Atul Gawande: Marxist useless imbecile spews Marxist lies.

Atul Gawande like all Fifth Column Treasonous Media Marxist apologists resorts to half truth, innuendo’s and straight up lies to create a fictional world where only Marxist/Socialist ideology can correct the evils of a capitalist world.

States of Health
by Atul Gawande October 7, 2013

Ours can be an unforgiving country. Paul Sullivan was in his fifties, college-educated, and ran a successful small business in the Houston area. He owned a house and three cars. Then the local economy fell apart. Business dried up. He had savings, but, like more than a million people today in Harris County, Texas, he didn’t have health insurance. “I should have known better,” he says.

“I should have known better,” he says. Paul Sullivan took a calculated risk, every human being alive does this every single day of their lives. Most of the time doing so pays off, but not always. County morgues around the world are filled with the bodies of people who took calculated risks and died as a result of those calculated risks. No political ideology or agenda least of all a Marxist ideology or agenda will ever fix that.

For 99.99 percent of human history no medical insurance could have spared Paul Sullivan what he went through. The fact that Paul Sullivan is even alive to wander from homeless shelter to homeless shelter is a testament to the advances in medical technology and knowledge of the last 100 years. Advances that occurred thanks to Capitalism, not Marxism, Socialism or Communism. Marxism, socialism and communism on the other hand have killed more innocent human being in the last 100 years, than all of the wars and diseases on earth in the last 2000 years combined.

Atul Gawande goes on throughout his pathetic Marxist apologist rant to attempt to shift blame from his Marxist fellow travelers attempting to subvert the American Constitution to the Republican Party (whom I have no great love of) for the coming collapse of the economy.

This kind of obstructionism has been seen before. After the Supreme Court’s ruling in Brown v. Board of Education, in 1954, Virginia shut down schools in Charlottesville, Norfolk, and Warren County rather than accept black children in white schools.

As bald faced lies go, this is a doozy, but not unexpected from a member of the Fifth Column Treasonous Media. Let’s be 100 percent perfectly crystal clear here, there is absolutely no moral or logical equivalency between attempting to prevent the most vile and evil political ideology the world have ever known from “Fundamentally Transforming” America into a tyrannical totalitarian dictatorship and a bunch of racists trying to keep their school system segregated.

After playing a false analogy race card Atul Gawande whips out yet another liar liar pants on fire whooper.

Conservatives keep hoping that they can drive the system to collapse. That won’t happen. Enough people, states, and health-care interests are committed to making it work, just as the Massachusetts version has for the past seven years. And people now have a straightforward way to resist the forces of obstruction: sign up for coverage, if they don’t have it, and help others do so as well.

Not just no, but equivalently no. Conservative are not attempting to collapse the system, that is exactly what Obamacare was designed to do. Conservatives are attempting to prevent the collapse which is the sole and exclusive consequence that Obamacare is and was intended to produce. Dedicated Marxist useless imbecile that he is, I feel relatively confident that Atul Gawande is fully versed on something known as the Cloward-Pivens Strategy. Obamacare is NOTHING less than the Cloward-Pivens Strategy put into action.

Cloward–Piven strategy

The Cloward–Piven strategy is a political strategy outlined in 1966 by American sociologists and political activists Richard Cloward and Frances Fox Piven that called for overloading the U.S. public welfare system in order to precipitate a crisis that would lead to a replacement of the welfare system with a national system of “a guaranteed annual income and thus an end to poverty”. Cloward and Piven were a married couple who were both professors at the Columbia University School of Social Work. The strategy was formulated in a May 1966 article in liberal[1] magazine The Nation titled “The Weight of the Poor: A Strategy to End Poverty”.[2]

The two stated that many Americans who were eligible for welfare were not receiving benefits, and that a welfare enrollment drive would strain local budgets, precipitating a crisis at the state and local levels that would be a wake-up call for the federal government, particularly the Democratic Party. There would also be side consequences of this strategy, according to Cloward and Piven. These would include: easing the plight of the poor in the short-term (through their participation in the welfare system); shoring up support for the national Democratic Party then-splintered by pluralistic interests (through its cultivation of poor and minority constituencies by implementing a national “solution” to poverty); and relieving local governments of the financially and politically onerous burdens of public welfare (through a national “solution” to poverty)[citation needed].

