media’s Intellectuals were shown to be cheap imitations of the Emperor with no Cloths On.

The year when these fake Conservative Editors, pundits and commentators discovered a new natural law of the Universe, a law where they were no longer the gatekeepers of information and could no longer pick and choose which voices got heard, and which were ignored.

The Bret Stephens, David Brooks, William Krystal’s are still out there, still making their noise, still pretending that they are the true voices of Conservationism. But that is all that it is, pretension.

I have said this many times this year. Donald Trump is the first American elected to the office of President of the United States of America who entered that high office in possession of a genuine Super Power. President Donald Trump has the power to make people take off their carefully crafted masks of deceit and manipulation, and expose for the entire world to see, exactly who and what they really are. That may not seem like much of a Super Power, but in an age of universal deceit, that is actually one hell of a super power.

Fiat justitia ruat cælum is a Latin legal phrase, meaning “Let justice be done though the heavens fall.”


I just spent an hour writing my newest article. Then, in the blink of an eye, it disappeared. Literally less than 1 second later, the new, blank draft saved leaving no saved revision or previous draft to the article. Odd, since the article was about the Deep State’s corruption regarding the FBI, DOJ, CIA, NSA Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, James Clapper, Robert Mueller, Erick Holder, James Comey, Congressional collusion to sell Uranium to Rosatrom.

WordPress is suppose to save up to 25 revisions. Save was on, and the article was saved 15 or 20 times, but mysteriously, the article just disappeared as if it had never even existed. All of the revisions as if it had never been saved at all.

The Diversity Lottery, Isamic Jihad, #Antifa, BLM.


The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was to convince the world he didn’t exist.

America has a problem, it has a cancer eating away at its soul, and to complicate a bad situation, it has AIDS. This is a metaphorical statement. Yet like so many metaphorical statements, it is predicated upon a dangerous truth. America has many enemies both foreign and domestic. Even so, all of America’s enemies both foreign and domestic are incapable of destroying America.

The single greatest danger to America, is America itself.

At the end of the American Civil War America’s leading Academics and Politicians desperately sought for a way to heal the grievous wounds of that war. They looked around the world to see where they might find help doing that. Their attention was caught by a group of academic intelligencia in Europe who were promoting a “New” political ideology that promised to be able to heal the wounds of the Civil War.

That political Ideology was Marxism. In 1879 the teachings of Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels not only had not yet been put into practical application, but were very poorly understood by all save the most ardent of their followers. Few had dug deeply enough into Marx’s writing to know that what he was demanding, was a bloody violent purging of any and everyone who would not 100 percent commit to his vision of Utopia.

America has been subject to Rudi Dutschke/Antonio Gramsci long march through the institutions for far longer than Rudi Dutschke elucidation of the concept.

The long march through the institutions

The main influence on Dutschke’s thinking is commonly thought to be the work of Italian communist Antonio Gramsci who, while imprisoned by Mussolini, wrote about cultural hegemony and the need for a “war of position” to establish the conditions for a revolutionary “war of manoeuvre”.[2] Degroot also identifies Ernst Bloch as a major influence.[3] Bloch met Dutschke at Bad Boll in 1968 and admired his integrity and determination – qualities which he had written about in Das Prinzip Hoffnung (The Principle of Hope) as being essential for the achievement of utopia.[3]

Herbert Marcuse corresponded with Dutschke in 1971 to agree with this strategy, “Let me tell you this: that I regard your notion of the ‘long march through the institutions’ as the only effective way…”[4] In his 1972 book, Counterrevolution and Revolt, Marcuse wrote

To extend the base of the student movement, Rudi Dutschke has proposed the strategy of the long march through the institutions: working against the established institutions while working within them, but not simply by ‘boring from within’, rather by ‘doing the job’, learning (how to program and read computers, how to teach at all levels of education, how to use the mass media, how to organize production, how to recognize and eschew planned obsolescence, how to design, et cetera), and at the same time preserving one’s own consciousness in working with others.

