Of Pyrrhic Victories (or why you shouldn’t think with your genitals)


In California, America’s homosexual community has shown beyond any reasonable doubt that they are nothing more than jack booted Nazi’s acting in the most narcissistic self indulgent fashion imaginable. Their capacity for cognizant rational thought obviously is incapable of reaching beyond the end of their own genitals. Displaying a “The end justifies the means” lust for satisfying their own desires, they have engaged in a scorched earth policy against the citizens of both California and the entire rest of the United States of America.

Rather than recognizing federal judge Vaughn Walker’s ruling as the clear and indisputable usurpation of California’s State Constitution (Walker should have recused himself from hearing the case due to his being a individual who would personally benefit from his ruling), they heralded it as a triumph for Homosexual rights. The simple and indisputable truth is that it could not be further from being the emancipation they dream of. Rather instead, it set the legal precedent wherein the citizens, aka the people of the State of California, as well as those of all 49 other states have now become subject to the tyranny of the minority.

The real world effect of Judge Walker’s ruling is to strip the people of each state of the right to amend their state constitutions to reflect the will of the majority of the states legal residents. In other-words, to make their states constitutions null and void, thus placing the citizens of those states under the rule as subject, rather than citizens, of whomever the current state administration happens to be. This is nothing short of tyranny of the minority, and should be considered both an abomination and intolerable to every Citizen of the United States of America.

Showing themselves to be moral cowards, Justice Roberts SCOTUS decided that those attempting to oppose Judge Walker’s usurpation of California’s State Constitution did not have legal standing, thus placing yet another layer of cement upon the tyranny of the minority Judge Walker set in place. Their decision effectively means that any time a state passes an amendment to their constitution that amendment only stands if the states governor and or attorney general defend that amendment in court. Any time that any group decides to challenge a majority approved amendment that amendment becomes subject to repeal if the current governor and states attorney general do not agree with that amendment.

The homosexual community do not give a damned what the long term consequences of their Pyrrhic victory are, because they are constitutionally incapable of thinking beyond their own personal self gratification. Thinking with their self aggrandizing narcissistic genitals they have not bothered to consider the future ramifications of their actions. They have made the seriously flawed assumption that America’s current liberal leftest political climate is permanent and that the propaganda that has placed an apparent acceptance of their lifestyle is equally permanent.

Should the nightmare haunting the waking hours of America’s conservative and Libertarians come to pass, (that of a complete economic collapse) occur, it would be difficult if not outright impossible to envision that liberal leftest political climate surviving, not to mention what the push-back against those who instigated that climate would be. Needless to say, if history is our guide, that push-back would be neither pretty nor desirable to those supporting that liberal leftest agenda.

Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron’s cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
C. S. Lewis

In robbing the people of their right to self determination both the SCOTUS and the homosexual community have placed the citizens of California and the United States of America under the very tyranny that CS Lewis spoke of. The tyranny of the liberal leftest minority moral busybodies who suffer under the delusion that the forceful infliction of their morals and ethics or more accurately, the complete and total lack thereof, constitute what is best for the America people.

Pyrrhic victory

A Pyrrhic victory is a victory with such a devastating cost that it carries the implication that another such victory will ultimately lead to defeat. Someone who wins a Pyrrhic victory has been victorious in some way; however, the heavy toll negates any sense of achievement or profit. A “Pyrrhic victory” can also mean a false or temporary victory where a win entails a loss subsequently or in the bigger picture.
Etymology

The phrase Pyrrhic victory is named after Greek King Pyrrhus of Epirus, whose army suffered irreplaceable casualties in defeating the Romans at Heraclea in 280 BC and Asculum in 279 BC during the Pyrrhic War. After the latter battle, Plutarch relates in a report by Dionysius:

The armies separated; and, it is said, Pyrrhus replied to one that gave him joy of his victory that one more such victory would utterly undo him. For he had lost a great part of the forces he brought with him, and almost all his particular friends and principal commanders; there were no others there to make recruits, and he found the confederates in Italy backward. On the other hand, as from a fountain continually flowing out of the city, the Roman camp was quickly and plentifully filled up with fresh men, not at all abating in courage for the loss they sustained, but even from their very anger gaining new force and resolution to go on with the war.
—Plutarch, [1]

In both of Pyrrhus’s victories, the Romans suffered greater casualties than Pyrrhus did; however, the Romans had a much larger supply of men from which to draw soldiers, so their casualties did less damage to their war effort than Pyrrhus’s casualties did to his.