1 The strategy
1.1 Focus on Democrats
2 Reception and criticism
3 Impact of the strategy
4 References

The strategy

Cloward and Piven’s article is focused on forcing the Democratic Party, which in 1966 controlled the presidency and both houses of the United States Congress, to take federal action to help the poor. They stated that full enrollment of those eligible for welfare “would produce bureaucratic disruption in welfare agencies and fiscal disruption in local and state governments” that would “deepen existing divisions among elements in the big-city Democratic coalition: the remaining white middle class, the working-class ethnic groups and the growing minority poor. To avoid a further weakening of that historic coalition, a national Democratic administration would be constrained to advance a federal solution to poverty that would override local welfare failures, local class and racial conflicts and local revenue dilemmas.”[3] They wrote:
“ The ultimate objective of this strategy—to wipe out poverty by establishing a guaranteed annual income—will be questioned by some. Because the ideal of individual social and economic mobility has deep roots, even activists seem reluctant to call for national programs to eliminate poverty by the outright redistribution of income.[3] ”

Michael Reisch and Janice Andrews wrote that Cloward and Piven “proposed to create a crisis in the current welfare system – by exploiting the gap between welfare law and practice – that would ultimately bring about its collapse and replace it with a system of guaranteed annual income. They hoped to accomplish this end by informing the poor of their rights to welfare assistance, encouraging them to apply for benefits and, in effect, overloading an already overburdened bureaucracy.”[4]
Focus on Democrats

The authors pinned their hopes on creating disruption within the Democratic Party. “Conservative Republicans are always ready to declaim the evils of public welfare, and they would probably be the first to raise a hue and cry. But deeper and politically more telling conflicts would take place within the Democratic coalition,” they wrote. “Whites – both working class ethnic groups and many in the middle class – would be aroused against the ghetto poor, while liberal groups, which until recently have been comforted by the notion that the poor are few… would probably support the movement. Group conflict, spelling political crisis for the local party apparatus, would thus become acute as welfare rolls mounted and the strains on local budgets became more severe.”[5]

Resisting evil is never an unconscionable act, Marxism and it’s bastard children Socialism and Communism are the political equivalent of a Perpetual Motion Machine. Those who agitate advocate or support Marxism and it’s bastard children are all either imbeciles studying to be morons and failing miserably, or they are sociopaths. Atul Gawande, like the vast majority of the Fifth Column Treasonous Media undoubtedly falls into the former, rather than the later camp, to arrogant and narcissistic and mind-numbingly stupid to have bothered doing their home work on Marxism.

In every single attempt at creating a perfect Marxist society since Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels devised this insane political ideology, the very first people lined up against the wall once the Marxist coup has succeeded have always been the Fifth Column Treasonous Media useless imbeciles who put the Marxist dictators into power in the first place. The reason is as rational and logical as it gets, since they were the ones who brought down the previous government, they must be eliminated to prevent them repeating what they did once the realization hits them that all they have done is replace one corrupt government with one that is 100 times as corrupt and evil. It’s the exact same reason that Stalin chased Trotsky all the way to Mexico to have him murdered. It’s why Castro forced Che into exile and eventually betrayed him to the CIA.


NBC give Obama a blow-job in public, and then wonders why everyone thinks they’re whores.

The Mainstream Media, also known as the Fifth Column Treasonous Media for painfully obvious reasons, can’t quite seem to understand why necrophiliacs, pedophiles and lawyers rate higher on the public trust scale these days. They poll themselves on a regular basis and discover that according to them, they are even handed, objective moderate politically sensitive individuals, their polls essentially say… “Fox was not responsible for the disappearance of those chickens — Signed Fox’s Mother”…

NBC is once again putting on public display that much vaunted handed, objective moderate politically sensibility that has become the hallmark of the Fifth Column Treasonous Media.

NBC Launches Week of Programming to ‘Help’ Obamacare Succeed

NBC announced today that it would be launching a week of programming to help Obamacare get off its feet, according to a press release sent out by the network. The law has been widely opposed by all Republicans and supported by most Democrats, including President Obama.

The headline of the press release reads:

NBC News Launches “Ready or Not, the New Healthcare Law,” a Multi-Screen Experience to Help Americans Get the Most Out of the Affordable Care Act

Dr. Nancy Snyderman Answers Most Pressing Questions Across Social and Via New Video Series #AskDrNancy

Interactive Tools and Resources Help Audience Navigate New Healthcare Benefits and Marketplaces

The NBC release says it will help explain how to enroll in Obamacare, a service no doubt to President Obama who has himself been barnstorming the country to try to boost enrollment in the program.