Cultural hegemony

In Marxist philosophy, cultural hegemony is the domination of a culturally diverse society by the ruling class who manipulate the culture of that society—the beliefs, explanations, perceptions, values, and mores—so that their imposed, ruling-class worldview becomes the accepted cultural norm; the universally valid dominant ideology, which justifies the social, political, and economic status quo as natural and inevitable, perpetual and beneficial for everyone, rather than as artificial social constructs that benefit only the ruling class.[1][2]

In philosophy and in sociology, the term cultural hegemony has denotations and connotations derived from the Ancient Greek word ἡγεμονία (hegemonia) indicating leadership and rule. In politics, hegemony is the geopolitical method of indirect imperial dominance, with which the hegemon (leader state) rules subordinate states, by the threat of intervention, an implied means of power, rather than by direct military force, that is, invasion, occupation, and annexation.[3]

Sen Chuck Schumer’s Diversity Lottery, Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton’s importation of Muslims into America, George Soros #Antifa and BLM are all threads connected to Karl Marx’s political ideology which demands a bloody violent destruction of American Capitalistic society.

When Weather Underground terrorist and Murder William “Bill” Ayer’s (Barack Obama’s political Mentor) wrote in his Marxist Manifesto “Prairie Fires” that 50 million American’s would need to be put into extermination camps and murdered wholesale because they would not willingly submit to a Marxist Socialist Coup over America he was not kidding nor using hyperbole, he was deadly serious.

The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was to convince the world he didn’t exist.

The deadly violent circumstances and civil unrest demanded by Marxist ideology isn’t the greatest threat America faces. The single greatest threat America faces, is an American public both unaware of what is happening in its midst, and unwilling to accept the truth about what is happening.

Most American’s live safely cocooned in a false bubble of belief that what they are witnessing is just a political disagreement between Republicans and Democrats over who controls the purse strings of the American economy. With trillions of dollars at stake, they accept as fait accompli that those directly involved will get ruthlessly vicious in their language and tactics. Politic’s in America is seen by the vast majority of what the more aggressive on both sides call the “Low Information Voter’s” as Theater of the Obscene.

America is suffering from “It can’t Happen Here” syndrome. After WWII, the entire world looked at Adolph Hitler’s Nazi Germany and asked, how could the German People have allowed that to happen. In the 1960’s Yale Psychology Professor Stanley Milgram even went so far as to run a series of experiments designed to uncover exactly how it could happen. His experiments have been called both inaccurate as well as unethical. Mostly because of how disturbing the results were.

Somewhere between the horrors of Hitler’s Nazi Germany and the disturbing results of Milgrams experiments the general psyche in America reacted by proclaiming “That could never happen here”. The vast majority of American genuinely believe that most people are good decent people and that they would never tolerate the kind of evil that came to symbolize Nazi Germany.

What they fail to grasp, (Odd considering that even the American Revolution itself is an example of this) is, that it does not require the approve or support of the majority of any nation for a violent deadly revolution to overthrow that nations government.

Saul Alinsky, Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama’s spiritual mentor understood this.

The community organizer is given eleven rules for guidance with respect to ethics.

(1) The first rule is “One’s concern with the ethics of means and ends varies inversely with ones personal interest in the issue.” That is to say, the more you care about the issue the less you should care about the methods you use to fight for it.

(2) “judgment of the ethics of means and ends is dependant on the political position of those making the judgment.”

(3) “in war the end justifies almost any means.”

(4) “judgment must be mad in the context of the times…” “ethical standards must be elastic to stretch in the times.”

(5) “concern with ethics increases with the number of means available…”

(6) “the less important the end…the more one can afford to engage in ethical evaluation of means

(7) “success or failure is a mighty determinate of ethics.”

(8) the “morality of means depends on whether the means is being deployed at the time of imminent defeat or imminent victory.”