The report is often quoted as “Another such victory and I come back to Epirus alone”,[2] or “If we are victorious in one more battle with the Romans, we shall be utterly ruined.”[3]

The term is used as an analogy in fields such as business, politics, and sports to describe struggles that end up ruining the victor. Theologian Reinhold Niebuhr, for example, commented on the necessity of coercion in preserving the course of justice by warning, “Moral reason must learn how to make coercion its ally without running the risk of a Pyrrhic victory in which the ally exploits and negates the triumph.”[4] Also, in Beauharnais v. Illinois, a 1952 U.S. Supreme Court decision involving a charge proscribing group libel, Justice Hugo Black alluded to the Pyrrhic War in his dissent: “If minority groups hail this holding as their victory, they might consider the possible relevancy of this ancient remark: ‘Another such victory and I am undone.'”[5]

California’s Homosexual community, aided and abetted by America’s homosexual community, (at 1.2 percent of America’s population a minority by anyone’s standards) has chosen the path of becoming CS Lewis moral tyrants, dictating to the entire rest of society what societies moral and ethical standards should be. Choosing the ideology that “The end justifies the means” in doing so giving no consideration to the future consequences of their actions. They are no more than spoiled children thinking with their genitals and caring only that they get what they want with no regard for anyone else or what the consequences of their desires might be. They have opened a door which shall not easily be closed again, a door through which a far more oppressive tyranny now has free and easy access to pass. The people of the United States of America are no longer a free and sovereign people, but now subjects of CS Lewis moral tyrants.

OUCH…. Now that’s going to leave a mark…..


Now I know that I have a small and insignificant little blog, I’m not offended by that fact, it is after all what it is. When I first began to comment on blogs it was over at a blog, which at the time was one of the most prominent conservative blogs in America, “Little Green Footballs”. Well, that was before Charles Johnson went nuttier than squirrel shit and banned the very people that had made his blog successful.

Well here we are, a good number of years later, and “Little Green Footballs” is, well to be honest, it has gone into the shitter. Charles utterly destroyed his reputation and made a colossal ass out of himself. He honestly has nobody but himself to blame for his current situation, the depths of that situation can be seen pretty damned clearly in this screen shot taken from Technorati. Sucks to be you, eh Charles…

Chuckles

Have you ever wondered?


It is said that “All that is required for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing”. The full weight and significance of that phrase not only seems to balance precariously upon the word “Nothing”, but to be in the very process of being tested, by America’s Marxist elitist ruling class, to the furthermost outer limits of that definition.

When the Obamanation that is Obamacare was foisted upon America, only one who had aligned themselves with evil could make the proclamation that good men had done nothing. For indeed, all across America good men and women confronted their elected representatives in record numbers and demanded that Obamacare be rejected. Only to have those selfsame elected representatives not only completely ignore their demands, but lock them out of the very public meetings that they scheduled to ask the general public what they thought about Obamacare.

Following hotly upon the heels of the passage of Obamacare came the 2010 mid-term elections, which, coincidentally, displayed itself as one of the most costly bloodbaths in American electoral history. Those that had voted for the Obamanation that is Obamacare, whose seats were up for reelection, found themselves in hotly contested struggles, with a record number of them being unable to secure their own reelections.

Sadly, the truth of what had taken place at the polls was, with no small degree of mendacious malfeasance, withheld from broadcast by the Fifth Column Treasonous Media. In short, the Fifth Column Treasonous Media conspired to collude with the Marxist elite party leadership of both the Democrat and Republican parties to prevent the American people from knowing the full extent of the American peoples displeasure.

