Chuck Schumer’s 18 US Code Chapter 115, Section’s 2384 and 2385 Coup d’etat comes more into focus


Back in January of 2017 Senator Chuck Schumer and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s former counter terrorism advisor Daniel Benjamin threatened incoming President of the United States of America Donald J Trump.

Chuck Schumer said ” Intelligence Agencies ‘Have Six Ways From Sunday Of Getting Back At You’. Yes, that is a direct threat aimed at President Trump by a sitting Senator.

Daniel Benjamin had this to say “Leakers and whistleblowers won’t hesitate. What [former Deputy CIA Director] Morell and other intelligence veterans are too decorous to mention is that Trump’s treatment of his spies will also come back to bite him in the form of leaking and whistleblowing. The intelligence community doesn’t leak as much as the Pentagon or Congress, but when its reputation is at stake, it can do so to devastating effect.”

Again, while somewhat subtler than Schumer’s threat, this is likewise a direct threat against the President of the United states of America.

Until either July or August of 2019 the legal requirement for a lawful whistle blower complaint was that the whistle blower had to have first hand knowledge of the event or actions that they were filing their complaint on. This requirement was secretly changed and it is now obvious that it was done specifically to allow a hearsay complaint to be lodged by a member of one of America’s Intelligence Agencies to file a “Urgent Concern” complaint against President Trump.

There is one insurmountable problem with this whistler blower complaint.

Treaty with Ukraine on Mutual Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters

THE WHITE HOUSE, November 10, 1999.
To the Senate of the United States:
With a view to receiving the advice and consent of the Senate to
ratification, I transmit herewith the Treaty Between the United
States of America and Ukraine on Mutual Legal Assistance in
Criminal Matters with Annex, signed at Kiev on July 22, 1998. I
transmit also, for the information of the Senate, an exchange of
notes which was signed on September 30, 1999, which provides for
its provisional application, as well as the report of the Department
of State with respect to the Treaty.
The Treaty is one of a series of modern mutual legal assistance
treaties being negotiated by the United States in order to counter
criminal activities more effectively. The Treaty should be an effective
tool to assist in the prosecution of a wide variety of crimes, including
drug trafficking offenses. The Treaty is self-executing. It
provides for a broad range of cooperation in criminal matters. Mutual
assistance available under the Treaty includes: taking of testimony
or statements of persons; providing documents, records, and
articles of evidence; serving documents; locating or identifying persons;
transferring persons in custody for testimony or other purposes;
executing requests for searches and seizures; assisting in
proceedings related to restraint, confiscation, forfeiture of assets,
restitution, and collection of fines; and any other form of assistance
not prohibited by the laws of the requested state.
I recommend that the Senate give early and favorable consideration
to the Treaty and give its advice and consent to ratification.
WILLIAM J. CLINTON.

The United States of America under President Bill Clinton signed a treaty with Ukraine on Mutual Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters with Annex, signed at Kiev on July 22, 1998, and with an Exchange of Notes signed on September 30, 1999, which provides for its provisional application.

Meaning, President Trump’s request of the Ukrainian President was 100 percent legal.

Chuck Schumer’s threat combined with Adam Schiff’s actions clearly constitute a violation of 18 US Code Chapter 115, Sections 2384 and 2385.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2384

18 U.S. Code § 2384. Seditious conspiracy

U.S. Code
Notes

prev | next

If two or more persons in any State or Territory, or in any place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, conspire to overthrow, put down, or to destroy by force the Government of the United States, or to levy war against them, or to oppose by force the authority thereof, or by force to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of the United States, or by force to seize, take, or possess any property of the United States contrary to the authority thereof, they shall each be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2385

18 U.S. Code § 2385. Advocating overthrow of Government

U.S. Code
Notes

prev | next

Whoever knowingly or willfully advocates, abets, advises, or teaches the duty, necessity, desirability, or propriety of overthrowing or destroying the government of the United States or the government of any State, Territory, District or Possession thereof, or the government of any political subdivision therein, by force or violence, or by the assassination of any officer of any such government; or

Whoever, with intent to cause the overthrow or destruction of any such government, prints, publishes, edits, issues, circulates, sells, distributes, or publicly displays any written or printed matter advocating, advising, or teaching the duty, necessity, desirability, or propriety of overthrowing or destroying any government in the United States by force or violence, or attempts to do so; or

Whoever organizes or helps or attempts to organize any society, group, or assembly of persons who teach, advocate, or encourage the overthrow or destruction of any such government by force or violence; or becomes or is a member of, or affiliates with, any such society, group, or assembly of persons, knowing the purposes thereof—

Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both, and shall be ineligible for employment by the United States or any department or agency thereof, for the five years next following his conviction.

