What really happened at the G7 Summit.

“International cooperation cannot be dictated by fits of anger and throwaway remarks,” President Emmanuel Macron’s office said in a statement to AFP.

German Chancellor Angela Merkel says she finds President Donald Trump’s tweet disavowing a common statement after the Group of Seven summit in Canada “sobering” and “a little depressing.”

In an interview Sunday on German public television, Merkel also says European leaders won’t be “taken advantage of” on trade.

Trudeau had said Canadians “are polite, we’re reasonable, but also we will not be pushed around.”

Why exactly is it that Germany, France and Canada had these things to say? The answer is painfully simple. Germany, France and Canada are failed socialist states propped up by massive trade imbalance with the United States. Trump basically told them, “This is over” and like heroin addicts suddenly facing the threat of having their heroin supply cut off, the leaders of Germany, France and Canada reacted angrily.

Germany, France, Canada and China have all been putting their thumb very heavily on the “Fair Trade” scales for decades and Trump came to the G7 Summit and told them in no uncertain terms. Either take your thumbs off the scales, or the US will reciprocate in equal measure.

Germany, France and Canada told Trump, but we have always had our thumb on the scale, it’s our right to have our thumb on the scale. Trump told them, No, no it is not and it ends now. If you do not take your thumb off the scale, we will match every single one of your tariffs with equal tariffs of our own.


Anthony Bourdain, Kate Spade and Suicide.

In the last week both Anthony Bourdain, and Kate Spade committed suicide. Both were incredibly successful individuals who seemed to have everything to live for, who seemed to have the perfect lives. Yet, both made the conscience decision to end their lives. That’s it, it’s over, I’m done, I’m out seems to be their last public statements.

The thing here, is that while Anthony and Kate are extremely high profile individuals whose suicides are breaking news events, what they are not, is some kind of rare exception. Suicide is in fact now designated as the 10th leading cause of death in the United States.

CDC: Suicides increased by more than 30 percent since 1999 in half the states

More than a decade of steadily rising rates have made suicide the nation’s 10th leading cause of death and one of only three causes of death — including Alzheimer’s disease and drug overdoses — that are increasing in the U.S., according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

In a report that examines trends in suicide at the state level from 1999 to 2016, the CDC says suicide rates have increased in nearly every state. In half the states, the agency found the rate rose more than 30 percent.

In releasing the report — the same week fashion designer Kate Spade was found dead by suicide — CDC officials noted that more than half of those who died by suicide — 54 percent — did not have a known diagnosed mental health condition.

For decades we have been told that suicide was an indication of some form of mental illness, or that it was a desperate cry for help. There are even circles within our society that condemn suicide as the ultimate act of narcissistic selfishness.

We spend massive amounts of money on suicide prevention programs, almost as much as we spend of murdering unborn babies. Euthanasia, as it is euphemistically called, is in fact big business. From America’s Dr Jack Kevorkian to Australia’s Dr. Philip Nitschke there are all around the world, those individuals who profit from various individuals desire to end their residency in the land of the living.

Meet the Elon Musk of Assisted Suicide, Whose Machine Lets You Kill Yourself Anywhere

As a young medical school graduate, Nitschke found himself drawn to the world of euthanasia and the work of Dr. Jack Kevorkian, the most famous euthanasia proponent in the United States. Inspired by Kevorkian’s death machine, Nitschke set out to create an updated version that he called “the Deliverance.” The machine was rudimentary, comprising only a laptop hooked to an IV system, but it worked. A computer program would confirm a patient’s intent to die and then trigger a lethal injection of barbiturates. It successfully ended four lives before Australia repealed the bill that legalized euthanasia in 1997.

Flip the switch and you’re done, the usher will show you to the nearest exist.

Its a funny thing, this attitude of ours about suicide. We spend hundreds of millions on suicide prevention, and we legalize it. What is abortion if it is not the assisted euthanasia of an individual who neither requested nor consented to being euthanized?

Why do I keep bringing up abortion in the context of suicide? How can the two possibly be related except for the fact that both are the termination of life? The answer is both painfully simple and horribly complex at the exact same time. Moreover, it involves a disgusting hypocrisy and an unwillingness to look honestly at the consequences of public policy and social conditioning.