This is exactly the kind of bullshit Pravda used to pull back at the height of the old Marxist/Communist Soviet Union. It literally amount to nothing less than giving Obama a blow job in public, and then wondering why everyone laughs at them and calls them whores.

Choosing Barabbas.

During the 2012 Democrat National Convention the delegates willfully and intentional kicked God out the Democrat Party. It was only at the personal intervention of Barack Insane Obama that God was brought back into the Party, and even then only because Obama was a shrewd enough politician to understand that kicking God out of the Democrat Party Publicly would have disastrous consequences for his reelection bid. Barack Insane Obama did not insist on bringing God back into the Democrat Party out of any love for or faith in God, it was a purely political calculation.

Those who have read the New Testament are aware of who Barabbas was. When Jesus Christ was brought before Pontius Pilate according to the Gospel account, Pilate gave the Jewish citizen of Jerusalem a choice. Because it was the Highest of Jewish Holy Days, he could release one prisoner condemned to die. The choice was between Jesus of Nazareth or Barabbas a militant revolutionary and convicted murder. The Gospels tell us that the crowd, led by the religious leaders of Jerusalem chose Barabbas.

Now whether that actually happened or not is up for speculation, what is not up for speculation however is that the entire Jewish people have been slandered and maligned for the last 2000 years for having chosen a murder over Jesus Christ. This is not however the case that we are seeing today. Today, we are in fact witnessing a nearly perfect reenactment of that public choosing of Barabbas over Jesus Christ by the Democrat Party. The exact same Democrat Party that attempted to kick Jesus Christ out of their party at the 2012 Democrat National convention.

Texas filibuster champ ready to lead … Democrats

No, I’m not talking about Senator Ted Cruz, but the Texas filibuster champ that had been the delight of the media and of Democrats, if you’ll pardon the redundancy. Wendy Davis, who took the floor in an attempt to defend late-term abortion and unregulated clinics despite public sentiment heavily tilted against both, has chosen to ride that public sentiment into the Texas gubernatorial race:

Texas state Sen. Wendy Davis and her advisers have begun informing influential Democrats that she intends to run for governor in 2014, according to multiple sources familiar with Davis’s conversations.

The Fort Worth legislator made a national name for herself in June when she mounted a filibuster against new proposed abortion clinic regulations. Texas Republicans ultimately passed those restrictions into law in a special session called by outgoing Republican Gov. Rick Perry.

I’m not sure readers will remember that. That took place a long time ago, when the media found itself enchanted by gestures they’d later call pointless and empty, and celebrated them by highlighting the footwear of those who conducted those efforts. You know … three months ago.

Wendy Davis is a unapologetic advocate for the most vile, contemptuous and evil form of murder conceivable. Yes, that is what abortion is, it is the murder of the absolutely most innocent and vulnerable of all human beings. This is what the Marxist pretending to be Democrat Party has reduced itself to. Anyone who believes that they can support the murder of children, or maintain a neutral position on it and not be judged by God for doing so, is going to be in for the mother of all rude shocks on Judgement Day.

Whether Wendy Davis is successful in her bid for the Governorship of Texas or not is genuinely beside the point. The point is, the Democrat Party has made public their choice, and they have chosen Barabbas over Jesus Christ. The only question now remaining is will the State of Texas likewise raise it’s collective hand and chose Barabbas…

Dr Suess would not have hated Ted Cruz.

Dr Suess would not have hated Ted Cruz. Those asserting otherwise are not only lying assholes, they obviously did not know Theodor Geisel. Back in the 1980’s while I was working my way through college (I worked my way through college as a landscaper) I had the great privilege of having Dr Seuss as a client. For two years I met with Dr Seuss (Theodor Geisel) twice a week, every other Thursday at 7:00 am in the morning to tend his yard. He would met me at his gate in fuzzy slipper and bathrobe and accompany me to his back porch where prior to any work being done on his garden, we would first drink coffee or tea, have a English muffin and take about, well nearly anything you can imagine.