(9) “any effective means is automatically judged by the opposition as unethical.”

(10) “do what you can with what you have and clothe it with moral arguments.”

(11) Whatever your mission “goals must be phrased in terms like Liberty, Equality, Fraternity, or Of the Common Welfare or Pursuit of Happiness or Bread and Peace”.

The perennial question of whether ends justify means is a discussion for those who stand on the sides as observers accomplishing nothing themselves. Ethical considerations should not be allowed to interfere with success.

It only takes 2% of a society or nation willingly to commit any atrocity required to overthrow a society or government and 98% of that society or nation to sit by and do nothing.

America is already fighting a second bloody civil/revolutionary war and their have already been hundreds of casualties. The majority of American have already been deceived into thinking that these casualties are the result of “Radical Islamic Terrorism” or “Civil Unrest” caused by racial injustices.

The truth is, that what is happening is that individuals in America are following Karl Marx and Saul Alinsky’s tactics. They are willfully and with a full forethought of malice creating the violence and civil unrest that Karl Marx demanded in order to “Fundamentally Transform” America into a Marxist Socialist Nation.

The majority of Americans have chosen to believe that “It Can’t Happen Here”. BREAKING NEWS FLASH: It can and it will happen, you will either wake up to this reality now, or wake up to a Marxist Socialist America, but in either case, you will eventually be forced to wake up.

Remember, it only takes 2% to overthrow any nation while the remaining 98% do nothing.

Operation Fast and Furious Ver. 2.0?


Conspiracy theories should always be regarded with great skepticism until substantive evidence moves them from unlikely speculation to substantiated fact. Given this caveat, historically documented events must also be given consideration when any radical theory is presented as a possibly explanation for an event that seems to have little information to explain it.

There are a couple of very disturbing paragraphs in the following article providing a hypothetical explanation for the actions of Las Vegas gunman Stephen Paddock. Disturbing because they do in fact have more than one historically well documented precedent.

Hotel Guest Next To Vegas Shooter Just Blew Investigation WIDE OPEN With What He Said He Saw

— snip —

An unproven theory currently being circulated by someone claiming to be an FBI agent is downright chilling, and supports the theory that there was in fact more than one shooter. In an email that was supposedly sent by an FBI agent seeking to remain anonymous, the text reveals a conspiracy of Benghazi-level proportions. The shooter was actually a FBI agent who was involved in a gun running scheme similar to what happened in Libya. But things unfortunately didn’t go as planned. A screenshot of the email is below, whose text reads:

“The LVMPD knows the motive behind the attack, but the FBI will not allow us to release the motive because it implicates the FBI in illegal arms deals and supplying arms to ISIS terrorists within U.S. borders.”

“Stephen Paddock was an undercover FBI agent who participated in multiple illegal arms deals in the Las Vegas area in a gun running entrapment scheme similar to Fast and Furious. Paddock thought he was engaging in another routine arms transfer, but ISIS operatives who were going to meet him learned about the entrapment scheme and Paddock’s true identity. They killed him and carried out the massacre, and then fled the scene.”

The email concluded that people within the police department are “disgusted” and are “pushing for this information to be released to the public.”

While this email cannot be confirmed as being written by an actual FBI agent at this time, this theory makes perfect sense. It’s entirely possible that this was a gun-running scheme gone wrong, and once ISIS realized they were being set up, they decided to retaliate. Remember that ISIS immediately claimed responsibility for the attack, although they wouldn’t provide any proof as to why.

— snip —

Yes, I know, at first glance this is one humdinger of a tin foil hat conspiracy theory. However, that said, the fact that the FBI gun running fiasco known as “Operation Fast and Furious” is still languishing in Deep State protective custody instead of being dragged kicking and screaming into the light of day and prosecuted plus the fact that we have since learned that “Operation Fast and Furious” was not a one off rouge FBI operation means that as far fetched and tin foil hat conspiracy theoryish as this might at first glance seem, it cannot be disregarded out of hand.