If two or more persons conspire to commit any offense named in this section, each shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both, and shall be ineligible for employment by the United States or any department or agency thereof, for the five years next following his conviction.

As used in this section, the terms “organizes” and “organize”, with respect to any society, group, or assembly of persons, include the recruiting of new members, the forming of new units, and the regrouping or expansion of existing clubs, classes, and other units of such society, group, or assembly of persons.

When Adam Schiff had the legal requirement for whistleblowing changed to include hearsay, he violated the RICO Act.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1961

18 U.S. Code § 1961. Definitions

U.S. Code
Notes

prev | next
As used in this chapter—
(1) “racketeering activity” means (A) any act or threat involving murder, kidnapping, gambling, arson, robbery, bribery, extortion, dealing in obscene matter, or dealing in a controlled substance or listed chemical (as defined in section 102 of the Controlled Substances Act), which is chargeable under State law and punishable by imprisonment for more than one year; (B) any act which is indictable under any of the following provisions of title 18, United States Code: Section 201 (relating to bribery), section 224 (relating to sports bribery), sections 471, 472, and 473 (relating to counterfeiting), section 659 (relating to theft from interstate shipment) if the act indictable under section 659 is felonious, section 664 (relating to embezzlement from pension and welfare funds), sections 891–894 (relating to extortionate credit transactions), section 1028 (relating to fraud and related activity in connection with identification documents), section 1029 (relating to fraud and related activity in connection with access devices), section 1084 (relating to the transmission of gambling information), section 1341 (relating to mail fraud), section 1343 (relating to wire fraud), section 1344 (relating to financial institution fraud), section 1351 (relating to fraud in foreign labor contracting), section 1425 (relating to the procurement of citizenship or nationalization unlawfully), section 1426 (relating to the reproduction of naturalization or citizenship papers), section 1427 (relating to the sale of naturalization or citizenship papers), sections 1461–1465 (relating to obscene matter), section 1503 (relating to obstruction of justice), section 1510 (relating to obstruction of criminal investigations), section 1511 (relating to the obstruction of State or local law enforcement), section 1512 (relating to tampering with a witness, victim, or an informant), section 1513 (relating to retaliating against a witness, victim, or an informant), section 1542 (relating to false statement in application and use of passport), section 1543 (relating to forgery or false use of passport), section 1544 (relating to misuse of passport), section 1546 (relating to fraud and misuse of visas, permits, and other documents), sections 1581–1592 (relating to peonage, slavery, and trafficking in persons).,[1] sections 1831 and 1832 (relating to economic espionage and theft of trade secrets), section 1951 (relating to interference with commerce, robbery, or extortion), section 1952 (relating to racketeering), section 1953 (relating to interstate transportation of wagering paraphernalia), section 1954 (relating to unlawful welfare fund payments), section 1955 (relating to the prohibition of illegal gambling businesses), section 1956 (relating to the laundering of monetary instruments), section 1957 (relating to engaging in monetary transactions in property derived from specified unlawful activity), section 1958 (relating to use of interstate commerce facilities in the commission of murder-for-hire), section 1960 (relating to illegal money transmitters), sections 2251, 2251A, 2252, and 2260 (relating to sexual exploitation of children), sections 2312 and 2313 (relating to interstate transportation of stolen motor vehicles), sections 2314 and 2315 (relating to interstate transportation of stolen property), section 2318 (relating to trafficking in counterfeit labels for phonorecords, computer programs or computer program documentation or packaging and copies of motion pictures or other audiovisual works), section 2319 (relating to criminal infringement of a copyright), section 2319A (relating to unauthorized fixation of and trafficking in sound recordings and music videos of live musical performances), section 2320 (relating to trafficking in goods or services bearing counterfeit marks), section 2321 (relating to trafficking in certain motor vehicles or motor vehicle parts), sections 2341–2346 (relating to trafficking in contraband cigarettes), sections 2421–24 (relating to white slave traffic), sections 175–178 (relating to biological weapons), sections 229–229F (relating to chemical