Those who (Heart) Mao

Mao Tse-Tung was a ruthless murder, what more can possible said about this Chinese communist dictator? His Great Leap Forward and Cultural Revolution killed 70 million Chinese people. That makes him the single greatest mass murderer in human history.

Joseph Stalin managed to kill 30 million Russian and Adolph Hitler 15 million Germans, compared to Mao they were mere amateurs, yet for some godforsaken reason the American Progressive Movement has chosen to lavish Mao with adoration and praise.

Why would these disturbed and misguided Americans choose to praise Mao? The reason is frighteningly obvious once you examine what motivates the American Progressive Movement. Because unlike Hitler or Stalin, Mao was never defeated by American or American backed forces.

Individuals who subscribe to the ideological philosophy that the end justifies the means populate the American Progressive Movement. For them, anything that allows them to institute the political policies, which they believe, will create a more secure and equitable societies are acceptable.

Personal freedoms and liberties take a second place to society at large and are therefore expendable on the individual scale. For these people there are no sacrifices to excessive, no abrogation’s of the individuals rights so draconian that they cannot not be accepted.

For generations Americans have pondered the question, how could the German people have embraced Adolph Hitler. The answer is, that Adolph Hitler promised the German people that he would make them a great people. All they had to do was make a few sacrifices for the greater good of Germany.

Likewise, Stalin promised the Russian people that they would be a great world power, but they also had to make personal sacrifices. Stalin was famously quoted as saying, “a hundred deaths is a tragedy, a million is a mere statistic”.

Yet neither Hitler nor Stalin managed to seize as much control over as many people as Mao, or kill as many of their own citizens as Mao did in his quest to create a perfect modern communist Utopian society.

Like it or not, as un politically correct as it is to say, we must face reality, the American Progressive Movement idolizes Mao because he was in their view a winner. Nobody was able to stop him from instituting his changes to society.

Again, like it or not as un politically correct as it is to say, the truth no matter how unpleasant it is, is that those people who make up the hardcore supporters of the American Progressive Movement are the same people who supported Adolph Hitler, Joseph Stalin and Mao Tse-Tung.

If we allow them to continue unfettered in their quest to create their perfect Utopian society, it will be future generation of some foreign nation asking their parents, pondering the question. How could the American people have allowed such evil people to rule over them?


Shall not be infringed.

in·fringe // //
v.   in·fringed, in·fring·ing, in·fring·es

v.   tr.

  1. To transgress or exceed the limits of; violate: infringe a contract; infringe a patent.
  2. Obsolete To defeat; invalidate.

v.   intr.
To encroach on someone or something; engage in trespassing: an increased workload that infringed on his personal life.

[Latin īnfringere, to destroy : in-, intensive pref.; see in-2 + frangere, to break; see bhreg- in Indo-European roots.]
in·fring’er n.

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

The progressive movement has been eroding this amendment since early on in the 20th century. Hiding their actions behind such vile and detestable terms as reasonable regulations and public safety.

The real truth is that the founding fathers left zero wiggle room regarding the regulation of firearms ownership. They made their thoughts on the subject absolutely crystal clear.

Benjamin Franklin: Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary
safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety.” (Nov 11 1755, from the Pennsylvania Assembly’s reply to
the Governor of Pennsylvania.)

Thomas Jefferson: “Laws that forbid the carrying of arms…disarm only those who are neither
inclined or determined to commit crimes. Such laws only make things worse for the assaulted and
better for the assassins; they serve to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man
may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man.” (1764 Letter and speech from T.
Jefferson quoting with approval an essay by Cesare Beccari)

John Adams: “Arms in the hands of citizens may be used at individual discretion in private self
defense.” (A defense of the Constitution of the US)

George Washington: “Firearms stand next in importance to the Constitution itself. They are the
people’s liberty teeth (and) keystone… the rifle and the pistol are equally indispensable… more than
99% of them [guns] by their silence indicate that they are in safe and sane hands. The very
atmosphere of firearms everywhere restrains evil interference [crime]. When firearms go, all goes,
we need them every hour.” (Address to 1st session of Congress)

George Mason: “To disarm the people is the most effectual way to enslave them.” (3 Elliot,
Debates at 380)

Noah Webster: “Before a standing army can rule, the people must be disarmed, as they are in
almost every country in Europe.” (1787, Pamphlets on the Constitution of the US)

George Washington: “A free people ought to be armed.” (Jan 14 1790, Boston Independent

Thomas Jefferson: “No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms.” (T. Jefferson papers,
334, C.J. Boyd, Ed. 1950)

James Madison: “Americans have the right and advantage of being armed, unlike the people of
other countries, whose people are afraid to trust them with arms.” (Federalist Paper #46)

History had to be revised by a progressive controlled educational system for these facts to be so ignored and watered down as to advance the notion the founding fathers found both insane and insulting, reasonable regulation and public safety.