Hillary Clinton’s State Department was running guns through Libya into Syria and is mostly likely the real reason for Benghazi, another mega scandal that instead of being dragged kicking and screaming into the light is still languishing in Deep State protective custody.

So as disturbing as this theory is, and yes it really is, there is well documented historical precedent for exactly this kind, type and level of incompetence and bad judgement on the part of the FBI and even more incriminatory, their ability and willfulness to knowingly and willfully commit felony crimes to cover such disastrous failed operations up.

Take the theory with a few pounds of salt, but remember, the FBI has done this in the past.

Dr Seuss WAS NOT A Racist.


Back in the early 1980’s I attended college for the first time. To do so, I worked as a gardener/landscaper. ONE OF THE Clients the company I worked for was a gentleman named Theodor Geisel, the vast majority of you know him as Dr Seuss.

When I was growing up in San Diego, California back in the 1970’s, San Diego was a military town, and a very conservative one at that. My father as it just so happens was a career enlisted man in the United States Navy. I grew up your typical military brat. My father was as patriotic and conservative as it is possible to be.

Meeting Dr Seuss, whose books and TV specials I grew up with and loved was something of a dream come true, but also a rather shocking wake up call regarding the nature of reality and politics in America. Theodor Geisel was not a Conservative. He was what today is described as a Classical Capital L Liberal.

Dr Seuss would meet me at the side gate to his house promptly at 7am twice a month still wearing his housecoat and slippers. Since he lived in La Jolla in a very expensive community firing up my lawn-care equipment at 7am, while technically legal was frowned upon.

Oddly, it was Theodor who insisted we get there at 7am. His solution to the unofficial ban on lawn-care equipment at 7am, was for us to sit and have English muffins and coffee/tea until 8am. During this time we would discuss world events while listening to the BBC on his radio and discuss what he wanted to do in his yard. (His back yard could well and justifiably be described as a traditional English Arboretum)

During the two years I was privileged to spend that hour sitting and talking with Dr Seuss on those mornings, we spoke on an enormous range of subjects. To be honest, many of the idea’s that Theodor espoused were more than a little disquieting to me. I will not get into what those idea’s were, suffice it to say I was a young conservative being exposed to Liberal idea’s for the first time and did not agree with many of the things that Theodor Geisel said ad believed.

I spent many hours talking with him and regardless of whether I agreed with him or not, never ever did Theodor Geisel i.e. Dr Seuss ever respond to my disagreements with him with anything other than a combination of RESPECT and Humor.

The Marxist Lefts attack on Theodor Geisel/Dr Seuss’s personal character, his moral and ethical make-up is so far beyond the pale as to virtually constitute a crime against humanity. I do not care how much you hate President Donald Trump, casting such vile reprehensible aspersions upon Dr Seuss’s character is disgusting and utterly unacceptable.

Theodor Geisel was a true and genuine champion of human rights, a defender of the defenseless, and an opponent of oppression of all kinds. Dr Seuss was one of the kindest, gentlest, most caring and loving human beings I have ever been privileged to meet.

To this day I am and remain an ardent Conservative. Dr Seuss did not change that. But my discussions with him did impact many of my ideological perceptions. I am not prone to defending Liberals and will never defend a Marxist. Theodor Geisel was a Classical Liberal, more conservative in many ways than those so called conservatives collectively known as “Conservative Inc.”

I am angered and insulted down to my soul that the left has besmirched Dr Seuss with these false and utterly repulsive allegations that he, or any of his work were in any way, shape or form racist or oppressive. Dr Seuss was not only not a racist, that assertion is about as far from reality or the truth as it is possible to get. It embodies the lefts “The End Justifies the Means” corrupt vile and evil ideology and does not nor should it even be imagined or entertained to exist in any reality inhabited by Theodor Geisel/Dr Seuss.