weapons), section 831 (relating to nuclear materials), (C) any act which is indictable under title 29, United States Code, section 186 (dealing with restrictions on payments and loans to labor organizations) or section 501(c) (relating to embezzlement from union funds), (D) any offense involving fraud connected with a case under title 11 (except a case under section 157 of this title), fraud in the sale of securities, or the felonious manufacture, importation, receiving, concealment, buying, selling, or otherwise dealing in a controlled substance or listed chemical (as defined in section 102 of the Controlled Substances Act), punishable under any law of the United States, (E) any act which is indictable under the Currency and Foreign Transactions Reporting Act, (F) any act which is indictable under the Immigration and Nationality Act, section 274 (relating to bringing in and harboring certain aliens), section 277 (relating to aiding or assisting certain aliens to enter the United States), or section 278 (relating to importation of alien for immoral purpose) if the act indictable under such section of such Act was committed for the purpose of financial gain, or (G) any act that is indictable under any provision listed in section 2332b(g)(5)(B);
(2) “State” means any State of the United States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, any territory or possession of the United States, any political subdivision, or any department, agency, or instrumentality thereof;
(3) “person” includes any individual or entity capable of holding a legal or beneficial interest in property;
(4) “enterprise” includes any individual, partnership, corporation, association, or other legal entity, and any union or group of individuals associated in fact although not a legal entity;
(5) “pattern of racketeering activity” requires at least two acts of racketeering activity, one of which occurred after the effective date of this chapter and the last of which occurred within ten years (excluding any period of imprisonment) after the commission of a prior act of racketeering activity;
(6) “unlawful debt” means a debt (A) incurred or contracted in gambling activity which was in violation of the law of the United States, a State or political subdivision thereof, or which is unenforceable under State or Federal law in whole or in part as to principal or interest because of the laws relating to usury, and (B) which was incurred in connection with the business of gambling in violation of the law of the United States, a State or political subdivision thereof, or the business of lending money or a thing of value at a rate usurious under State or Federal law, where the usurious rate is at least twice the enforceable rate;
(7) “racketeering investigator” means any attorney or investigator so designated by the Attorney General and charged with the duty of enforcing or carrying into effect this chapter;
(8) “racketeering investigation” means any inquiry conducted by any racketeering investigator for the purpose of ascertaining whether any person has been involved in any violation of this chapter or of any final order, judgment, or decree of any court of the United States, duly entered in any case or proceeding arising under this chapter;
(9) “documentary material” includes any book, paper, document, record, recording, or other material; and
(10) “Attorney General” includes the Attorney General of the United States, the Deputy Attorney General of the United States, the Associate Attorney General of the United States, any Assistant Attorney General of the United States, or any employee of the Department of Justice or any employee of any department or agency of the United States so designated by the Attorney General to carry out the powers conferred on the Attorney General by this chapter. Any department or agency so designated may use in investigations authorized by this chapter either the investigative provisions of this chapter or the investigative power of such department or agency otherwise conferred by law.

In violating the RICO Act Adam Schiff made the entire Democrat Party subject to prosecution not merely for violations of the RICO Act, but for violations of 18 US Code Chapter 115, sections 2384 and 2385 as well.

(3) “person” includes any individual or entity capable of holding a legal or beneficial interest in property;
(4) “enterprise” includes any individual, partnership, corporation, association, or other legal entity, and any union or group of individuals associated in fact although not a legal entity;

The Democrat Party is now a de-facto Organized Criminal Syndicate subject to criminal prosecution.

The tragedy here is that the criminal syndicate known as the Democrat Party is unlikely to ever be prosecuted for their violations of 18 US Code Chapter 115, Sections 2384 and 2385 or any of the statutes of the RICO Act because the Department of Justice is utterly and completely corrupt from top to bottom.