Suicide and abortion share in common this single and inseparable bond. Both are the direct consequence of the de-sanctification and devaluation of human life. A fetus is just a clump of cells, like any malignant cancerous growth, right?

Let me show you were that logic inescapably leads.

A fetus is a programmed biological machine, like a computer, it has a specific instruction code that tells it what to do.

A human fetus always produces a human being, it never produces a Dolphin or a dinosaur or a elephant.

A fetus is a living organism that is constantly expending energy in the process of developing into a mature human being.

The second that you place the designation upon a human fetus as “Just a clump of cells” you designate all human beings, regardless of which state of development they are at, as just being clumps of cells. Here is why. If you have a living organism, the state of its development is predicated upon one thing, and only one thing, and that one thing, is that it be alive.

Inanimate matter, non living matter does not violate physics basic fundamental laws of conservation of energy or entropy. In other words, inanimate objects never go from disorganized states to highly organized states. Only living things violate these fundamental laws of physics. In order to get a living organism to quit violating these principals, you have to kill it. This is true of a human fetus, except for very rare circumstances, human fetuses will not spontaneously self terminate.

By designating a human baby as a fetus, you make a very clear delineation, from this point to this point, you are not human, and therefore have no value. From this point to this point you are a human being and therefore are valuable enough that it becomes a crime to kill you, and then finally again, from this point to this point, your status as a human being is determined but now you are a burden, therefore you are no longer designated as having sufficient value to deserve protections against being killed.

Once you cast aside all of the hypocrisies and euphemisms the equation you are left holding is, You are only a human being and therefore of any value to society so long as you fit between these designated criteria markers. Your life is only worthy of protection so long as it fits within the boundaries of those criteria. You only have worth so long as you fit within the boundaries of those criteria.

The value of human life, right there, has been reduced to ZERO. Conditional parameters on values are arbitrary and once you have reduced human life to arbitrary parameters it’s game set and match, the usher will show you to the nearest exit.

Wait, what? Abortion is not suicide, how can these even be remotely related. Life is either precious and sacred, or its not. Once you have designated any aspect of life as not being precious or sacred, you have placed life in arbitrary parameters which can and will be moved by both individuals and societies as a whole. If the most innocent and vulnerable can be designated as not human, and unworthy of the protections of society, then the parameters that define humanity and value can be shifted to any other segment of society.

Take away the humanity, the sanctity of the unborn, and you have created a parameter whereby based on certain criteria it is acceptable to terminate that life. Once you have done that, those parameters, those criteria can then be moved to the elderly, to the infirm. Now you have further reduced the value of human life. And having done so you have opened the door to self termination for ANY reason.

54 percent of all suicides show no prior indications of mental instability. That is because the only thing wrong with them, was that they accepted what society told them. What society told them was, there is no inherent sanctity to human life, there is no inherent value to human life. There is nothing special or sacred about human life.

The hypocrisy of society in setting these parameters and criteria while also pretending want to prevent individuals from self terminating is staggering and foul. The truth here, is even more brutal than most realize. We do not have suicide prevention programs to stop anyone from committing suicide. Suicide intervention is not about intervening or preventing suicide.

Suicide prevention/intervention is about anesthetizing society. If you have a loved one who committed suicide odds are it left you stunned and confused and more than a little hurt. It is in fact quiet common for those who have a loved one who committed suicide to be emotional devastated by the suicide. Somehow they must have missed the desperate cries for help, somehow they must have failed their loved one, somehow there must be some responsibility born because you did not act to save your loved ones life.

So suicide prevention/intervention programs were invented to work as a narcotic to anesthetize, to take away the pain of those who had lost someone to suicide. On one hand society devalued human life to convenience within set parameters and on the other pretends compassion for those mourning or being tormented in agony by the loss of life.

The question should not be, how did suicide become the 10th leading cause of death in the United States, we know how it became the 10th leading cause of death, it did so because we told everyone in America, your life only has value or meaning, so long as it fits within these highly mobile parameters.

If anything, we should be asking, why are more people not committing suicide. You cannot ask someone who committed suicide, hey, why did you commit suicide? You actually don’t even need to, because the answer is inherent in the question itself. They committed suicide because they wanted out. Why they wanted out is a far more complex question, one that merely knowing why they committed suicide does not answer.