Bad news from Politico: Dr. Seuss would have hated Ted Cruz

I thought the grassroots attempt to get Cruz ceremonially expelled from an intellectual class to which he obviously doesn’t belong would be the most inane shot taken at him today, but no. No, apparently, Politico decided that Cruz reading “Green Eggs and Ham” to his kids on the Senate floor required the journo equivalent of Marshall McLuhan tapping that guy on the shoulder in “Annie Hall” to tell him he knows nothing of his work.

But yeah, for what little it’s worth, this is undoubtedly true:

“Not only would [Seuss] be offended at the misuse of ‘Green Eggs and Ham,’ but he’d be offended at almost everything that Ted Cruz stands for, which is to remove the safety net from poor people, poor and vulnerable people, he’s clearly more power hungry than he is compassionate and he’s a bully,” Dr. Peter Dreier, a professor of politics at Occidental College.

“Without a doubt, if Dr. Seuss were still around today, he would be poking fun at and criticizing Ted Cruz,” Dreier said…

“‘Green Eggs and Ham’ is about trying new things and giving it a chance and being open to change, right? And here’s Ted Cruz trying to stop Obamacare, really before it gets going,” Dreier said.

Here’s the quick-and-dirty Wikipedia section on Dr. Seuss the polemicist, replete with a charming footnote about how angry he was when the pro-life movement started using the line “A person’s a person, no matter how small” from “Horton Hears a Who.” He was an FDR Democrat and wasn’t above repurposing his books for easy anti-Nixon humor. He would, almost certainly, have loathed Ted Cruz. Maybe not as much as some people in Cruz’s own party, one of whom is now going around accusing Cruz of “governmental terrorism,” but still.

Let me tell you about the man I knew as Dr Seuss. Theodor Geisel (Dr Seuss) was interested in EVERYTHING. He was fiercely patriotic, while it is true that he was considered a liberal Democrat, by today’s standards he would be considered a Conservative. Yes, things have changed that much. He may have disagreed with Ted Cruz politically, but he would have by no conceivable stretch of imagination hated him. Dr Seuss was a compassionate, caring, loving gentle man, above all, he was funny. At worst he would have though Ted Cruz to be misguided and even that is not a given.

Theodor Geisel was an environmentalist, a real environmentalist not a watermelon, Marxist Red on the inside hiding behind the green of environmentalism. His concern for the environment was genuinely for the environment, not a convenient vehicle from which to advance a Marxist political agenda. His liberal tendencies sprung not from socialism, but from a genuine concern for the welfare of his fellow human beings. Many people thought and still believe that his comments regarding the internment of the Japanese in camps here in America during WWII was some strange aberrant deviation from his liberal beliefs, it was not. Those comments came from his fiercely patriotic side.

However you see Dr Seuss, keep this in mind, Theodor Geisel was a genuinely kind and gentle man, who wanted to see the world as a better place, he knew that it was not a perfect world and that sometimes living in a imperfect world meant that very hard things had to be done. Like Ronald Reagan, Theodor Geisel saw America as that shining city atop a hill, the true great hope for the entire world. He may have disagreed with Ted Cruz on how best to ensure that that beacon of hope continue to shine brightly throughout the long night, but he most definitely would not have hated Ted Cruz, From my own personal experience with Dr Seuss, I do not believe that it was even possible for him to hate anyone.

Charlie Rangel and the Brood of Vipers.

One of America’s most corrupt congressman, Charlie Rangel has made the decision to follow in the footsteps of the Serpent from the Garden of Eden. Those who have actually read the Book of Genesis will no doubt remember that the aforementioned Serpent, when he was working on deceiving Eve, misquoted God himself. There is nothing new about what Charlie Rangel is doing, hucksters, charlatans and scoundrels have very successfully used that page out of the Devils playbook pretty much since time itself began. Nobody will ever get away with accusing the Devil of not knowing what God said, he knows the Bible i.e. God’s word, as well if not better than any human being that has ever lived, save Jesus Christ.

Being able to quote, or in Charlie Rangles case, fold, spindle and mutilate the Bible, neither has, nor ever will save anyone. Nor will Charlie Rangle be an exception to that rule. Salvation, according the Christian doctrine is 100 percent dependent on believing that Jesus Christ is the Son of God, and asking him for forgiveness.

That said, Jesus Christ did tell his disciples “Render therefore unto Caesar the things which are Caesar’s; and unto God the things that are God’s”. One must remember though, Jesus Christ was no friend of Rome, he held Rome in utter and complete contempt. Nearly as much contempt as he held the Pharisees who governed Israel for the Romans. What Jesus Christ had to say about them is one of the most profound and deep statements he ever made, one which requires the reader to think very carefully about the significance of the statement.