Advertisements

Seven days in May…


On February 12th, 1964 the movie “Seven Days in May” was released, based on a novel by the same name written by Fletcher Knebel and Charles W. Bailey II in September 1962. The movie outlines a Coup d’état attempt by member’s of the US Military and certain members of congress.

In 1962 and 1964 the notion of a Coup d’etat against a lawfully elected sitting President of the United States of America was considered absurd enough to be a great thriller.

In 2017 Senator Chuck Schumer threatened lawfully elected President of the United States of America Donald J Trump with a Coup d’etat.

“You take on the intelligence community? They have six ways from Sunday of getting back at you” – Chuck Schumer

Senator Schumer’s actions both then and now constitute a genuine violation of 18 US Code Chapter 115 Sections 2384 and 2385.

California Congressman Adam Schiff is currently demanding an investigation into a supposed whistle blower leak regarding a “Urgent” national security concern. Where a member of the Intelligence Community obtained second hand information regarding actions of the President in talks with foreign leaders.

Congressman Schiff has tied himself to the Coup d’etat attempt and opened the door to the entire Democrat party being subject to the RICO Statutes. Apparently, not one single member of the Democrat party has bothered to read the RICO Act Statutes.

Since Schiff’s and his anonymous whistle blower actions are indisputably the exact actions that Schumer threatened the President with the only possible explanation for why Schiff, Schumer and the entire Democrat party senior leadership are not sitting in federal prison awaiting trial on 18 US Code Chapter 115 Sections 2384 and 2385 and RICO Act violation charges, is that the Deep State infiltration and corruption by democrat agents has corrupted the United States Department of Justice beyond any possibility of redemption.

While it is incredibly tempting to describe the actions of the Democrat party as Treason those actions fail the legal constitutional definition of Treason.

Article three, section three.

Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.

Sitting Congress members by law enjoy certain legal protections against being arrested or prosecuted while performing their elected duties. Those protections however do not shield members of Congress from the RICO Act statutes.

The Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, commonly referred to as the RICO Act or simply RICO, is a United States federal law that provides for extended criminal penalties and a civil cause of action for acts performed as part of an ongoing criminal organization.

When Senator Schumer issued his threat and now that Schiff has indisputably acted on that threat, Schumer and Schiff have opened the door for the entire Democrat party to be charged under the RICO act. Since their actions can only be described as willful, knowledgeable and with a forethought of malice direct violations of 18 US Code Chapter 115 Sections 2384 and 2385, and being that they are both ranking member’s of Congress and senior Democrat party members it follows that there can be zero question of their actions being conspiratorial in nature, thus nullifying their Constitutional protections against arrest and prosecution, hence the RICO Act charges.

Moreover, that any individual in the employ of the United States Department of Justice, let alone the United States Attorney General himself has not already come to this indisputable conclusion and acted on it merely makes manifest the extent of corruption that has perverted the Department of Justice.

I would say Shame on Attorney General William Barr, except that it has become painfully obvious that there is not one single solitary individual within the Department of Justice that has not utterly and entirely been corrupted. I again would say Shame on the Department of Justice, but once again, the corruption that has infested the Department of Justice is so institutional entrenched and systemic in nature, that there obviously is not one single individual within the Department of Justice even remotely capable of comprehending the very nature of being ashamed of their own corrupt and criminal behavior, let alone taking action against that corruption.

The United States Department of Justice has become the adulteress of Proverbs 30:20.

20This is the way of an adulteress: She eats and wipes her mouth and says, “I have done no wrong.”

The Democrat party have become nothing less than a criminal organization the likes of which even the infamous Mafia could only have dreamed of aspiring to. The Department of Justice have made themselves the Democrat parties very own Murder Inc, carrying out the Democrat parties assassinations, intimidation’s and extortion’s. The FBI, yea, just the physical enforcers of Murder Inc.

Smoking Hot Nerd of the Month: Linus Tech Tips


Linus Sebastian of Linux Tech Tips is this months Smoking Hot Nerd of the month. If you have ever watched Linus Tech Tips, then you know that Linus is, well, a bit goofy. He is the proverbial kid locked in the candy store.

Once you get used to his sponsor ads, something that he does in every episode to pay the bills, watching him becomes both informative and entertaining. His forte is gaming rig computers, but is no slouch in presenting other tech related stuff as well.