If you can answer why more people, given that society has reduced everyone to arbitrarily set definitions of valuable, have not committed suicide you have a far better chance of understanding why anyone would commit suicide. Why did you think that ending your life was a viable option? Sorry, again, that is the wrong question. Its not what they thought, its what they did not think. They did not think their life was valuable enough to keep or protect. They ended their own lives because their own life did not have any value to them.

Why didn’t they think that their own lives were valuable enough to protect or preserve? Because society hammered into every fiber of their beings that there is not inherent sanctity or value to life. That life only has sanctity or value if and when society says it does. If society can set those parameters, and it has, then so can the individual, and once the individual has concluded that it is the arbiter of those parameters, those parameters and criteria will be set based upon the emotional condition of whomever is setting them.

There is only one way to genuinely prevent suicide. That is to eliminate the underlying foundation of why people commit suicide in the first place. People only commit suicide for one single solitary reason, and that reason, is to get out. To take the nearest exit. If you want to prevent people from committing suicide the very first thing you absolutely must do, is remove the exit sign that says, suicide is the way out. The sign that says, “This way to the egress”.

Before you can remove the exit sign associated with suicide, life itself has to have an inherent sanctity and value that is not arbitrarily defined by society and cannot be shifted around for societies convenience. There must be no part or aspect of life that is not sacred, valuable or worth protecting. Only human beings kill their unborn because they are inconvenient. You want to see the truth that nature knows and still practices despite humanities abandoning of that truth? Go get yourself between a mamma bear or lion and her cubs. Even alligators and sharks protect their young, only humans institutionally kill them. Coincidentally, only humans commit suicide.

No other living species on earth commits suicide, but then again, no other species on earth needs to justify its own existence, or justify why it deemed some other living creature worthy of dying.

So, why did Anthony Bourdain and Kate Spade commit suicide? For exactly the same reason everyone else who has ever committed suicide did. Because they decided it was time for them to leave, time for them to take the exit. Why did they decide to take the exit, why did they decide that death was preferable to life? Undoubtedly, like every one else who has ever committed suicide, the single most important factor in their decision process boils down to “Worth”. Was remaining alive worth it to them. And the answer, in every single case is self evident, no it was not.

In every single case of suicide, the individual committing suicide decided that whatever risks or unknowns lay behind the exit sign, what remained on this side of that exit sign was not worth remaining behind for. Eventually everyone dies, this is an inescapable reality. It is only when you believe that there is nothing special or sacred about being alive that you consider death an acceptable alternative to living. No other creature on earth accepts death willingly or without a fight. Every other living creature fights tooth and nail for every single millisecond of life.

Why? Because unlike human beings they all know and accept without qualification how precious life is. You cannot reason any other creature on earth into accepting the premise that life has any parameter or criteria attached to it where by it ceases to be sacred or precious enough to be fought over tooth and nail. No matter what you say or do, no other living creature on earth can be convinced to surrender its life. What you do not and never will see, is any other living creature willingly walk up to the exit and say, that’s it, its over, I’m done.

Only human beings can be convinced to end their own lives, and the only way to convince a human being to end their own life, is to convince them that there is something about death that is more valuable or desirable than remaining alive. Before you can do that, you have to convince them that life itself has no inherent sanctity or preciousness. That its only value is that which we determine that it has, only then can you convince them to exchange it for something else. Only then can you convince them that whatever unknown awaits on the other side of the exit, what remains here either has less value, or is more frightening or painful than the risk of what the unknown might be.

Seriously, Why isn’t Google being investigated for illegally influencing US Elections?

There is an old saying, “Nobody every gets caught just the one time” its a reference to criminals getting caught breaking in the law. What it means is, if you caught them, it wasn’t one the very first time they broke that specific law. The saying is a truism, a broad overly sweeping generalization regarding human nature.

The problem with that statement, isn’t that it is painting with a broad and unkind brush, but that like most truisms, there is far more true in it than ism. If a criminal is arrested for lets say burglary, the probability that the criminal was caught on their very first burglary attempt is somewhere near, 0. Of course there are always exceptions, but, as the term exception itself implies, while they exist, they are relatively rare.

