Democracy Dies in Darkness.


Washington Post Unveils New Slogan: ‘Democracy Dies in Darkness’

The left-leaning Washington Post has introduced a new slogan in the age of President Donald Trump: “Democracy Dies in Darkness.”

The slogan, which was coined by the newspaper’s former editor Bob Woodward, is now center stage on the site’s homepage.

On Wednesday, the New York Times also unveiled a new marketing campaign entitled “The Truth,” to fight Donald Trump, suggesting that the paper will only publish truthful journalism whilst Trump and the new administration continue to propagate lies.

The United States of America is not and never has been a Democracy. The United States is and always was a Constitutional Republic.

Those dedicated to Marxism, those who have infiltrated our nation with the intent to destroy our Constitutional Republic have for over a century done everything in their power to confuse and deceive as many American citizens as they could into believing that America is a Democracy.

They have done so because only in a Democracy can they use that Democracy to steal the government from the citizens of the United States of America and fundamentally transform our Constitutional Republic into a Marxist Republic.

America’s Founding Father’s were adamantly opposed to America being a Democracy because they understood that in a Democracy, the majority could at any time vote itself into being a tyranny. Hence the very reason that they created a Constitutional Republic with a series of checks and Balances designed specifically to prevent exactly that from happening.

If the New York Times only publishes the Truth, perhaps they will start by admitting that their Pulitzer award winning Journalist Walter Duranty was actually a Marxist agitator and Stalin apologist. Yea, the New York Times hasn’t told the truth in 90 years, and isn’t about to start doing so any time soon.

American Conservative Values; The United States Constitution: The Amendments.


American Conservatives do not blindly believe that the United States Constitution is perfect. But we do believe, despite its shortcomings, that of all the forms of government ever tried by human beings on planet Earth, it comes closest. Democracy is a guaranteed path to self destruction and oblivion. Which is why America’s Founding Father’s rejected it and instead chose as the form of Government for America that of a Constitutional Republic.

The United States Constitution is unique amongst all documents that proceed it. Unlike every other form of Government that proceeded it, its main focus is not to grant government authority over men, but to set the boundaries and restrict the authority of itself. “We find these truths to be self evident”.

The Constitution of the United States of America was established upon the bedrock foundation that every American Citizen has certain inalienable rights that existed before the Government of the United States of America or the Constitution of the United States of America came into existence. That the Government of the United States of America absolutely could not restrict, infringe upon or remove.

Unlike other forms of Government, the United States Constitution very specifically and explicitly lays out in detail what the United States Government cannot do.

Amendment 1

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

Amendment 1 very specifically and explicitly tell the government that it absolutely will not decide for the citizens of America what they will or will not believe, what they will or will not say in public about what they believe, what they will or will not come together peacefully to discuss or protest, or whether they may or may not assemble in public to demand that the government change.

The key phrase here is the second strongest phrase used in the entire United States Constitution. “Shall make no law”. In other words, keep your god damned hands off of this. The only phrase in the United states constitution that employs stronger language, is found in the very next amendment.

Amendment 2

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

A hermeneutical analysis of the final phrase in the second amendment shows that it is in fact the strongest phrase in the entire United States Constitution.

Shall not.

MUST This word, or the terms “REQUIRED” or “SHALL”, mean that the definition is an absolute requirement of the specification. The ASQ section on use of “shall” states: “This word implies obligation and is traditionally used by laws and regulations.”

Infringe

infringed; infringing

transitive verb

1
: to encroach upon in a way that violates law or the rights of another

Infringe, as it just so happens, is an old word. The exact meaning refers to property rights. Its literal meaning, and the one indisputable intended by the Founding Fathers, means to walk up to a property boundary, and stick a single finger across that property boundary. The second you have stuck your finger over that property boundary you are guilty of infringement.

The United States Congress, Supreme Court and Executive Office were absolutely completely and unequivalently bared, restricted in any way shape or form regulating or prohibiting any American Citizen from owning any firearm. There are no reasonable regulations of firearms which short of an article 5 Constitutional convention to change the United States Constitution, are acceptable under the United States Constitution. Anyone who tells you otherwise, simply is not an American Conservative. Moreover, what they are telling you is in direct and indisputable violation of the United States Constitution.

The story the treasonous Deep State and Media do not want you to know.


