Benghazi: The Stand down Order.

On June 17, 1972 individuals working for, but not under specific orders of President Richard M Nixon, broke into the Democratic National Committee (DNC) headquarters at the Watergate office complex in Washington, D.C. thus setting off attempts by Nixon to cover up his administrations involvement in the break-in at the Watergate complex. The actual crime itself was misdemeanor breaking and entry. The number of people who died was ZERO. The consequence of this, near-certain impeachment in the House of Representatives and equally certain conviction by the Senate, Nixon resigned the presidency on August 9, 1974.

Fast forward to September 11th 2012.

The Benghazi annex of the American Counsel in Benghazi Libya comes under attach by Islamic terrorists, Ambassador Christopher Stevens and three other Americans are murdered by the terrorists in a 14 hour long battle during which multiple requests are desperately made to the American Department of State, then headed by Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, for military assistance. Those requests are repeatedly rejected. But it gets worse than that, those requests are not just rejected, various military and CIA assets in the field who are also requesting authorization to to rescue Ambassador Stevens and his personal are told to “Stand Down”.

Benghazi security team on ‘Hannity’ slams Dems covering for the WH: ‘Don’t call us liars’

Members of the Benghazi annex security team challenged two congressmen to a debate on “Hannity” Thursday night after the Democrat lawmakers suggested that they’re continuing to perpetuate the “myth” of a stand down order.

The members of the security annex team, Mark Geist, John Tiegen and Kris Paronto came out earlier this month, telling Fox News that they were told, in fact, to stand down the night the U.S. consulate was attacked.

But at a recent news conference, Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) suggested they were only saying these things to promote their new book, “13 Hours: The Inside Account of What Really Happened in Benghazi,” Fox News Insider reported.

After the accusations, Paronto and Geist challenged Schiff to a debate on “Hannity.” Schiff declined, but Rep. Adam Smith (D-Wash.) accepted the challenge.

Smith said he doesn’t doubt that the men’s immediate superiors told them to stand down, but he rejects the idea that the order came from the White House.

“I don’t know how else to explain it. I want to say to Mr. Smith: was he there that night with us? Where was he? Because that’s what happened. We’re telling you what happened on the ground,” said Paronto.

There is absolutely no doubt that there was in fact a Stand down order issued. Such an order could only originate from either the Secretary of State or from the President of the United States of America. Standing orders have been in place since the 1980’s requiring the United States Military to send whatever military personal are required to protect American Diplomatic Counsels, those orders can only be contravened by either the Secretary of State or the President of the United States.

President Nixon did not order the break in at the Watergate complex, but when he became aware of it, he conspired with other members of his administration to cover up the break in because members of his administration were involved. Whether President Obama ordered the stand down or not one thing is indisputably clear, President Obama has conspired with members of his administration to cover up the fact that a Stand Down order was issued, an order which only he and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton had the authority to issue. So we have clearly and indisputable reached what can only be called a Nixionian crises. Not one single person died during the misdemeanor breaking and entry that President Nixon was covering up, four American diplomatic personal died as a result of the Stand down order that the Obama Administration is covering up.

Congress itself has thus far been utterly disgraceful in it’s handling of the Benghazi attack, it’s failure to hold the Obama Administration accountable borders on criminal, but it genuinely pales compared to the failure of the Mainstream Media to investigate. In fact, were America to have an honorable Attorney General the Mainstream Media would probably have already been charged under the RICO Statues for engaging in Conspiracy to aid and abet in the commission of a crime for their part in the cover up of the Stand Down order.


What is the surest and fastest way to get Snoop Dog and P Diddy to call you…

Charlo Greene, former KTVA-TV reporter (an attractive African American woman, by the way) has just found the perfect way to get Snoop dog and P Diddy’s attention…

KTVA reporter quits on-air, reveals herself as owner of Alaska Cannabis Club

Reporter Charlo Greene quit on-air during KTVA-TV’s 10 p.m. newscast Sunday, revealing herself as the owner of the medical marijuana business Alaska Cannabis Club and telling viewers that she would be using all of her energy to fight for legalizing marijuana in Alaska.

Greene had reported on the Alaska Cannabis Club during Sunday night’s broadcast, without revealing her connection to it. At the end of the report, during a live shot, she announced that she was the club’s owner and would be quitting.

“Now everything you’ve heard is why I, the actual owner of the Alaska Cannabis Club, will be dedicating all of my energy toward fighting for freedom and fairness, which begins with legalizing marijuana here in Alaska,” she said. “And as for this job, well, not that I have a choice but, fuck it, I quit.”

And with that, she walked off camera.

I’m sure that in person Snoop and Diddy are wonderful human beings, all I have to say here is… Good luck girl… you’re going to need it…

How corrupt is corrupt?

The Webster’s Dictionary for accuracy should have a picture of the Obama Administration right next to the word corrupt. It isn’t just Eric Holder’s department of Injustice, or even Barack Obama himself. It is a culture of pure political corruption that obviously runs through the administrative levels of every federal bureaucracy. Lois Lerner is the poster child for that corruption.

Lerner speaks! (To Politico)

posted at 9:21 am on September 22, 2014 by Ed Morrissey

The woman who made herself infamous for refusing to testify in the IRS scandal has finally broken her silence … to Politico, anyway. Flanked by lawyers during the interview, Lerner insists she did nothing wrong while running the tax-exempt unit at the IRS when it singled out conservative groups for investigation. If that’s the case, though, why is she telling that to Politico now rather than the House Oversight Committee then?