Very recently, as in, just a few days ago recently Google found itself furiously backtracking and making the same tired old excuses when it was discovered that they had been telling everyone that the California Republican Party was a Nazi ideological Party.

No, it was… some hacker who vandalized the Wikipedia page that did it.

So… Here we go again

Google is labeling a Trump-supporting Republican state senator a “BIGOT”

Is it a coincidence? Is this the first time Google got caught breaking into homes and stealing stuff? Is this just a simple case of teenage kids acting out, doing stupid things because they thought it would be cool? No. No it isn’t. This is the above cited truism. Google has been doing this for a long time and has been emboldened by their continued success to become ever more brazen, just like every other criminal whose crime spree goes unchecked for a long time.

Google got caught multiple times during the 2016 presidential election cycle manipulating search results in an effort to choose winners and losers in the 2016 election. Over and over and over the same lame ass excuse. It wasn’t us.

As Google Fights Fake News, Voices on the Margins Raise Alarm

As the dominant search engine, with an estimated 90 percent global market share, Google was criticized by both the right and the left of the political world during the 2016 election.

In June 2016, a video from the pop culture site SourceFed accused Google of manipulating automatically completed search suggestions to favor Hillary Clinton. Google denied the claim, but right-wing media seized on the video as an example that the company was tipping the scales in her favor.

Google has been putting their thumb on the scale for pretty much ever. Initially it was just as a way to earn money. Search results would lend a little extra weight towards those that engaged in paid advertising. But Google it seems got away with so much for so long, that its employees began to think of themselves as “Gods”.

As with most tech companies, the majority of Google’s employees are far left liberals. Which is not surprising given that their education was brought to them courtesy of the Marxist educational System that produced Berkeley Professor Eric Clanton, and Yvonne Felarca, a 47-year-old teacher at Berkeley’s Martin Luther King Jr. Middle School.

These two #Antifa terrorists are not even remotely an aberration within the American Educational System. They are simply the tip of the iceberg that has been caught. These two were physically apprehended for using violence to advance their Marxist agenda. They were literally teaching their students using the age old adage of, lead by example.

If this is what the teachers are willing to do, is it really that difficult to imagine what the students are willing to do? No, you are not working for Google if you do not have a degree in Computer Science, if you do have a degree in Computer Science, odds are you are a little Socialist/Marxist useless imbecile and don’t even know it. Why? because Eric Clanton, and Yvonne Felarca were your teachers.

So is it any surprise that Google believes that they can call the California Republican Party the Nazi Party just days before the California primary elections, or that they believe they can get away with calling Trudy Wade, a Republican state senator from North Carolina, a Bigot and then all they have to do to avoid any criminal complications is to claim that the dog ate their homework?

Smoking Hot Nerd of the Month: This Old Tony

As most of you have probably noticed by now, I love me some good youtubage. Once again, my pick for Smoking Hot Nerd of the Month goes to an individual whom is known only by his youtube channel name. TOT, as he sometimes refers to himself, is somewhat enigmatic. Not just in the, “Who is This old Tony” kind of way, but also in the “How does he know all this stuff” sort of way.

This old Tony’s youtube channel obstinately takes place in Tony’s garage. And his video’s are filled with a constant flow of intentional and hilarious malapropisms and absurd sight gags. The activities that take place on his channel, are basically machine shop techniques, throw in a bit of CNC here and there and the long running gag on engineering math (Egyptian hieroglyphic’s anyone?) and you have This Old Tony.

Now Tony portrays himself on his channel as something of a self taught hobbyist, and that might very well be the case, though I would not be surprised in the slightest to find an actual mechanical engineering hiding beneath TOT’s cool exterior.

So, give TOT a few views, and decide for yourself, hopefully you’ll see why he made this months Smoking Hot Nerd of the Month.

Oh, and none of Mrs TOT’s household devices were damaged in any of his video’s… (yea right)…

The Carolina Reaper up the old poop chute I’m offended Award for fake outrage goes to…

Please allow me to introduce our contestants…

First we have Jason Furman. Jason was President Barack Obama’s former economic adviser. Given Jason’s and his former bosses inability to murder America’s economy as they had planned, and President’s Trump’s success in reversing the damage they were able to inflict on the American economy his petulant outburst places Jason in the pole position in this race for the Carolina Reaper up the old poop chute I’m offended Award for fake outrage contest.