Thomas Jefferson perhaps said it best.

Thomas Jefferson: “Laws that forbid the carrying of arms…disarm only those who are neither
inclined or determined to commit crimes. Such laws only make things worse for the assaulted and
better for the assassins; they serve to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man
may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man.” (1764 Letter and speech from T.
Jefferson quoting with approval an essay by Cesare Beccari)

The second amendment is not a States Rights issue, nor does the Federal Government have any constitutional authority to regulate firearms ownership, the constitution makes this indisputably and incontrovertibly clear.

Yet Federal administration after administration and State after State have completely and totally violated the letter of the law as spelled out in no uncertain terms in the Second Amendment to the US Constitution.

Furthermore, the FBI has documented and for the most part hidden their results which prove beyond any doubt that populated centers where individual gun ownership and right to carry laws exist have the very lowest assault, murder, and robbery levels in the entire country.

Federal and State gun regulations are not and never has been about providing public safety, they are and always have been about making stripping the constitutional rights away from citizens and increasing the governments control over individuals lives.

Ponder the words of the great and famous statesman Benjamin Franklin, consider where you fall in this great divide, are you on the side of the Founding Fathers of this Great Republic, or have you sided with the Progressive Movement, (and yes that really does mean communists) who are attempting to subvert the US Constitution?

Benjamin Franklin: Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary
safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety.” (Nov 11 1755, from the Pennsylvania Assembly’s reply to
the Governor of Pennsylvania.)

Choose you this day upon whose side you are on, I pray that the words of Sameul Adams are not spoken of you.

Sameul Adams:“If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquillity of servitude than the animating contest of freedom, — go from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains sit lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen!”

Much ado about nothing.

Today we celebrate… Nothing… This interestingly enough is apparently the required accomplishment for winning a Nobel Peace Prize. Make promises far beyond the ability of any single individual to fulfill and then epically fail and you are a shoe in for a Nobel Peace Prize.

If only the music industry worked in this fashion, I could promise to record the greatest album since the Beatles “Abby Road” or Jimi Hendrix’s “Electric Ladyland”, go into the studio, fuck around, produce a bunch of crap and yet still sell ten million copies and win a Grammy award.

I could, just by proclaiming myself the words greatest guitarist, receive all the accolades afforded to an individual whose skill and talent earned that recognition without I might add ever actually providing proof of that claim.

Now I don’t know about you, but as for myself, I couldn’t actually live with that. Oh, I’m not denying that the money wouldn’t be nice. However, the rest of it? I have a problem with making claims about myself that have absolutely no basis in reality what so ever.

Now I’m not claiming that I am perfect or anything or that I don’t exaggerate my own abilities a bit, but I do believe that an award given a person should have some genuine article of reality behind it, not simply empty words asserting as fact substance that simply does not exist.

Yes I do want to record a CD that will be the equal of the afore mentioned records, and hope that circumstances will permit me to one day soon make a genuine attempt at doing exactly that. Nevertheless, what I could not live with is claiming that I was going to record such an epic record, never actually doing so and yet still receiving the full accolades of having recorded such an album.

Unlike certain well-known public figures, I simply could not accept an award based entirely on my desire to achieve rather than actually making an effort to produce a valid effort at achievement.

Call me naive or simple minded if you must, but this is how I feel concerning awards given out for achievement. They should reflect actual genuine achievements as opposed to mere vague unsubstantiated desires to achieve.

It’s time to clean house, er Senate…

The United States Senate and House of Representatives is full of crocks, criminals and liberal/socialists and it is time to send them packing. Not just packing but also investigated with a full forensic audit for every single penny they have acquired during the entire time they have been in office.

First and foremost on my personal list, California Senator Barbra Boxer. Why? Because she is my Senator. Or would be if she weren’t a damned liberal/socialist democrat bent on enabling Barrack Obama’s attempt to destroy everything about the United States that our founding Fathers fought the Revolutionary War to create.

Let me be perfectly clear about one thing. Anyone who comes out of either political party and has their financial backing is in my mind instantly suspect of the same political corruption of those currently in office.

Cleaning house or congress to be more correct, will do us absolutely no good what so ever if we simply replace them with party members who are just as or even more corrupt then those we are replacing.

How does an average citizen compete against a corrupt political machine capable of funding their stooges with million of dollars in campaign financing?