Webster’s Dictionary, founded by Daniel Webster, one of those dusty old dead white men whom we are now increasingly informed deserve only our derision and mockery, defines the word “Nothing” thusly; “not any thing : no thing . 2. : no part. 3. : one of no interest, value, or consequence . — nothing …”

With 84 seats changing hands, one would need to be both intellectually disingenuous as well as dishonest to make the assertion that, “not any thing : no thing . 2. : no part. 3. : one of no interest, value, or consequence . — nothing …” had taken place.

Yet, here we find ourselves, once again looking squarely into the face of an intractable foe committed to achieving it’s own agenda despite our taking such clear and indisputably harsh and drastic actin against it. Not a single individual possessing the bare minimum of two functional brain cells could reasonably come to the conclusion that the leadership of the Democrat or the Republican Parties were unaware of the exact reasons for the 2010 bloodbath.

Not only could they not come to that conclusion, but given the recent revelations that the IRS and other very powerful federal bureaucracies were instructed to engage in illegal acts of intimidation and harassment of individuals and groups that had taken part in that historic rebuke of what can only be described as an intransigent, hostile and disloyal congressional body, it becomes only to obvious the leadership of both parties are engaged in what can only be named with accuracy and honesty as a coup d’état.

When the Supreme Court of the United States of America ruled on June 26th, that private citizens of the State of California did not have standing to defend the lawfully enacted legislation known as “Proposition 8” if the State government refused to defend it, they basically declared to the Citizens of the United States of America, you are no longer citizens, but now chattel, property of the State, subject to the will of the ruling elite.

Once upon a time not so long ago, in a far distant country, a single man stood in the middle of a public square, grocery bags in his hands, in front of a Tank. He refused for hours to stand aside and grant the great war machine to pass by without first running him over.

It is said that one single man, standing up at the right moment in time and saying no can change the entire course of history. In 2010 millions of American’s stood up and said not just no, but HELL NO. The consequence thus far has been that the federal government has responded by telling those citizens, your opinion is neither required nor desired.

At what point does that special moment take place, where one single action taken by one single individual set’s off a cascading chain of events, where the tipping point is reached, and those who have been standing, waiting, take action?

Wendy Davis destroys Texas; (or at least the myth that Texas is a great place)


National Review’s Onlines Charles Cooke wrote an acceptable, even if in my personal opinion tepid puppy piss weak, article on the fatal blow delivered to Texas by Wendy Davis and her heinous murder loving sycophants.

Stand with . . . Death

Funnily enough, there is nothing in the American social contract that permits the disgruntled to scream their way to political victory. On Tuesday night, however, you could have been forgiven for thinking otherwise. When a speaking filibuster conducted by America’s new pro-choice darling, Wendy Davis, was ended by a procedural technicality, a turbulent mob descended on the chamber of the Texas state senate and set about unleashing chaos. Distressingly, the tactic worked — for 90 minutes, at least. Although the ayes prevailed in a vote held in the dying minutes of the session, the passed bill was signed at two minutes past midnight — after the session had closed for the year. Despite the self-serving attempts of the Republican majority to pretend that this did not matter, it was determined that it did. At 3 a.m., the bill was pronounced dead, and Wendy Davis and those who stood with her had won.

Unlike Charles Cooke, I do not worry myself about offending people who might have delicate sensibilities. I will make myself self as completely unambiguously crystal clear as it is possible for any human being to be. I will pull no punches and if what I say offends your fragile delicate sensibilities, well, that’s just to fucking bad.

Abortion is MURDER, period, end of story. If you support, advocate or are sympathetic to abortion, then you are an evil individual. If you have had an abortion for any reason other than continuing the pregnancy will result in your own death, then you are a goddamned murder. You deserve nothing less than to be arrested, tried, convicted, and then incarcerated for that murder.

There it is… I have said the deep dark fear of every Abortion Advocate and FemNazi.

If you believe in the God of Christianity and Judaism, there can be no other moral or ethical position for you to take.

Jeremiah 1:5
Before I formed thee in the belly I knew thee; and before thou camest forth out of the womb I sanctified thee, and I ordained thee a prophet unto the nations.

Contained within this statement by God to the prophet Jeremiah is a declarative statement of revelation, it refers not just to the prophet Jeremiah, but to every single human being. In this statement God is informing everyone who ever has or ever will exist, that he knows who they are, and that that knowledge preexists their birth.