Our next contestant is Austan Goolsbee, Obama’s former chief economic adviser. If grasping at straws were a category in the Carolina Reaper up the old poop chute I’m offended Award for fake outrage contest, Austin would be a shoe in.

And finally, an added bonus contestant, The POLITICO STAFF, Politico, a bastion of Marxist apparatchik propaganda wannabe’s, while the weak horse in this race, Politico definitely has the stamina to go the distance.

Obama officials slam Trump after he breaks protocol with jobs numbers tease

Quarter after quarter, the Trump administration economic number’s have been the envy of every presidential administration for the last 50 years to suggest that Trump violated some law by tweeting that he couldn’t wait to see the numbers can only be seen in one possible light. Not that the president violated any law, but that those complaining have had a Carolina Reaper Pepper shoved up their poop chutes because their incompetence in handling the economy under former President Barack Obama is being so thoroughly highlighted.

This isn’t just bad news for the Obama legacy, it is a genuine crisis for the Marxist Democrat party. The so called “Worker’s Party” whose only accomplishment was to “Fundamentally Transform” the nations worker’s into unemployed citizens and wards of the State.

Black unemployment rate hits new record low in May

The unemployment rate for black workers hit new record lows in May, the Labor Department’s Bureau of Labor Statistics reported Friday.

Black unemployment fell sharply to 5.9 percent, beating out the 6.6 percent record low that was set a month earlier.

Can we say, “Mass exodus of African-American’s from the Democrat Party now?”

Unemployment Rate Falls to 18-Year Low; Solid Hiring in May

WASHINGTON—The unemployment rate fell to an 18-year low in May and employers steadily added jobs, signs of enduring strength for the labor market.

U.S. nonfarm payrolls rose a seasonally adjusted 223,000 in May, the Labor Department said Friday. The unemployment rate ticked down to 3.8%, matching April 2000 as the lowest reading since 1969.

Wages in May improved modestly, growing 2.7% from a year earlier.

Economists surveyed by The Wall Street Journal had expected 190,000 new jobs and a 3.9% unemployment rate.

When viewing these economic numbers, one must keep firmly fixed in mind that these numbers are coming in despite the unrelenting 90% hate filled rhetorical war being waged against President Trump by the Fifth Column Treasonous Marxist Mainstream Media and their parent organization the American Marxist Democrat Party. A constant barrage of Fake News stories, Fake Scandals and racist tyrannical denigrating accusation hurled daily have utterly failed to stop or even slow down President Trump’s American Economic Recovery agenda.

Please cast your vote in the comment section below for today’s Carolina Reaper up the old poop chute I’m offended Award for fake outrage Award…

Instead of Investigating Trump for colluding with the Russian’s, Mueller should be investigating Google.

President Donald Trump has been accused of colluding with Russian’s to influence the 2016 presidential election. The evidence just isn’t there to support this absurd assertion. The truth gets uglier and harder to ignore every day. If Robert Mueller were not on a witch hunt to overthrow the lawfully elected president of the United States of America because he is not who the Deep State chose to be POTUS, then Mueller would no doubt be investigating, well, nothing, because, the Deep State and the Democrat aren’t about to support or demand an investigation into actual illegal election influencing or tampering, or voter fraud.

IF, and of course that’s an IF the size of the entire Milkyway Galaxy, they were interested in investigating who has been attempting to illegally influence, tamper or otherwise promote voter fraud, (besides themselves of course) the very first place they, were they actually serious, would look, would be no further than Google.

Google is claiming that this was an accident caused by someone vandalizing a Wikipedia page, which the Google knowledge panels then attributed to the California Republican Party. I personally am calling bullshit on Google’s lame ass excuse. Bullshit, Google did this on purpose. Google should be under investigation for illegally attempting to influence the 2018 California primaries.

Its no secret that Google and the various Social Media companies are ardently anti conservative. They have systematically engaged in bias, misrepresentation, and outright censorship of conservative voices for years now. Google pleads innocence but the damage is already done. Let a Special Prosecutor be empaneled to investigate Google and the rest of the Social Media companies and determine if they have been intentionally violating federal election laws.