House Dem IT Staffers Owed Money To Hezbollah-Connected Fugitive

Congressional aides suspected of criminally misusing their access to House computer systems owed $100,000 to an Iraqi politician who is wanted by U.S. authorities and has been linked to Hezbollah, the Iranian-backed Middle Eastern terrorist outfit.

Imran Awan and four of his relatives were employed as information technology (IT) aides by dozens of House Democrats, including members of the intelligence, foreign affairs and homeland security committees. The aides’ administrator-level IT access was terminated earlier this month amid a criminal probe by U.S. Capitol Police of a suspected security breach, including an off-site server housing congressional data.

There is so much more right there than meets the eye.

The story is getting minimal coverage in the media. But even that coverage is highly deceptive. These five IT people worked for a number of the most classified and sensitive committees in the United States Government. They had the highest level of administrative access to the servers of those committees.

Imran Awan and his relatives were among the most highly place moles known to have ever penetrated the United States Government. They were placed there by the same Democrats, that thought Hillary Clinton’s private unsecured server was a good idea. The same Democrats who decided that it was ok to withhold classified national security information from the lawfully elected President of the United States of America. The same Democrats who are currently willfully, knowingly and intentionally violating multiple sections of 18 U.S. Code Chapter 115.

18 U.S. Code Chapter 115 – TREASON, SEDITION, AND SUBVERSIVE ACTIVITIES

prev | next

§ 2381 – Treason
§ 2382 – Misprision of treason
§ 2383 – Rebellion or insurrection
§ 2384 – Seditious conspiracy
§ 2385 – Advocating overthrow of Government
§ 2386 – Registration of certain organizations
§ 2387 – Activities affecting armed forces generally
§ 2388 – Activities affecting armed forces during war
§ 2389 – Recruiting for service against United States
§ 2390 – Enlistment to serve against United States
§ 2391 – Repealed. Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, § 330004(13), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2142]

18 U.S. Code § 2385 – Advocating overthrow of Government

Whoever knowingly or willfully advocates, abets, advises, or teaches the duty, necessity, desirability, or propriety of overthrowing or destroying the government of the United States or the government of any State, Territory, District or Possession thereof, or the government of any political subdivision therein, by force or violence, or by the assassination of any officer of any such government; or

Whoever, with intent to cause the overthrow or destruction of any such government, prints, publishes, edits, issues, circulates, sells, distributes, or publicly displays any written or printed matter advocating, advising, or teaching the duty, necessity, desirability, or propriety of overthrowing or destroying any government in the United States by force or violence, or attempts to do so; or

Whoever organizes or helps or attempts to organize any society, group, or assembly of persons who teach, advocate, or encourage the overthrow or destruction of any such government by force or violence; or becomes or is a member of, or affiliates with, any such society, group, or assembly of persons, knowing the purposes thereof—

Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both, and shall be ineligible for employment by the United States or any department or agency thereof, for the five years next following his conviction.

If two or more persons conspire to commit any offense named in this section, each shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both, and shall be ineligible for employment by the United States or any department or agency thereof, for the five years next following his conviction.

As used in this section, the terms “organizes” and “organize”, with respect to any society, group, or assembly of persons, include the recruiting of new members, the forming of new units, and the regrouping or expansion of existing clubs, classes, and other units of such society, group, or assembly of persons.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 808; July 24, 1956, ch. 678, § 2, 70 Stat. 623; Pub. L. 87–486, June 19, 1962, 76 Stat. 103; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, § 330016(1)(N), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2148.)

The Deep State and the Mainstream Media are co-conspirators in an attempted Coup of the lawful Government of the United States of America. There is simply no other way to say this. Nothing else would be truthful or accurate.

The story of the espionage committed by Imran Awan and his relatives is merely one of the chapters in the Coup attempt.

President Trump is right, the Media is the enemy, and they admit it.


President Trump is right, the Media is the enemy, and they admit it.

Controlling “exactly what people think” is the job of the media, MSNBC’s Mika Brzezinski boldly declared Wednesday morning.

Mika is not saying anything radical here, she is saying what 95% of the propagandists in the Fifth Column Treasonous Marxist Media all agree is the truth. Their job is not to report facts, it is to control what you think. I could go into a long explanation of exactly what the implications of Mika’s statement are. However, doing so, I think would only dilute the significance of what she said.