Thou shall not Kill…. Remember that one? Here is a hint for you just in case you aren’t bright enough to get it on your own, that is a commandment, not a suggestion or request.

Thou shall not Kill

You shall not murder sometimes translated as You shall not kill, KJV Thou shalt not kill (LXX οὐ φονεύσεις, translating Hebrew לֹא תִּרְצָח lo tirṣaḥ), is a moral imperative included as one of the Ten Commandments in the Torah,[1] specifically Exodus 20:13 and Deuteronomy 5:17.

The imperative is against unlawful killing resulting in bloodguilt. The Hebrew Bible contains numerous prohibitions against unlawful killing, but also allows for justified killing in the context of warfare, capital punishment, and self-defense.

So there it is, contrary to the uneducated and mistaken beliefs of most people the commandment is not, “Thou shall not KILL“, but rather, thou shall not commit murder. The legal definition of murder relies upon the legality of the act of depriving another human being of their life. In reality, the definition of murder is much more simple. It constitutes the taking of an innocent persons life.

You do not get any more innocent than a baby in it’s mothers womb. The fact that our legal system has declared it lawful for a mother to murder her own unborn child does not change the fact that abortion is murder. It only proves that our legal system is corrupt and that our moral fabric as a people is profoundly damaged.

Anyone who claims to be a Christian, yet advocates or is sympathetic towards abortion is straight up deceiving themselves and is no more of a Christian than Satan himself is. No servant can serve two masters; for either he will hate the one and love the other, or else he will be loyal to the one and despise the other.

If you wish to lie to yourself, to deceive yourself, that’s your business, not mine. If the consequences of your decision were to be be yours and yours alone to suffer, that would be fine, and I would not care or bother to say anything. With respect to abortion, that simply is not the case. If you, regardless of whether you deceive yourself or not, support, advocate or are sympathetic to abortion, then you are a conspirator to the murder of innocent children.

If you say, “Hey, but I’m an atheist, I don’t believe in God” your argument holds no more validity than if you claim to be a Christian and advocate abortion. To be an atheist is not to be without moral or ethical values. To make the claim that you are an atheist yet have no moral or ethical values is the same as claiming to be a Christian who doesn’t believe in God.

The moral and ethical values of an atheist are indistinguishable from a Christian when it comes to the subject of murder. It still constitutes the taking of an innocent life, and is just as wrong for an atheist as it is for any religious person, perhaps in it’s own way even more so since to the atheist this life is it, it’s all you get, it’s the only thing that any individual really has.

Being an atheist may perhaps for some individuals be little more than an act of angry rebellion against the beliefs of their parents. But for a great many, it is a well thought out conscience decision that was arrived at only after a long and difficult process. It is not an angry fist raised against God, but a resigned intellectual acceptance that that individual on a intensely personal level has never experienced first hand any event or evidence that could legitimately defined as a personal interaction with the divine.

I both have friends who are atheists, and have met a great number of atheists, and I have never personally met a single atheist who did not consider life to be sacred. One per customer, no refunds, no do overs, tends to have that effect on people. Nor, might I add, have I ever met a genuine atheist who did not have extremely high moral and ethical standards. My best friend and his wife are atheists and I consider it an honor to be friends with them. As they have both told me on numerous occasions, “Your life is the single most precious thing that you can or ever will posses”.

When Wendy Davis stood in the Texas State Senate and triumphantly argued her case (with the help of her sycophants) she was not poisoning the well of Texas moral and ethical values, though that will be the consequence of her actions. What she did was to expose the degree that evil has corrupted the once great Republic of Texas, destroying forever the myth of Texas somehow being the last true bastion of moral and ethical greatness in America.

Wendy Davis relegated Texas to merely being just another state in the United States of America corrupted by Liberal ideology and doomed to suffer the same fate as every other state where the terminal viral infection of Marxist liberalism has taken hold. The camels nose is no longer poking under the tent of Texas, the whole damned camel is now in the tent.

I therefore say with the greatest of sadness, to all of my friends in Texas as well as to all of those residing there who are still uninfected and honorable, Welcome to being California, a once great but now suffering and corrupt place to live.