“O vipers’ brood, who has warned you to flee from the coming wrath?

Jesus Christ came to earth on a mission, that mission was to save anyone who would repent. In order to repent, one has to know that they have transgressed and that their is a way for their transgression to be atoned for. In asking the question, “who has warned you to flee from the coming wrath?” Jesus Christ is making it indisputably clear that it was not he who had issued that warning.

Now think long and hard about that. Jesus Christ came here specifically to forgive anyone who would repent, to repent one has to have been warned, yet their is clearly a class, a group of people of whom Jesus Christ had no intention of warning. Not that he would have refused to forgive them should they genuinely repent, but he had no intention of going out of his way to warn them that they needed to repent.

Now, ask yourself, exactly who were those people that Jesus Christ had no intention of warning? According to the accounts given in the Gospels, they were those of the religious leaders of Israel who were using their authority as God’s spokespersons to defraud and cheat the Israelis. To quote Jesus Christ, they were those who had turned the House of God into a den of thieves.

Charlie Rangle and his ilk have likewise transformed the American Peoples House (Congress) into a den of thieves as well. It does not take a Rocket Scientist to be able to figure out that Jesus Christ would hold Charlie Rangle and his ilk in the same contempt that he held the Pharisees. Now to be fair, not all of the Pharisees of Jesus Christ’s time were under this condemnation, their were genuinely good and decent men who were Pharisees, just as their are genuinely good and decent men and women in Congress, but as then they are a minority.

Charlie Rangle would be well advised to take a long hard look at that statement of Jesus Christs,

“O vipers’ brood, who has warned you to flee from the coming wrath?

Because even 2000 years later, that statement is still aimed and and intended for the likes of Charlie Rangle.

“Please forgive me, we are not monsters.”

To the Islamist attacker that besieged the Nairobi shopping mall, ruthlessly killing those who were not Muslim, the words a small four year old boy spoke to you, “you’re a very bad man” may haven come out of the mouth of a four year old boy, but you can be absolutely certain that those words were in fact spoken by God Himself, speaking through the mouth of that four year old boy.

You and your fellow Jihadist have no heart to look into to see the truth of this statement, if you had, you would not have been in that shopping mall murdering anyone let alone people simply for not being Muslim. But the truth is, that even though your hearts be as dead as stone itself, still back in the very back of that sick and twisted mind of yours, you knew the truth, you knew that you were in fact monsters, and that God Himself was accusing you of exactly that as he spoke through that small four year old boy.

Yes, it is true, you are indeed monsters. It is not what you think you believe, nor what you profess of even pretend to believe that makes you a monster, it is what you do that makes you a monster. Even Islam recognizes the commandments given by God to Moses as God’s laws, “Thou shall not murder” not thou shall not kill. What you were doing was as clear a violation of that commandment as it is possible to be.

At the end of the day, strip away all of the religious and political rhetoric and you were murdering those people for nothing less than MONEY. You murdered them to advance the political control of your sect of Islam over that geographical location. So that your sect of Islam would have political control of the economy there. Though you cloak your evil in the garments of pious religion in the end the truth remains, what you did, you did for power and money and nothing else.

When God spoke to you through that small four year old boy, you recognized his voice, you recognized the truth of his accusation and you felt the irresistible need to plead your case, it was not Elliott Prior who you were asking forgiveness from, it was God Himself you were begging forgiveness from, and in the back of your mind you knew that, it is why you needed to claim that you were not monsters, it is why you needed to ask for forgiveness.

On that day that you stand before God to be judged for your actions, he will take you back to that shopping Mall in Nairobi and he will grant you the exact same mercy that you granted to those innocent people you murdered there. Those of you who practice Islam claim to recognize Jesus Christ as a prophet, yet you completely ignore what he said. It was Jesus Christ who uttered these words, “Judge not, that ye be not judged. For with what judgment ye judge, ye shall be judged: and with what measure ye mete, it shall be measured to you again.”

On that final day of judgement, you will receive the full measure of judgement that you passed upon those people in that shopping Mall in Nairobi, and if there is no one to take your judgement for you, then you will bear it’s full weight yourself. Yes mister Jihadist, mister mighty Islamic warrior, you are a monster, you are the very worst kind of monster.