The End Justifies the Means. This it needs to be 100 percent perfectly clear, is the only moral or ethical guideline that anyone in the Fifth Column Treasonous Marxist Media subscribes to. They will tell whatever lies, create and push whatever “Fake News” is required for them to control what you think.

The Fifth Column Treasonous Marxist Media needs to be held accountable for knowingly and willfully deceiving the American people. The freedom of the press must not be abridged, but the media must also face profound and significant legal consequences whenever they knowingly and willfully spin, twist distort or outright create fake news.

Andrew Brietbart before his untimely passing called the media, the most dangerous enemy America ever faced. He was 100 percent correct. They are no longer the Fourth Estate, they are now, by their very own admission, a Fifth Column Enemy, just as President Trump said they were.

The Treason of the Deep State.


What is the Deep State? Have you ever stopped to ponder that question? Have you even ever heard of the Deep State before?

The Deep State, is the 21,995,000 unelected people employed by federal, state and local government in the United States. They are the permanent bureaucratic oligarchy that really rule the United States of America. Elected officials come and go, but this permanent bureaucratic oligarchy remains unencumbered by any need or requirement to suffer the will or whim of the American Electorate.

Once upon a time, these unelected bureaucrats were very careful to remain nonpartisan and unbiased knowing that they would have to work within the policy decisions of whichever parties candidate took up residence at 1600 Pennsylvania Ave. This all took a dramatic and terrible turn during the Clinton Administration. The Clinton’s stacked the senior administration positions with their fellow Marxist travelers who were loyal only to their fellow Marxist travelers. But even more importantly, who based all of their hiring and firing policies upon that fellow Marxist traveler status.

These hyper partisan Marxist bureaucrats were a major pain in GW Bush’s ass, but they had not yet gained the strength in numbers or power to effectively pull off a political coup within the Deep State. That would have to wait until Barack Obama. Despite the well known and obvious animus between Barack Obama and the Clinton’s, both were committed Marxists. Their differences were along the line of those separating Stalin and Trotsky, their disagreements were not so much political ideology, as personal disagreements in who should lead the party.

During Barack Obama’s 8 year tenure at 1600 Pennsylvania Ave he doubled down on Bill and Hillary Clinton’s practice of packing the Deep State senior administrative bureaucrats with Marxist fellow travelers. So much so that today, these unaccountable unelected bureaucrats now believe that they have reached the tipping point to where a political coup is their to conduct at will.

We are witnessing this in real time as these unaccountable and unelected senior administrative bureaucrats are actively committing treason against the Constitution of the United States of America and We The People. We are seeing it in the actions of the members of the so called Intelligence Community who are actively denying important information, feeding false or misleading information to, or leaking sensitive information about the Trump Administration.

We are seeing it with the various senior administrative bureaucrats who believe that they have the right and authority to blatantly ignore the policy positions and directives of the Trump Administration.

Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, a strong Trump backer, warned that the “bureaucracy is more hostile than any in modern times.” He said the storm surrounding Mr. Flynn is “a warning of how hostile their bureaucratic and media opponents will be.”

“The president isn’t an emperor,” said Derek Chollet, who worked in the Pentagon, State Department and National Security Council in the Obama administration. “The president doesn’t sign things and they get implemented. The system has to enforce that. And if you don’t have processes and enforcement mechanisms in place, it’s going to be really hard to get anything done.”

What Derek Chollet is describing is a political coup implemented from within the Deep State. The exact same kind of insubordination that resulted in temporary Attorney General Sally Yates being removed from office. The same attitude of entitlement that resulted in Craig Deare being relieved from his position of authority with the National Security Council.

Make no mistake about it, what you are witnessing is an attempt at a coup by unaccountable and unelected senior bureaucrats within the Deep State. This attempted coup, is straight up treason, and everyone involved should be subjected to prosecution under 18 U.S. Code Chapter 115. Now mind you, before you say to yourself, that my tin foil hat is on to tightly, or that I’m off my rocker, I am far from being the only individual making this accusation against the Deep State senior administrative bureaucrats.