Marco Rubio is turning into Nancy Pelosi.


During the infamous Obamacare debates, Nancy Pelosi bragged to anyone who had the misfortune of being anywhere near where they could hear her voice. From her utterly insane promises that it would provide coverage for everyone while reducing the cost of coverage, to her outrageously insulting proclamations that we would have to pass the bill to see what was in it.

Rubio: This immigration bill does virtually everything anyone’s asked me to do about border security; Update: Backers not sure if bill creates incentive to hire illegals over Americans

Republican Senator Marco Rubio, shifting his tone on the U.S. immigration bill he helped to write, said on Tuesday he is now fully satisfied that the measure will do what it takes to secure the southern border with Mexico…

“This amendment basically now puts into place virtually everything people have been asking me to do about immigration enforcement since I began talking about this issue,” Rubio told a convention of the American Society of News Editors. “I think we’ve run out of things we can to do to support – to improve the border.”…

Asked about House Speaker John Boehner’s strategy for handling the immigration issue in that chamber, Rubio said it is up to House lawmakers to determine the course they want to take.

But he added: “I think we have a good piece of legislation they should take a look at. There are a lot of good ideas that they should adopt.”

As the Washington Examiner’s Philip Klein recently reported: “Under Obamacare, businesses with over 50 workers that employ American citizens without offering them qualifying health insurance could be subject to fines of up to $3,000 per worker. But because newly legalized immigrants wouldn’t be eligible for subsidies on the Obamacare exchanges until after they become citizens – at least 13 years under the Senate bill – businesses could avoid such fines by hiring the new immigrants instead.”

On Tuesday afternoon, THE WEEKLY STANDARD asked five different U.S. Senators about this problem. These five senators, all Democrats, voted to cut off debate Monday night on the revised immigration bill, but none of them knew if the bill would create a financial incentive for some employers to hire amnestied immigrants instead of American citizens.

“We’re trying to solve that right now. I don’t know if that’s been solved,” Senator Max Baucus of Montana (chief author of Obamacare) told THE WEEKLY STANDARD.

They voted to end debate on a bill without knowing for sure if it gives employers a huge incentive to hire illegals over Americans? What?

The similarities between what Marco Rubio and his “Gang of Eight” fools and Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid pulled with Obamacare are disturbing on so many levels that it is genuinely frightening. Marco and his gangster buddies are displaying the stereotypical narcissistic arrogance of that marked the 18th century French Aristocracy and the average Democrat politician.

They don’t give a damned what the American people want, only what they want. One finds ones self wondering how much money Rubio and his gangster buddies are going to make on the sly off this amnesty legislation. Why else would they work so damned hard to push legislation that there can be no possible way they do not know is so unpopular?

Amnesty, once again our elected officials betray the people who elected them.


The Aristocrats in the GOP and Democrat parties are once again betraying the people who trusted them to faithfully represent them. We saw this exact same behavior with the passage of Obamacare, when 80 percent of the country stood up at various town-hall meetings and told their elected representatives, not just no, but hell no.

When average American’s got together in loosely organized groups to bring the pain to their elected representatives because of their Obamacare betrayal, those elected representatives in collusion with the Fifth Column Treasonous Media took a page out of the old Soviet Politburo play book and began a vicious attack on those organizations.

Uh oh: New IRS chief says inappropriate screening of tax-exempt groups was broader, and lasted longer, than thought

Most of the so called “Right” would like to hang the IRS intimidation of the TEA Party groups on the Obamanation Administration. It’s the easy convenient target, the target that requires little to no thought or action. The problem is, that the Obamanation Administration is merely complicit in this scandal. The real culprits are the high ranking Congressional and Senate members who were threatened by the TEA Parties.

These so called elected representatives do not give a damned what their constitutes ask of them. Their sole concerns are personally profiting financially from their positions and protecting their seats of power. These douche bags have exempted themselves from laws that apply to regular tax paying American’s. Ask Martha Stewart what happens when you engage in insider trading while not being an elected representative. When you are a Congressman or Senator, it’s perfectly legal.