The answer is an invention created to help scientists share their research; it’s called, that’s right, you guessed it, The Internet. This is where you the average American citizen take your country back; it’s where you the average citizen take your stand. It is where you make your voice heard and where you take genuine action.

Barbra Boxer is up for re-election in 2010, help send her packing, get behind an average citizen, not a professional politician, not someone funded with millions of dollars by shadowy figures with questionable motives.

Take a stand for the Republic our founding fathers risked their lives reputations and sacred honors to create.

I offer myself as a replacement for Barbra Boxer, I am not a professional politician, just an average middle class working stiff. If you cant vote for me, then for God’s sake find another average citizen who isn’t a professional politician and vote for them. Send this corrupt administration and congress a message that even Barrack Obama cant ignore.

Enviro-Nazi’s and the end of civilization.

The Environmental movement is a suicide pact. It is a denial of the truth of reality cooperative. In the name of preserving the environment, it advocates demand the death of billions of human beings whom its practitioners see as little more than parasite on mother Gaia.

Oh they claim self-righteously that they are trying to protect the environment for future generations while ignoring the reality of what affects the changes and regulations they demand would have on the earth’s current population.

Fossil fuels are killing the earth they scream, deforestation is killing everyone they moan, humans are stripping the natural resources and laying waste to the planet they breathlessly exclaim.

All the while ignoring the incontrovertible fact that the earths population can no longer be supported by the agrarian society that they advocate. The simple truth is that their proposed methods of energy production are completely incapable of ever supporting earth’s current population let alone it future growth.

The only way their proposed energy and agricultural methods of production can work is for 2/3 of earth population to cease to exist and future population levels be forcible maintained at static levels.

The problem with this is that civilization, as we know it, would completely collapse under their mandated production methods. Agrarian societies are stagnate societies, they do not advance in the sciences or arts beyond a level slightly above that of bare survival.

It is pure unadulterated self-inflected stupidity that motivates them to believe that an agrarian society is somehow purer or more desirable than the modern technological society that humankind has developed.

Mankind did not develop the technological society that we now enjoy because agrarian societies were better societies, but out of necessity. Our current technological society was invented because we as a race were tired of working until we dropped dead of exhaustion.

It was invented because we as a society were tired of seeing our loved ones die when they didn’t need to victims of chance or circumstances beyond our control. Therefore, we as a race decided to take our fates into our own hands and ensure the survival of those we held precious.

No more would we allow the fickle hand of nature to kill our crops when the rains failed to arrive on time or even at all, we chose to intervene with the advent of irrigation. We decided that loosing our best cropland to nutrient depletion in the soil could no longer be tolerated so we invented chemical fertilizers.

When our loved ones lives were threatened by injuries or illnesses we decided to develop medical procedures to restore them to health. We made the decision as individuals and as a society to advance our knowledge of the world we lived in so that those we loved and cherished would stand a better chance of surviving longer and having a better quality of life.

The price of this decision was to embrace a new type of society, a society that demanded certain conditions be fulfilled in order to achieve that goal. The conditions demanded were fairly basic. An infrastructure had to be created that allowed individuals the freedom away from physical labor to engage in academic study.

It required the infrastructure be created that permitted the large scale production of manufactured goods. No agrarian society is ever going to create a MRI machine or find a cure for cancer or AIDS. Nor will any agrarian society ever be able to support a modern hospital.

No agrarian society will ever be able to produce enough food to support earth’s current population. Nor will it ever be able to support any substantive increase in science or technology.

There is a reason it took six thousand years for our society to evolve as it has. That reason is inextricably tied to the ability of individuals to have the leisure time required away from physical labor to engage in academic study and the ability to distribute on a large scare the fruits of their research.

Without the large-scale generation of electricity that can currently only be provided by hydrocarbon fuel sources, our civilization dies. With the death of our civilization comes the death of nearly 2/3 of the earth’s population. Because without the infrastructure of our current civilization we can no longer feed our planets population, we can no longer provide them with life saving medical procedures and we can no longer protect them from members of the human race who have no morals or ethics beyond dominating those weaker then themselves.

Those who embrace today’s environmental movement have inflicted upon themselves the suicidal stupidity of failing to consider the impact of their idealisms upon the larger picture. The law of unintended consequences will not be avoided just because your intentions are noble.

In fact, if history has taught us anything, it’s that the noblest of intentions have been the root and cause of more suffering than any natural catastrophe in all of human history.

To the native Americans who have of recent told the enviro-Nazi’s to shut the fuck up and sit the fuck down, I say bravo sirs, thank you for having the courage to remind this great republic that there are wise and noble people still living in this republic.