Jeffery Epstein commits a tragic case of Arkancide.


The billionaire pedophile who hosted a massive private party for former President Bill Clinton on his infamous Pedo Island has committed Arkancide. Tragically mere hours after thousands of court documents naming names of visitors to his exclusive pedo island were released.

For those unfamiliar with the term “Arkancide” it is a term with refers to the apparent suicide of any individual whose court testimony against former president Bill Clinton of his wife Hillary might result in a lengthy prison sentence for the Clinton’s.

While physic’s asserts that nothing can travel faster than the speed of light in a vacuum there apparently is something that can travel faster. That something is how fast the Mainstream corrupt Marxist fake news can decry any possible Clinton connection to Jeffry Epstein’s death.

An old Hillary Clinton conspiracy theory finds new life in Jeffrey Epstein news

July 25, 2019, 1:20 PM PDT
By Brandy Zadrozny

The news that disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein was injured in his Manhattan jail cell has revived a decades-old conspiracy theory that baselessly links Hillary Clinton to a number of “suspicious” deaths.

Epstein, who is facing a possible 45 years if convicted on sex-trafficking and conspiracy charges, was reportedly found Wednesday semiconscious in his New York City jail cell with marks around his neck. Sources close to the investigation told NBC News that the injuries may have come from another inmate or been self-inflicted, and Epstein is now on suicide watch.

The news was sensational grist for conspiracy theorists and far-right pundits, who leapt to Twitter to suggest that Esptein’s injuries might somehow be linked to former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. The theory, known as the “Clinton Body Count,” was soon trending on Twitter, with the corresponding #ClintonBodyCount hashtag attached to more than 70,000 tweets by Thursday afternoon.

The testimony of Jeffery Epstein would most certainly have resulted in criminal charges being filed against Bill and possibly Hillary Clinton. After Epstein’s ‘Apparent” suicide attempt on July 25th 2019, Epstein was placed on 24 hour suicide watch.

In the case of Jeffery Epstein, suicide watch obviously meant, that there would be multiple individuals watching to ensure that Jeffery managed to successfully commit suicide.

The successful Arkancide of Jeffery Epstein will no doubt go down in history as President Donald J Trump’s single worst mistake. The reason being that Jeffery’s Arkancide was the single most predictable event in recorded human history. There was a greater possibility that the sun would not rise on Saturday August 10th, than there was of Jeffery Epstein living to testify in court.

Interesting in retrospect, the FBI recently decided that one of the greatest threats facing the United States of America, is the unrestricted spread of “Conspiracy Theories”. Theories about, FBI corruption, the failed 18 US Code 2384 and 2385 coup against President Trump, the Deep State corruption, and now no doubt, the Arkanciding of Jeffery Epstein.

Let this sink in.

If Seth Rich can be Arkancided for leaking DNC information, if Jeffery Epstein can be Arkancided to prevent his testimony. Who are you, the average anonymous, to think you cannot be Arkancided just as easily should you make the mistake of representing a genuine threat to the Deep State?

The Mainstream Media are protecting the Deep State (see NBC article above) while the Deep State are protecting Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, Loretta Lynch, Sally Yates, James Comey, John Brennan, James Clapper, Rod Rosenstein ect ect ect.

Who the hell is protecting you, the average American Citizen? Because it sure as fuck isn’t the FBI or the Department of Justice.

Mexico demands safe return of all Mexican citizens


In the wake of the El Paso Walmart shooting deaths of three Mexican citizens, Mexico has demanded that the United States Government take all steps necessary to immediately effect the safe return to Mexico of all Mexican citizens currently in the United States of America.

Citing not only the tragic deaths at the El Paso Walmart, Mexican Authorities have declared that the White Nationalist hateful rhetoric constantly spewed by United States President Donald J Trump has fostered a climate of anti white sentiment within the United States that makes it an unacceptable risk to the life’s and welfare of Mexican citizens.

Mexico therefore has come to the inescapable conclusion that the only acceptable solution to this life threatening situation, is for the United states Government to effect the most expedient and safe return to Mexico of any and all Mexican Citizen currently residing within the United States of America.