File your taxes wrong, go to jail, unless you’re a Congressman like Charlie Rangle or the head of the Treasury like Tim Gietner. Don’t pay your taxes, go to jail, unless you are an employee of the federal government.

Who, exactly, as in tell me the name, from the IRS is being held accountable for intimidating the TEA Party people? By held accountable, no I do not mean, given a promotion. Ask yourself who really profited from that IRS intimidation? Yes, that intimidation definitely helped Obama get reelected, but that, honestly was just tangential. The Republican RINO’s are who really profited.

The high ranking powerful RINO’s and the Democrats who voted for Obamacare are who profited. In 2010 the TEA Parties made a lot of politicians pay for their Obamacare votes. Those high ranking powerful survivors of the 2010 bloodbath made damned certain that there was no repeat of that bloodbath in 2012 and they both were and are attempting to ensure that 2014 likewise is not a repeat of 2010.

They know damned well that once they pass this amnesty bill, that their constitutes are going to be pissed off. So no, nobody in Congress or the Senate are going to do anything about the IRS scandal. Those assholes need the IRS to continue intimidating average American’s so that 2014 does not become a repeat of the 2010 bloodbath.

Make no mistake about it, 2010 was a bloodbath of historic proportions, but not purely as a referendum against the Democrats, it was a repudiation of Obamacare, and those who voted for it. These elitist self anointed Aristocrats in Congress and the Senate will do anything that they can to protect their positions of power.

Rubio favorability drops 15 points among GOP in Rasmussen poll

Given the available facts here, who in their right mind thinks that Senator Rubio is going to push for prosecution in this IRS scandal?

Edit: Need more proof that the IRS scandal is never going to result in anyone being prosecuted? Check out this latest poll on what the GOP and Independent base are saying they are going to do if this Amnesty farce passes.

Poll: Near-majority of Republicans say they’re less likely to vote for incumbents who support path to citizenship

Hanlon’s razor.


Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity.

There are phrases in the every language such as the one above. They speak volumes in just a few short well chosen words. The truths they convey are universal, crossing all language, cultural and ethnic borders. Throughout history every race, every nationality, every culture has had it’s individuals who have made these kinds of observations and been fortunate enough to utter such phrases before anyone else, and thus be attributed with those saying.

From the ancient Chinese military genius Sun Tzu “A leader leads by example not by force” to René Descartes ” I think, therefore I am” and of course my personal favorite from the lessor know American philosopher Edward Van Halen “We’re not like this because we are in a rock and roll band, we’re in a rock and roll band because this is what we are like” and finally Occam’s razor “the simplest explanation is usually the correct one”…

While these short pithy little statements convey universal truths, one must always remember that no universal truth is always 100 percent applicable to every situation. There are exceptions to every rule.

It would be both easy and highly tempting to apply Hanlon’s Razor to both the Fifth Column Treasonous Media and the Professional Blogging Class. The ease with which doing so would exonerate both the Fifth Column Treasonous Media and the Professional Blogging Class from their complete and utter failure to uphold their moral and ethical responsibility to hold those in positions of power accountable for their actions is genuinely frightening.

What happened to America’s once vaunted Fourth Estate ala The Fifth Column Treasonous Media, was as predictable as the sun rising in the east and setting in the west. It was even in a strange twist of fate predicted by the notable American writer Samuel Langhorne Clemens, ala Mark Twain, who once said, “Never pick a fight with a man who buys ink by the barrel”. Combine Clemens statement with the universal truth uttered before the British Parliament in 1770 by John Emerich Edward Dalberg Acton, “Power corrupts; absolute power corrupts absolutely” and the end result was predictably inevitable.

At the end of the American Civil War, the powers that be in America recognized very correctly that the United States was suffering from a profound schism. Brother and fought brother over issues that went far deeper than merely deciding which side would rule the nation or decide it’s future. There were deep and profound moral and ethical issues at stake, whether one man had the moral and ethical right to own another, and just whom exactly had the right to decide their own fate.

In an attempt to heal those wounds, America’s most powerful men made a decision. A decision that profoundly impacted the direction of America. These men decided to import intellectuals and philosophers from Europe’s “Age of Enlightenment” and place them in high positions of trust in America’s institutes of Academia, Politics and Jurisprudence.