Trump and the Deep State: Attempted Coup by the “Intelligence Community”? Kucinich, Greenwald
Leading Progressives Kucinich and Greenwald: Even Americans Who Hate Trump Should Defend Him Against Attempted Coup by the “Deep State” … A Coup Which Is Being Attempted “So That This Military Industrial Intel Axis Can Cash In”

Is Michael Flynn the first casualty of a “deep state” coup? It’s not unthinkable

“A soft coup by the US Deep State”: Flynn’s Head Rolls… Is Trump’s Next?

Beginning of the end of the US Deep State? Soft coup collapsing as CIA produces no evidence of Russian hacking

This attempted coup, is being supported by the Mainstream Media, the indisputable evidence of this is the ongoing war between the Mainstream Media and President Trump. It is also being supported by the majority of the Democrat Party and a number of senior member of the Republican Party.

If President Donald Trump cannot overcome this attempted coup, then America’s Constitutional Republic is finished. Someone very seriously needs to grab Attorney General Jeff Sessions by his lapels and slap the living crap out of him. It is time for the Attorney General’s Office to aggressive begin prosecuting these Deep State senior administration bureaucrats under 18 U.S. Code Chapter 115. Merely dismissing them from their positions will not be enough to dissuade others within the Deep State from making the same coup attempts when they think they see the opportunity to effective get away with it.

Grief


I was accused recently of admitting that I had a serious drinking problem. I won’t say who the asshole who made this accusations was. He’s a complete and total asshole. He based this accusation on my admitting that I was drinking and smoking to much of late. This is a fact that I do not deny.

It is also a fact that must be taken in its correct context.

It is not an admission of a serious drinking problem. It is an admission that I am in extreme pain and grief and not dealing with it as well as my own personal standards demand.

Why am I in extreme pain? 3 members of my family had died in less than two years. My sister on April 12th of 2015, my mother on September 15th of 2016 and my brother on February 6th of 2017.

I come from a family of seven (eight), two (technically three) parents and five kids. My step father passed away in 1996, my birth father in 2001, one of my brothers in 2006, my sister in 2015, my mother in 2016 and another brother in 2017. My family now consists of me and my youngest brother.

My entire life has been dedicated to my family, nothing has ever been more important to me. Now, with the exception of my youngest brother, they are all dead, 3 of them within the last 2 years. No, I am not dealing with this like a perfect saint. I am scared, confused and in more pain than I have any ability to express.

Yes, I am smoking more than a pack of cigarettes a day and drinking more than a pint of beer a day. For me, yes, that is way more than I should. Am I a off my fucking rocker crazy alcoholic? No I am not, do I have a drinking problem, no I do not. What I have is a problem with grief and pain. I am not and never have been a very emotional person. Right now, my emotions are running wild and threatening my very sanity.

I am angry, hurt and in pain, and I am having trouble dealing with what I am going through. If you cannot understand this, then very kindly go fuck yourself. But do not spread lies about me to justify your own asshole behavior.

CPAC=Communists Pretending to be American Conservatives


CPAC 2017 is rapidly approaching. What is approaching even more rapidly, is the unmasking of who is behind CPAC. It is not who you think it is. The so called Conservative Political Action Conference is a political action conference it just isn’t as its name insists, a Conservative political action conference.

The evidence of this is extremely telling.

This year CPAC ignored many of the top Trump supporters who helped get him elected.
These top election influencers will not be speaking at CPAC despite their work to get Trump elected.

–Gavin McInnes
–Mike Cernovich
–Milo Yiannopoulos
–Stefan Molyneux
–Bill Mitchell
–Paul Joseph Watson
–Jack Posobiec
–Matt Drudge
–Infowars
–Gateway Pundit
–Ann Coulter? (if she is speaking she is not listed)
–Wikileaks…

Instead the speaker list includes this committed #NeverTrumpers:
–Katie Pavlich
–Dana Loesch
–Ted Cruz
–Carly Fiorina
–Michael Reagan
–Mark Levin

CPAC is run by a group of Marxist/Liberal infiltrators.

infiltrator

a person who secretly becomes part of a group in order to get information or to influence the way the group thinks or behaves:

The biggest problem with any infiltrator or group of infiltrators is that usually by the time you realize that one of them has infiltrated your group or organization they have already done a great deal of damage. Damage that can take years to identify and correct.

America has been under attack by Marxist/Socialist/Communist infiltrators for over 100 years. This attack actually began back in the 1870’s when America’s top Politicians and Academics got together and sought a plan to heal the wounds caused by the American Civil War. What they were trying to do was rational, logical and noble. The problem was, what they did.