Lois Lerner is toxic — and she knows it. But she refuses to recede into anonymity or beg for forgiveness for her role in the IRS tea party-targeting scandal.

“I didn’t do anything wrong,” Lerner said in her first press interview since the scandal broke 16 months ago. “I’m proud of my career and the job I did for this country.”

The Inspector General of the Treasury certainly thought someone did something wrong. The original report revealed a concerted effort to target conservative groups seeking tax-exempt status for their efforts, while progressive applicants got a much easier ride. That targeting took place in Lerner’s unit, and just to emphasize that, Lerner and her management staged an apology right before the IG report went public in May 2013. Then-IRS commissioner Steve Miller acknowledged that he and Lerner staged that apology to take the sting out of the exposure of the targeting plot a week after it was given:

IRS Lawyers Admit Lois Lerner Obstructed Justice

Via FoxNews, IRS lawyers have dropped a bombshell admission that Lois Lerner’s Blackberry was intentionally wiped and destroyed after the start of the Congressional probe into the activities of her division:

Lois Lerner’s Blackberry was intentionally destroyed after Congress had begun its probe into IRS targeting of conservative groups, a senior IRS lawyer acknowledged in a sworn declaration.

Thomas Kane, Deputy Assistant Chief Counsel for the IRS, wrote in the declaration, part of a lawsuit filed by Judicial Watch against the IRS, that the Blackberry was “removed or wiped clean of any sensitive or proprietary information and removed as scrap for disposal in June 2012.”

That date – June 2012 – is significant because by that time, ex-IRS official Lerner had already been summoned before congressional staffers who interviewed her about reports of the IRS’ targeting of conservative groups.

This is a fairly astonishing admission and it’s difficult to see how this does not constitute textbook Obstruction of Justice under 18 USC 1505 (and possibly other statutes):

Whoever, with intent to avoid, evade, prevent, or obstruct compliance, in whole or in part, with any civil investigative demand duly and properly made under the Antitrust Civil Process Act, willfully withholds, misrepresents, removes from any place, conceals, covers up, destroys, mutilates, alters, or by other means falsifies any documentary material, answers to written interrogatories, or oral testimony, which is the subject of such demand; or attempts to do so or solicits another to do so; or
Whoever corruptly, or by threats or force, or by any threatening letter or communication influences, obstructs, or impedes or endeavors to influence, obstruct, or impede the due and proper administration of the law under which any pending proceeding is being had before any department or agency of the United States, or the due and proper exercise of the power of inquiry under which any inquiry or investigation is being had by either House, or any committee of either House or any joint committee of the Congress—
Shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 5 years or, if the offense involves international or domestic terrorism (as defined in section 2331), imprisoned not more than 8 years, or both.

Caselaw on obstruction of justice indicates that it does not matter whether the emails in question were in fact held on a central server, you can be dinged for obstruction for the attempt to destroy the information if you delete mails in, say, your Outlook inbox even though your company keeps all emails on a central server. It is intended to protect against the eventuality where (as here) the emails in question mysteriously go missing from the central server or the person responsible for retrieving them claims that it would be impossible or impractical to do so. Not to mention the fact that you don’t get a free pass for obstruction of justice just because you’re not smart enough to do it properly.
Every new revelation in this case points to an aggressive effort on the part of the IRS to improperly and possibly illegally hide evidence from the public as to its activities. It is past time for someone at DOJ to show as much interest in the proper administration of justice with respect to the IRS as they did to Arthur Andersen.

Her protestations to the contrary, there is simply no doubt that Lois Lerner knowingly willingly and with a full forethought of malice committed felony level criminal actions. Richard Nixon was forced to resign from the Office of President of the United States of America mere hours ahead of certain Impeachment over far less serious criminal actions taken on his behalf by his subordinates.

After his assertions that there was not even a smidgen of corruption over at the IRS, Barack Obama should be held to the exact same standard as Richard Nixon was held to.

If there is any place in America more corrupt that the Obama Administration (shocking as this assertion may seem) then it can only be Congress itself. It is Congresses responsibility to ensure that Lois Lerner and every other bureaucrat who like Lois Lerner, willfully and knowingly breaks the law, is held to the fullest accountability by the law. Failure by Congress to do so has but only a single solitary consequence, and that is to destroy the public’s faith in the America legal system and by extension, the government of the United States of America.

13th Anniversary of 9/11

The imbecilic socialist/Marxist Democrats were hoping that the war on terror would be long over by now so that they could return to plundering the wealth of America’s middle class. Obama and the democrats didn’t object to the wars in Iraq or Afghanistan because they thought those wars were wrong, despite what they might claim, no they objected because the money spent on those wars, was money they could not steal.

Now Obama wants half a trillion dollars to fight ISIS/ISIL. ISIS/ISIL wouldn’t even exist were it not for Barack Obama’s pure stupidity. So here we are, 13 years after 9/11/01, and thanks to Barack Obama, we’re right back where we started in the war on terror. There is one significant difference this time though. Barack Obama gave 5 million dollars and 5 top generals back to the terrorists in trade for a deserter and traitor so that he could claim that he had won the war on terror.


Now with that out of the way, I haven’t been writing much lately because I am back in school. I’m studying to obtain a welding certificate. Here are some pictures of me learning to weld, and some of my crappy music to listen to while you are looking at the pretty pictures.