The greatest evil ever invented.

The end justifies the means; this is the liberal left in America’s new ideology. Do what ever it takes to win and correct any social injustices afterwards. With this as their guiding ideological and philosophical mantra America’s liberal left has launched a new assault on American politics.

Within this frame work lays the Politics of personal destruction, enter Sarah Palin. A wife, a mother, a Christian and the Former Governor of the State of Alaska and the most public example of the politics of personal destruction ever seen on the stage of American politics.

There was no insult, slur or denigrating comment so vile or reprehensible that the win at any cost, ends justify the means crowd were not gleeful to throw at her. She represented a threat to their agenda that had to be neutralized at any cost. Any cost included truthfulness, decency morality and ethics. Every single one sacrificed at the alter of winning.

What the win at any cost, ends justify the means crowd don’t know or don’t care about is the historical record of their ideological and philosophical mantra. This ideological and philosophical mantra is not new, it did not originate with their unspoken intellectual guru Saul Alinsky.

It’s as old as human civilization and every single place and time it has been accepted and employed it has resulted in the most ruthless totalitarian societies conceivable. There is no act of depravity or injustice that cannot and has not been justified by those subscribing to this ideology.

Stanley Milgram did an experiment in the 1960’s that showed that the average human would engage in inhuman behavior towards innocent individuals if they believed that a sufficient authority figure had ordered them to. This observation is at the root of the Ends justify them means ideology.

It is why the Hitler’s and Stalin’s and Pol Pots of history were able to use the ends as a justification for the utterly unacceptable violence and dehumanization of their fellow human beings in the name of creating great societies.

Where the most ruthless violent totalitarian dictators went before us is exactly where we will go if this evil ideology is allowed to continue unchecked. The notion that it could not happen here in America is a child’s fantasy at best and a pathetic excuses for allowing evil to happen without taking action.

Fortunately for us the only thing required to end group think, is dissenting public opinions. If we sit by silently shaking our heads in disgust at the tactics of the left their group think will grow louder and stronger, if we give voice to opposing views the crowd will shake of the hypnotic effects of group think and begin to act as individuals again.

To defeat the liberal left we must expose their ideological agenda and publicly denounce it for the evil that it is. This does not mean that Saul Alinsky’s rules for Radicals is off limits  to the right, but it means that we must establish limits to what is acceptable and what is not and we must rigorously adhere to those limits.

It cant happen in America, like hell it cant, it is happening and the only thing that is going to stop it and reverse the tide is when moral and ethical people of conviction take a public stand and make it incontrovertible that those tactics are vile evil and totally unacceptable in America.

Assassinating President Obama

There is a recent and disturbing trend among liberals, suggesting that either Obama will be assassinated or that conservatives believe that he should be assassinated.  Let me be perfectly crystal clear on this subject.  That is an idea that borders somewhere between utterly insane or treasonous.

Anyone person that even momentarily consider this as a legitimate concept need to have their head examined, period end of story. Many things Obama may be, but one thing is absolutely unquestionable is, the President of the United States of America.

I will state for the record, I did not vote for Obama and I do not like him, I personally believe that he is a Marxist attempting to stage a bloodless communist coup here in the United States. That said, he is still the lawfully elected President of the United States of America.

Here in America we have a system in place that allows us to decide who will be the leader of this great republic and it absolutely does not include killing those that a majority of our fellow citizens have chosen.

The very notion that patriotic American citizens would, just because they are conservative, condone such an act is an amazing insult to the American people especially those of the conservative persuasion.

Any imbecile who dares to or is stupid enough to make such a assertion either in public or even to any other person is fully deserving of having the Secret Service’s most foul tempered pissed off angry investigators climb so far up their ass that the Secret Service agent can be seen peeking out their nose.

Moreover like this infantile suggestion, is the equally stupid and offensive liberal intellectual elite’s suggestion that the US Military will soon stage a military coup to overthrow the Obama administration and place senior military personal in place to combat political corruption.

Like the assassination meme this concept is offensive beyond belief. The United States of America is the worlds greatest Republic not some third world Banana republic.

My family has been a military family since the Revolutionary war; we have shed blood in every single conflict that The United States has ever been in. I cannot begin to express in words the anger or disgust that these ideas evoke in me.

Anyone stupid enough to attempt an assassination of President Obama should be convicted and sentenced to life in prison and any military officer that would consider a military coup deserves to finish their life making little rocks out of big rocks at Fort Leavenworth.

But more importantly whoever it is making these suggestion should straight up FOAD…