What Google has done isn’t merely unacceptable, it is as corrupt as well as morally and ethically repugnant as it gets. Roseanne Barr was fired and her hit TV show canceled for a far less offensive outburst on twitter. Roseanne disparaged a single individual, Google insulted denigrated and disparaged millions of Californian’s and attempted to sway the outcome of the California Primaries. Heads should roll and people should go to prison.

The March of the Marxist Censorship Apologists.

It isn’t just America, the whole world is suffering from this tyrannical abuse. Its called, “Politically Correct”, but what it really is, is tyranny in the form of censorship. With each passing year, it becomes more constrictive, more abusive. Speech for me (if I happen to be a Liberal Marxist) but not for thee.

Every year a new subject, word, term or phrase is added to the list of things that you are not allowed to speak about in public. Something new that offends is outlawed by the PC Police. Erick Erickson, one of America’s most successful fake Conservative Blogging Pundits once said in reference to the Militant Homosexual Agenda, “You will be made to Care”, and in a way, he was absolutely correct.

Where Erick was wrong (man that is a list that could take years to unpack) was, that he was only referring to the Militant Homosexual Agenda. But in truth, it isn’t just the Militant Homosexual Agenda that me, you and everyone else is going to be made to care about. Its the entire Marxist Political Agenda that we are all being forced to care about.

The Militant Homosexual Agenda, like it or not, is one of the most successful of the Marxist Useless Imbecilic programs ever devised. A literal creation of the British Marxist organization, the Fabian Society, it targeted Homosexuals in the usual Marxist fashion, identify a small minority, play of their resentment over being abused and discriminated against by society, and cultivate a militant sect willing to attack the society that discriminated against them for political overthrow. America’s African American community was targeted and manipulated in exactly the same manner.

The list of minority groups that have fallen prey to the Marxist revolutionaries around the world is huge. Each group having a legitimate grip against their society, and each group falling victim to the Marxist rhetoric that amounts to, society will never peacefully include you in society, and the only way to gain acceptance, is to destroy the society that is discriminating against you and recreate it as a new more tolerant and inclusive society.

By stoking the anger and resentment of these minority groups, the Marxist revolutionaries succeeded in convincing these minority groups, that the injustices they suffered were so egregious, so evil, so wrong, that the destruction of their society was not merely justified, but mandatory.

With their anger, fear and resentment enraged, each of those minority groups played right into the Marxist Revolutionaries hands and the grabbed on with both hands to the tactics offered them. The single most prevalent of those tactics is a logic fallacy of the highest order, one so egregious that its wide spread acceptance by these minority groups requires a suspension of disbelief in said individuals capacity for logical or rational cognizant thought.

That logic fallacy? “We will not tolerate intolerance”. The refusal to tolerate intolerance is in of itself, the single most abusive tyrannical and intolerant of positions an individual can take. It is the demand for discrimination and intolerance against all forms of thought not approved by those who themselves are demanding inclusion and tolerance.

Like Roseanne, all Americans are just one bad tweet away from being fired

This wasn’t Barr’s first racist tweet. So why now? The political climate is putting all employers on high alert when it comes to the words and behavior of their employees, Sinnreich says. “We’re understood to be private citizens, but when someone is the public face of a public corporation, that corporation should and must be held accountable for the actions of that individual,” he added.

Sinnreich says some people are frustrated with the lack of consequences when President Trump tweets racially-tinged comments. “Until the president is held accountable for the outrageous volume of hate speech that he generates, proxies are going to continue to come under the gun.” (President Trump has made incendiary remarks about Mexicans, Haitians and Nigerians.)

Many people are plugged into the news cycle all day long. One in five employers think staff is productive fewer than five hours a day, with most citing smartphone use as the culprit, a 2016 CareerBuilder report of hiring managers found.

That does not, however, mean you should share all your opinions on social media. The First Amendment protects free speech, but it may not protect your job if you do or say anything that is contrary to the company’s values, even if it’s a joke. In employment-at-will states, employees without a contract can be fired without cause.