Mexican Authorities had stated that should the Trump Administration not take immediate action Mexico will be forced to file legal charges of negligence and culpability against the Trump Administration in the World Court in the Hague.

Surprise, you just been royally FUCKED.


The Deep State, i.e. James Comey, Rod Rosenstein, James Clapper, John Brennan, Loretta Lynch, Dan Coats, Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama are in serious Deep Shit. Recent revelations show that Rosenstein conspired with Mueller from pretty much the second that President Trump fired James Comey to entrap President Trump in a obstruction of Justice charge.

The Obama Administration under the direct orders of POTUS Barack Obama was engaging in illegal surveillance of Republican Presidential Candidate Donald J Trump. They engaged in a campaign of lies and disinformation in an attempt to prevent him from being elected and to throw the election to Hillary Clinton.

The FBI knowingly, willfully and with a full forethought of malice aided and abetted Hillary Clinton in avoiding prosecution for the willful and intentional mishandling of classified information.

The FBI, the CIA, the NSA and various members of the Obama administration were aided and abetted in an illegal 18 US Code section’s 2384 and 2385 attempt to overthrow the lawfully and legitimately elected President of the United States of America.

The extent to which these various senior administration employees violated dozens if not hundreds of federal laws is now becoming public knowledge to anyone with half a brain paying attention.

Add to all the Deep States troubles Jeffery Epstein’s little black book naming names and all hell is about to break lose against the Deep State.

Suddenly…. Almost like clockwork there are 2 mass shootings in America. The first on July 28th at the Gilroy Garlic Festival in Gliroy California, and then today at the Walmart in El Paso Texas.

Seriously folks. If you are too stupid to see this for what it is, then you deserve to be fucked.

UPDATE: There was another mass shooting in Dayton Ohio last night, 9 dead. How many more mass shooting in America will be required to make the Deep States Deep Shit problems fade from public conscientiousness?

A very public Crucifixion.


Special prosecutor Robert Mueller is without a doubt a nearly perfect analog for the type of people Christian apologist C.S. Lewis warned humanity about.

“Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron’s cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience. They may be more likely to go to Heaven yet at the same time likelier to make a Hell of earth. This very kindness stings with intolerable insult. To be “cured” against one’s will and cured of states which we may not regard as disease is to be put on a level of those who have not yet reached the age of reason or those who never will; to be classed with infants, imbeciles, and domestic animals.”

Mueller has been playing fast and loose with the law for decades. The disgraceful and corrupt manner in which Mr Mueller has conducted himself can be traced publicly at least as far back as the late 1980’s.

Former FBI Director Robert Mueller’s History of Cover-Ups

What some people don’t know about Mueller is that he has a long history of leading government investigations that were diversions or cover-ups. These include the investigation into the 1988 bombing of Pan Am Flight 103, the investigation into the terrorist financing Bank of Credit and Commerce International (BCCI), and the FBI investigations into the crimes of September 11th, 2001. Today the public is beginning to realize that Mueller’s investigation into Russian alleged collusion with the Trump campaign is a similar diversion.

Mueller’s talents were noticed early in his career at the Justice Department. As a U.S. Attorney in Boston during the mid-80s, he helped falsely convict four men for murders they didn’t commit in order to protect a powerful FBI informant—mobster James “Whitey” Bulger.” According to the Boston Globe,

“Mueller was also in that position while Whitey Bulger was helping the FBI cart off his criminal competitors even as he buried bodies in shallow graves along the Neponset.”

Mueller didn’t strike plea deal with Jeffrey Epstein

CLAIM: The FBI, under Robert Mueller, let billionaire financier Jeffrey Epstein off with a weak plea deal after dozens of young girls accused him of sexual assault.

AP’S ASSESSMENT: False. Former Miami U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta _ not the FBI or Mueller _ signed a 2008 non-prosecution deal with Epstein, while he was under investigation for sexually abusing at least 40 girls in Florida and New York.

What the AP assessment here very intentionally fails to point out, is that Former Miami U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta struck that plea deal, according to actual court documents, predicated upon Jeffrey Epstein providing information to… Yup, you guessed it, the FBI. Which was under the leadership of then director Robert Mueller.