This was no conspiracy, there was no “Star Chamber” meeting of the Illuminate where all the most powerful men conspired together to rule the world. These were just powerful and influential men who saw their country battered and bleeding and felt a powerful desire to fix what was obviously broken.

The problem was not that they brought over a bunch of intellectuals and philosophers from Europe, the problem was in which of the intellectuals and philosophers they brought over. In the 1870’s and 80’s the most evangelical of Europe’s “Enlightened” intellectuals and philosophers were those who had a new philosophical and ideological religion. That new philosophical and ideological religion was Marxism.

In 1870-80 Marxism and it’s bastard children Communism and Socialism (and yes Progressivism) had yet to take over a single nation, and thus expose how utterly and completely corrupt and ruthlessly violent the foundational idea’s of Karl Marx and Frederic Engels were. In truth, there is no greater evil on earth than the core ideological concepts upon which Marxism stands. Marxism’s most basic and fundamental principal, it’s most important structural pillar is, “The End Justifies the Means”.

As the decades past, and Marxist regime after Marxist regime proved how utterly evil and corrupt that core ideological and philosophical principal is, those here in America who had been indoctrinated into Marxism reveled in the most disgusting and vile of dissociative acts of denial imaginable. They fell and even to this very day continue to fall back on the mantra, “If only the right people” if only the right people would implement Marxism then this time it will work for certain.

There are no right people, there never will be any right people. Attempts at implementing that evil philosophical ideology have killed more innocent human beings than all the other wars in the last 10,000 years. The body count of innocent lives wiped out of existence in the name of implementing the Marxist Utopia currently stands at somewhere just north of one BILLION people.

The vast majority of America’s once hallowed Fourth Estate and now corrupt Fifth Column Treasonous Media are Vladimir Lenin and Leon Trotsky’s “Fellow Travelers”.

Intellectuals sympathetic to the Bolshevik cause and later to the Soviet Union as a socialist state.

The term fellow traveler (poputchiki) was used by Vladimir Lenin and other Bolsheviks to describe those who agreed with the principles of socialism but did not accept the entire Bolshevik program. Lenin attacked these “petty-bourgeois fellow travelers” for their weak understanding of theory and tactics, and for leading workers away from revolution. Leon Trotsky, in 1918, described the Left Socialist Revolutionaries in similar terms because of their vacillation on the October Revolution.

The pejorative sense of the term gave way in 1924, when Trotsky argued that fellow travelers in literature could be useful for the young Soviet state. He used the term to describe non-party writers who could serve the cause of revolution even though they were not proletarians. In Literature and Revolution, Trotsky argued that non-party intellectuals were no longer a serious threat and could be guided toward a proletarian view of the world. This was followed by a Central Committee resolution in 1925 refusing to prefer one faction or theory of literature over any other.

The groups and individuals defined as fellow travelers during the 1920s constituted a flourishing artistic and literary culture that produced the best Soviet literature of the decade. The most famous group was the Serapion Brotherhood, whose membership included Konstantin Fedin, Yevgeny Zamyatin, and Vsevolod V. Ivanov. These authors believed that literature should be free from outside control, but were generally sympathetic to the goals of the revolution. Others, perhaps less favorably inclined toward the Bolsheviks but nonetheless counted as fellow travelers, were Boris Pilnyak, Isaac Babel, and Mikhail Bulgakov.

By the late 1920s, fellow travelers were coming under increasing pressure from groups claiming to represent the proletariat, such as the Russian Association of Proletarian Writers (RAPP). In 1932, all independent organizations for writers and artists disappeared and the Writers’ Union was created. Fellow travelers were required to either join the union and follow its rules or stop publishing.

By the end of 1920s, the term “fellow traveler” had been taken up in other countries as a designation for people sympathetic to the Soviet Union and especially for intellectuals who publicly expressed support for Stalin. Romain Rolland and George Bernard Shaw, for instance, praised the Soviet Union and saw it as a real alternative to western political systems. In the post – World War II era, “fellow traveler” became a term of derision, applied by conservatives to people who were communists in all but party affiliation. Albert Einstein, for example, was called a “dupe and a fellow traveler” by Time magazine in 1949 for his outspoken belief in socialism.