In their attempt to heal the wounds of the Civil War, they concluded that they needed the assistance of third party unbiased arbitrators. So they made the decision to reach out to Europe’s top Academician’s and Intelligencia. A very large majority of Europe’s top Academician’s and Intelligencia that responded to their pleas for help, just happened to be the acolytes and disciples of Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels.

It must be borne in mind, that at the time (the 1870’s) Marxism and its derivatives Socialism and Communism had not actually been put in practice anywhere. It is incredibly difficult to rationally or logically argue that Marxism and its derivatives Socialism and Communism do not look good on paper. The wording and phrasing in Das Kapital very skillfully and artfully disguise the real meaning and intentions of Marxism.

It is therefore not surprising that America’s most powerful and influential politicians and academicians did not understand what it was they were bringing to America’s shores when they imported these acolytes and disciples of Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels. They believed that they were importing powerful and brilliant minds who would create methods of healing the wounds caused by America’s Civil War, when in fact, they were importing individuals whose sole and exclusive goal, was the destruction of America’s Constitutional Republic.

Thus begun the Marxist slow march of infiltration through America’s most powerful institutes. Academia, the Legal system, the Political system, the Deep States and the Fourth Estate and the Church.

This slow march infiltration was well underway when in the 1940’s the Soviet Union’s KGB began its own infiltration and subversion program. It was this well established web of Marxist/Socialist/Communist infiltrators that the KGB reached out to and tapped to infiltrate the “Manhattan Project”. It was this well established web of Marxist/Socialist/Communist infiltrators who were being added and abetted by the KGB that were the real focus behind Sen. Joseph McCarthy’s warning of Communist infiltration of the American Government i.e., the Deep State.

It was this well established web of Marxist/Socialist/Communist infiltrators in Academia, politics the Media and the legal system and the church who worked so hard and successfully to assassinate Sen. Joseph McCarthy’s personal and professional character and paint him as some kind of delusional crazy conspiracy nut job.

It was not until after the fall of the Soviet Union and the release of the Vassiliev Notebooks followed shortly in 1996 by the United States very own NSA documents known as the Venona files that Sen. Joseph McCarthy was proven to have been 100 percent correct. That despite his vilification by the well established web of Marxist/Socialist/Communist infiltrators he was not a crazy delusion conspiracy nut job.

By this time, you must be wondering, how the hell does this have anything to do with CPAC?

The answer to that, is nearly as convoluted as the trail leading up to this point, and it hinges on this statement.

The biggest problem with any infiltrator or group of infiltrators is that usually by the time you realize that one of them has infiltrated your group or organization they have already done a great deal of damage. Damage that can take years to identify and correct.

For over a century, America has suffered from a collective delusion. One foisted upon America by this very cabal of Marxist/Socialist/Communist infiltrators. That delusion was/is, “It can’t happen here”. Well, it did happen here, and it happened right under everybody’s noses.

The first great American institutes that the Marxists infiltrated were Academia and the Fourth Estate. From their perches within Academia and the Fourth Estate they began a covert program of propaganda and indoctrination. That program of propaganda and indoctrination went into super overdrive in the 1960’s as Marxist College professors used their bully pulpits and positions of moral and ethical authority to transform innocent and eager to please naive young college students into Marxist activists and revolutionaries.

They placed their greatest efforts into indoctrinating three very specific academic disciplines. Education, Jurisprudence, and Journalism. Education majors, i.e., the nations future teachers, Lawyers and Journalists were all heavily indoctrinated into Marxism by being taught the Marxist Educational Theories.

From the mid 1970’s, when the 1960’s Marxist radicals and activists graduated from college and entered the workforce, (especially those who went into teaching), nearly every student of the American primary educational system has been heavily indoctrinated into Marxism, and the vast majority of them are totally unaware of this fact.

1. The reproduction of class inequality

In school, the middle classes use their material and cultural capital to ensure that their children get into the best schools and the top sets. This means that the wealthier pupils tend to get the best education and then go onto to get middle class jobs. Meanwhile working class children are more likely to get a poorer standard of education and end up in working class jobs. In this way class inequality is reproduced

2. The Legitimation of class inequality

Marxists argue that in reality money determines how good an education you get, but people do not realize this because schools spread the ‘myth of meritocracy’ – in school we learn that we all have an equal chance to succeed and that our grades depend on our effort and ability. Thus if we fail, we believe it is our own fault. This legitimates or justifies the system because we think it is fair when in reality it is not.