If this seems reminiscent of the deal that Robert Mueller struck with the infamous serial murdering Boston Mob boss Whitey Bulger, it should. Mueller protected Whitey Bulger for decades as Bulger murdered his organized crime competition. Why did Mueller and company protect Bulger? Because like Jeffrey Epstein, Whitey Bulger had struck a deal to act as an informant to Robert Mueller’s FBI.

Looking back on Mueller’s career and stunningly long string of abuses of the judicial system one might be tempted to judge Mueller as being a utterly amoral corrupt cop. But to do so would be to profoundly misjudge Robert Mueller.

No, the more accurate description of Robert Mueller would be that presented by CS Lewis in his statement on tyrants and tyrannies. Robert Mueller and the entire Deep State fall without question under that definition. They are not corrupt in the classical sense of the definition. They are something far worse.

Robert Mueller and his Deep State cohorts James Clapper, John Brennan, James Comey, Rod Rosenstien ect. Were not corrupted by money or power. They were not in any sense of the word criminals acting out of self intere3sts.

What they are, are individuals on a crusade. Individuals for whom what they did became inseparable from whom they were. Their dedication to their mission lead them to place themselves and their methods to achieve that mission above the very law they were sworn to uphold.

As CS Lewis put it, “but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience”.

During Mueller’s testimony before congress Rep. John Ratcliffe (R-TX) both intentionally and inadvertently made this indisputably clear. Ratcliffe’s intention was to show that Mueller had run his investigation into whether Trump colluded with the Russian’s and or attempted to obstruct justice regarding that investigation in a manner that violated every policy and judicial guideline within the United States Judicial System.

Rep. Ratcliffe to Mueller: You Didn’t Follow Special Counsel Rules, You Wrote About Decisions That Weren’t Reached

REP. JOHN RATCLIFFE (R-TX): Time is short. I’ve got five minutes. Let’s just leave it at you can’t find it because I’ll tell you why. It doesn’t exist. The special counsel’s job, nowhere does it say that you were to conclusively determine Donald Trump’s innocence or that the special counsel report should determine whether or not to exonerate him. It’s not in any of the documents. It’s not in your appointment order. It’s not in the special counsel regulations. It’s not in the OLC opinions. It’s not in the justice manual, and it’s not in the Principles of Federal Prosecution.

Nowhere do those words appear together because respectfully, respectfully, director, it was not the special counsel’s job to conclusively Donald Trump’s innocence or to exonerate him because the bedrock principle of our justice system is a presumption of innocence. It exists for everyone. Everyone is entitled to it, including sitting presidents. And because there is a presumption of innocence, prosecutors never, ever need to conclusively determine it.

Now, director, the special counsel applied this inverted burden of proof that I can’t find and you said doesn’t exist anywhere in the department policies, and you used it to write a report. And the very first line of your report, the very first line of your report says that–as you read this morning, it authorizes the special counsel to provide the attorney general with a confidential report explaining the prosecution or declination decisions reached by the special counsel. That’s the very first word of your report, right?

ROBERT MUELLER, FMR. SPECIAL COUNSEL: That’s correct.

These unelected senior administration level bureaucrats collectively known as “The Deep State” have wrapped themselves in the American flag and hoisted upon themselves the mantle of self righteous protectors of American Democracy. They have set themselves above the law, because, in their opinions and beliefs, they are the law.

It is utterly incontrovertible that these individuals, believing that what they were engaging in, was what was best for the United States of America, did willfully and with a full forethought of malice engage in an illegal 18 US Code 2384 and 2385 attempted Coup d’état against the lawfully and legitimately elected 45 president of the United States of America.

Yes, Robert Mueller and his team violated the most sacred principal of American Jurisprudence in an attempt to delegitimize and remove a sitting president because they did not like him.

The greatest tragedy in this 2 year long fiasco is not that President Donald Trump was the victim of a witch hunt. The greatest tragedy is that the vast majority of the unelected senior administration level deep state bureaucrats, the various elected officials who gave them aid and comfort and the mainstream media who acted as their elite storm troopers in foisting this act of mendacious malfeasance upon the America people will go unprosecuted for what can only truly be described as the greatest act of treachery perpetrated against the Republic of the United States of America in America’s history.