These Marxist fellow travelers have been patiently awaiting their “Right People” to come riding up on their “White Horses” and usher in the grand American Marxist Utopia for nearly 100 years. Decade after decade they have slowly carefully infiltrated America’s Academia, Jurisprudence, Media and Political circles at the highest levels. Propagating their corrupt ideology by hand picking their protegees according to their ideology and using their positions of power and influence to ensure that their protegees become their successors.

Then, when Barack Insane Obama announced his candidacy, they saw what they believed was their Knight in shining armor. Their long awaited Marxist Messiah come to usher in the age of glorious Marxism, their Utopia. Here it was, their long years of suffering and patience were about to finally bear the fruit they had placed all of their hopes and dreams in. So what if every single attempt in the past to bring about a Marxist Utopia had resulted in the deaths of over a billion people, this time it would work, this time it would be the right people.

So a Fourth Estate that had been charged in no less than the United States Constitution’s very first Amendment with protecting the American people from tyranny of any sort, abdicated their moral and ethical responsibility to be the peoples advocates against corruption and became the very embodiment of systemic, endemic institutional corruption. All while claiming the very self same mantle of the voice of the people, projecting what they wanted and needed the America to believe, not what the American people actually believed into and upon everything they produced.

Yes, Fifth Column Treasonous Media is a perfect description of what they are and have become. Hanlon’s Razor absolutely does not apply to the Media. Their actions are not mere stupidity, but pure mendacious malfeasance.

As to the professional Bogging Class, theirs is a mixed story. Some in the Professional Blogging Class are every bit the children of Edward R Murrow (points at Michelle Malkin), (perhaps the last genuinely great American Journalist). Others can metaphorically trace their genetic linage to Samuel Langhorne Clemens or perhaps William F Buckley (points at Iowahawk and Patterico).

Yet a very wide swath of them (Points directly at Hot Air’s Ed Morrissey) are nothing less than the wannabe children of the disgraced, discredited and opprobrious former CBS Anchorman Dan Rather. They are the garage band wannabe rock stars of journalism. They follow the lead of the Fifth Column Treasonous Media carefully avoiding making any radical statements in terrifying fear of losing their “Media” creditability (and hence their possible future lucrative appearance fee’s and television face time).

The Fifth Column Treasonous Media has learned to manipulate the American people to a degree and in a manner that would make Nazi Germany’s Propaganda Minister Joseph Goebbels genuinely turn green with envy. Once upon a time the New York Times motto was “All the News that’s Fit to print”. That motto today could better be summed up as, “Only the Propaganda we want you to believe”.

They have long since abandoned the standards of the once sacred journalistic creed, the Five W’s. Once upon a time it was considered an abomination for a reporter or journalist to interject their own personal ideology or philosophies into their work. Hunter S Thompson hammered the final nail into objective journalism with his Gonzo journalism, now in the once hallowed place of objective journalism resides a narcissistic arrogant tin platted swaggering dictator with delusions of godhood who projects his own Marxist delusions upon an unsuspecting populace. Who decides what the public will think by either mocking and ridiculing those who fail to share his/her enlightened Marxist/Socialist/Progressive ideological world view, or by outright refusing to cover those stories that would expose the corruption of those ideologies.

The example of this odious practice are there for everyone to see, from the dishonest and deceitful treatment of the “TEA Parties” to the intentional burying of Obamanation Administration scandals like “Operation Fast and Furious” Benghazi, the IRS intimidation of Conservative politically active citizens, the NSA 4th and 5th amendment violations.

Consider the difference between how those above mentioned scandals have been treated, (not just by the Fifth Column Treasonous Media, but by the Professional Blogging Class as well) and how the entire media treated Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein reporting on the Watergate scandal. Yes, the Fifth Column Treasonous Media is utterly corrupt and totally disgraceful and many in the Professional Blogging Class are the fellow travelers of those fellow travelers carrying their water in the hopes of one day becoming Fifth Column Treasonous Media superstars themselves.