3. Teaching the skills future capitalist employers need

In ‘Schooling in Capitalist America’ (1976) Bowles and Gintis suggest that there is a correspondence between values learnt at school and the way in which the workplace operates. The values, they suggested, are taught through the ‘Hidden Curriculum’. The Hidden Curriculum consists of those things that pupils learn through the experience of attending school rather than the main curriculum subjects taught at the school. So pupils learn those values that are necessary for them to tow the line in menial manual jobs, as outlined below

SCHOOL VALUES Corresponds to EXPLOITATIVE LOGIC OF THE WORKPLACE

Passive subservience (of pupils to teachers) corresponds to Passive subservience of workers to managers

Acceptance of hierarchy (authority of teachers) corresponds to Authority of managers

Motivation by external rewards (grades not learning) corresponds to being Motivated by wages not the joy of the job

Evaluations of the Traditional Marxist Perspective on Education

Positive

There is an overwhelming wealth of evidence that schools do reproduce class inequality because the middle classes do much better in education because they have more cultural capital (Reay) and because the 1988 Education Act benefited them (Ball Bowe and Gewirtz)
Conversely, WWC children less likely to go to university because of fear of debt (Connor et al)

Right there you can clearly see the roots of the Social Justice Warrior movement.

It wasn’t just their indoctrination into Marxism via Marxist Educational Theory, it was also their education into radical activist strategies and tactics taught to the young college student like Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton and William Ayer’s by the Marxist Revolutionary and Radical Community Activist Saul Alinsky.

Rules for Radicals.

1. The Purpose

In this book we are concerned with how to create mass organizations to seize power and give it to the people; to realize the democratic dream of equality, justice, peace…. “Better to die on your feet than to live on your knees.’ This means revolution.” p.3

“Radicals must be resilient, adaptable to shifting political circumstances, and sensitive enough to the process of action and reaction to avoid being trapped by their own tactics and forced to travel a road not of their choosing.” p.6

“A Marxist begins with his prime truth that all evils are caused by the exploitation of the proletariat by the capitalists. From this he logically proceeds to the revolution to end capitalism, then into the third stage of reorganization into a new social order of the dictatorship of the proletariat, and finally the last stage — the political paradise of communism.” p.10

“An organizer working in and for an open society is in an ideological dilemma to begin with, he does not have a fixed truth — truth to him is relative and changing; everything to him is relative and changing…. To the extent that he is free from the shackles of dogma, he can respond to the realities of the widely different situations….” pp.10-11

2. Of Means and Ends [Forget moral or ethical considerations]

“The end is what you want, the means is how you get it. Whenever we think about social change, the question of means and ends arises. The man of action views the issue of means and ends in pragmatic and strategic terms. He has no other problem; he thinks only of his actual resources and the possibilities of various choices of action. He asks of ends only whether they are achievable and worth the cost; of means, only whether they will work. … The real arena is corrupt and bloody.” p.24

“The means-and-ends moralists, constantly obsessed with the ethics of the means used by the Have-Nots against the Haves, should search themselves as to their real political position. In fact, they are passive — but real — allies of the Haves…. The most unethical of all means is the non-use of any means… The standards of judgment must be rooted in the whys and wherefores of life as it is lived, the world as it is, not our wished-for fantasy of the world as it should be….” pp.25-26

“The third rule of ethics of means and ends is that in war the end justifies almost any means….” p.29

“The seventh rule… is that generally success or failure is a mighty determinant of ethics….” p.34

“The tenth rule… is you do what you can with what you have and clothe it with moral garments…. It involves sifting the multiple factors which combine in creating the circumstances at any given time… Who, and how many will support the action?… If weapons are needed, then are appropriate d weapons available? Availability of means determines whether you will be underground or above ground; whether you will move quickly or slowly…” p.36