“Twitter is today’s PR Newswire,” says Donna Francavilla, a communications specialist in Birmingham, Ala. “We think we’re talking to our followers and we think they’re all loyal to us and, if we issue an opinion, they’ll agree.” That’s not the case, she said. Often times, many people who follow Trump, for instance, may disagree with his views.

“It never used to be that way,” Francavilla said. “Social media used to be just you and your friends. But we’re now using this new megaphone to express our ideas to a much larger audience.” Anyone with a public Twitter account is a de facto public figure, she added. “We have to be mindful of every word we speak and everything we write.”

Yes, Roseanne said something offensive. That is not the problem. The problem lays with who decides what is offensive and who is allowed to be offensive. At the 2018 White House Correspondents’ Dinner far left liberal “Comedian” Michelle Wolf and a host of other far left liberals spent an entire evening making repugnant and offensive remarks about President Trump and the various members of his Administration.

Their defense for doing so? Trump is evil therefore, saying bad things about him is good. See how this works? Where is the refusal to tolerate intolerance? Where is the refusal to reject discrimination? Where is the insistence on condemning hateful rhetoric? Where? It does not exist, that’s where it is. No tolerance of Intolerance is not and never was about creating a more tolerant and inclusive society.

It has always and always will be a weapon to silence anyone who does not think the correct thoughts or say the correct things. And who is it that determines what those correct ideas and words are? Its always to most militant radical liberal left Marxist elements that make those determinations.

The hypocrisy has about it the rank stench of a rotting corpse. African American Rap Artists who make millions every year including the “N” word in nearly all of their music, no big deal right? Wrong, their music is not consumed by the African American Community alone, it is consumed by every strata of society. Google “why its wrong for white people to say nigga” you’ll find tens of thousands of justifications for a double standard that violates every principal of logic and reason. There are literally millions of young white kids around the world who sing along every day with songs that repeat the word over and over and over.

Enshrined the United States Constitution is the concept of “Freedom of Speech”. It’s not just in the first amendment, the concept runs the entire length and breadth of the Constitution. No where and at no point in the US Constitution will you ever find the concept that you have the right to not be offended by what someone else says or thinks.

Politically Correct Speech is as antithetical to the United States Constitution as it is possible to be. Yet it exists in America to such a degree that Roseanne Barr, a comedian well known for being vulgar and offensive, had her television show canceled and she was fired from her job for something that she said.

Kathy Griffin held up a prop of President Trumps severed head, the entire liberal Marxist community rushed to her defense, Michelle Wolf ranted on for over half an hour at the White House Correspondents’ Dinner saying the most vile and repugnant of things, she also was defended by the Liberal Marxist left. This is Politically Correct Speech, this is No tolerance of Intolerance, this is tyrannical abusive censorship.

It has one purpose and one alone. To enslave everyone to the political ideology of those who wield it, and that political ideology is an abomination and offense to the United States Constitution. Yet, and this is why it exists here in America, as repugnant and disgusting as it is, as offensive to those who cherish the United States Constitution as it is, it is protected by the Constitution of the United States just as every other form of speech is.

Once upon a time in America, we all knew and understood the meaning of the phrase, “I Disapprove of What You Say, But I Will Defend to the Death Your Right to Say It” the phrase, most often attributed to Evelyn Beatrice Hall, who was giving voice to sentiments expressed by the French philosopher François-Marie Arouet, (also known as ) Voltaire was for nearly 200 years the practical working definition of the American First Amendment defending Freedom of Speech.

The problem of course is, that when you have vile repugnant ideas or political ideologies, and you want to overthrow a society with them, the last thing that you want, is a citizenry capable of repudiating your ideological agenda. This is why Politically Correct Speech exists. To empower a group of revolutionaries against the larger society to dictate the rule of engagement in such a manner as to disarm that society so that it cannot resist being overthrown.

So, to once again quote Erick Erickson, “You will be made to Care”. You will be made to censor your every thought and word lest you be subjected to withering public criticism, the loss of your employment and possibly even the loss of your personal freedom. Just ask Not so Great Britain’s Tommy Robinson. Wait… But that’s the UK, that could never happen here, right? Really? What do you think the Obama Administration had youtube movie maker and creator of “The Innocence of Islam” Nakoula Basseley Nakoula arrested and incarcerated for?

This is exactly what Politically Correct Speech is, it is you being made to care.