4. The Education of the Organizer

“To the organizer, imagination… is the dynamism that starts and sustains him in his whole life of action as an organizer. It ignites and feeds the force that drives him to organize for change….
“The organizer knows that the real action is in the reaction of the opposition. To realistically appraise and anticipate the probable reactions of the enemy, he must be able to identify with them, too, in his imagination, and foresee their reactions to his actions….
“The organizers searching with a free and open mind void of certainty, hating dogma, finds laughter not just a way to maintain his sanity but also a key to understanding life.”pp.74-75

“…the organizer must be able to split himself into two parts — one part in the arena of action where he polarizes the issue to 100 to nothing, and helps to lead his forces into conflict, while the other part knows that when the time comes for negotiations that it really is only a 10 percent difference.” p.78

“…the organizer is constantly creating new out of the old. He knows that all new ideas arise from conflict; [See Dialectic Process] that every time man as had a new idea it has been a challenge to the sacred ideas of the past and the present and inevitably a conflict has raged.” p.79

5. Communication [Notice the emphasis on conflict, dialogue, relationships, etc. Team “service” is essential to building strong relationships through “common involvements”]

“And so the guided questioning goes on without anyone losing face or being left out of the decision-making. Every weakness of every proposed tactic is probed by questions…. Is this manipulation? Certainly….” p.88

“One of the factors that changes what you can and can’t communicate is relationships. There are sensitive areas that one does not touch until there is a strong personal relationship based on common involvements. Otherwise the other party turns off and literally does not hear….

“Conversely, if you have a good relationship, he is very receptive…. For example, I have always believed that birth control and abortion are personal rights to be exercised by the individual. If, in my early days when I organized… neighborhood in Chicago, which was 95 per cent Roman Catholic, I had tried to communicate this, even through the experience of the residents, whose economic plight was aggravated by large families, that would have been the end of my relationship with the community. That instant I would have been stamped as an enemy of the church and all communication would have ceased.

“Some years later, after establishing solid relationships, I was free to talk about anything…. By then the argument was no longer limited to such questions as, ‘How much longer do you think the Catholic Church can hang on to this archaic notion and still survive?’ …the subject and nature of the discussion would have been unthinkable without that solid relationship.” pp.93-94

6. In the Beginning: The Process of Power [Notice the compromise needed to build the power base. Yet, since pragmatism has eroded all values, it’s simply a matter of ends justifying means. It’s not unlike churches that attract members through the world’s entertainment — then continue to soften or hide Truth in order to keep them happy and lure more.]

“From the moment the organizer enters a community he lives, dreams… only one thing and that is to build the mass power base of what he calls the army. Until he has developed that mass power base, he confronts no major issues…. Until he has those means and power instruments, his ‘tactics’ are very different from power tactics. Therefore, every move revolves around one central point: how many recruits will this bring into the organization, whether by means of local organizations, churches, service groups, labor Unions, corner gangs, or as individuals.”

“Change comes from power, and power comes from organization.” p.113

“The first step in community organization is community disorganization. The disruption of the present organization is the first step toward community organization. Present arrangements must be disorganized if they are to be displace by new patterns…. All change means disorganization of the old and organization of the new.” p.116

The indisputable evidence of what I am suggesting here can clearly be seen in who the organizers of CPAC have invited, and who they have barred from speaking at the 2017 CPAC.

Its wasn’t the political pundits or media talking heads that got Donald Trump elected. It wasn’t the elitists members of the GOP. It was the actual real Conservative base of the Republican Party that carried Trump over the finish line. The majority of the media talking heads, so called conservative punditry and the GOP Elitist Leadership all viciously opposed Donald Trump. In so doing, they exposed themselves for who and what they really are, Infiltrating Member’s of the corrupt Marxist Globalist plutocracy.

If you do not know the history or strategic tactics of the Marxist cabal of infiltrators then their actions bear more than a passing resemblance to angry tantrums being thrown by spoiled children who did not get their way during the last election. This is exactly what you are suppose to think, so that you will dismiss their actions as those of enemy combatants and mistake them for angry petulant fits by people on your side of a politically rough and tumble discourse.

In short, the upper echelons of the CPAC Organization have been infiltrated by radical Marxist activists who are using their positions within CPAC to “get information or to influence the way the group thinks or behaves“. These people are not just moderate Republicans or RINO’s, they are Marxist Infiltrators, and tragically, a fairly large number of them do not even realize that that is what they are. They were indoctrinated into Marxism in school without their even being aware of it and have become the ultimate in covert sleeper agents.