The Nazi’s were amateurs compared to Planned Murderhood…

In 1944 Dwight D. Eisenhower entered the Nazi forced labor and concentration camp located near Ohrdruf, south of Gotha, in Thuringia, Germany. It was part of the Buchenwald concentration camp network. The things that Eisenhower saw there were enough to leave the war hardened General shaken and week at the knees. The Nazi’s had declared over 12 million peoples designated by the state to not be human beings, just goop as it were. They then proceeded to euthanize those 12 million people in a assembly line industrialized manner the likes of which resulted in the Nazi’s being designated as the most evil organization in human history. Their hair was used to stuff pillows, their skin to make lampshades their gold filling to fund Hitler’s war machine and their bodies, usually while still alive, were handed over to doctors to experiment on.

All across America Conservatives lament that America has been seemingly overcome by degeneracy and corruption. The morals of the nation have been perverted to the point that America’s founding Fathers not only would not recognize the America of 2015, but would probably have surrendered to the British to prevent from happening. Yet these same Conservative were stunned and outraged when in 2001 the Reverends Jerry Fawell and Pat Robertson had the unmitigated gall to suggest that 9/11 might possibly have happened because God had withdrawn his protection from America.

Since 1970’s Roe v Wade, the abortion industry has murdered 55 million individuals. People who were denied their constitutional right to Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness. People who were denied the Constitutional Right to due process under the Law. People who were executed without the benefit of a Grand Jury indictment, charges ever being filed, a conviction secured, not being sentenced and without a single solitary Appeal ever being filed. They were murdered because they were inconvenient, and like the victims of Nazi Germany, designated by the State as not being human beings. Hitler and his staff must be eating their hearts out right now that they did not think to eliminate their Jewish Problem in the same manner. A mere 12 million Murders and Hitler is designated the most evil man in recorded human history, 55 million murders and you get to call yourself the Defenders of Women’s Rights and Health.

Anyone who thinks that God is protecting or blessing any people or nation that murder 55 million of their most vulnerable and innocent citizens has obviously, through a disturbingly profound ignorance, confused Lucifer, that serpent of old, called the Devil and Satan with God. When polled a stunning 83 percent of American consider themselves Christian. Planned Parenthood Murderhood, has put the Nazi Concentration Camps to shame with their efficiency and volume. Given the utterly horrific nature of the evil involved here, one can only conclude that the only reason America has not yet met the same fate as the Nazi’s, is because somewhere within that 83 percent that claim to be Christians and those that actually are Christians there must be just enough of those real Christians sprinkled in to pass the “Lot Test”.

Lot of course being the nephew of Abraham that lived in Sodom. When Abraham was negotiating with God in an attempt to save his nephew, he asked the Angels, would God not spare Sodom if there were 10 righteous men there? Sodom and Gomorrah failed the Lot Test rather profoundly, and the Bible records that they were devastated by fire and brimstone falling from the heavens. Obama has for all practical purposes just given Iran 180 billion dollars and full permission to nuke America. Fire and and brimstone falling from the heavens, a nuclear device on a ballistic missile descending along its trajectory from outer-space, meh, perhaps some of you will notice the similarity.

There are 55 million of God’s most precious Children standing before him asking him, “How long Oh God before you avenge us?”.

The Book of Jonah tells of one of Jonah’s campaigns in Nineveh, in this specific example Jonah delivers God’s message, and the people of Nineveh actually repent. A fact which pisses Jonah off rather seriously. He had his sights set on a full on fireworks display, even found himself a great spot outside the city from which to watch the spectacle. By all accounts the people of Nineveh were worshiping the god Moloch. Their worship included a ritual where the first born child was taken straight from the mothers womb to one of Moloch’s temples, where the newborn child was placed on a large bronze statue of Moloch whose outstretched arms and cupped hands descended to just above a roaring fire. The newborn baby would slide down the outstretched arms right into the waiting open hands of Moloch, where it would be burned alive.

Nineveh repented, and God canceled the fast approaching fireworks. The fireworks are fast approaching America, and I can’t help but wonder if God is still counting to see whether America passes the “Lot Test” or not. As there was with Nineveh, their might still be time for America to repent just in case it doesn’t pass the Lot Test, or perhaps its inability to pass the Lot Test means there just aren’t enough people who would even be willing to be saved for America to be able to repent.

How to predict the Future.

In the United States of America in 2015, the only thing more corrupt than the Government, is the Mainstream Media. The Media enjoys a special class of protection under the Bill of Rights First Amendment. It was placed there for the specific intention of allowing the Media to be a watchdog over Government corruption. The belief was that an independent Media would expose government corruption thus allowing the American people the ability to take corrective action against said corruption.

Tragically, at some point in the previous century the Media abdicated that role in favor of an activist political role. They began at first to covertly violate one of Journalism’s most sacred laws, “Report the Story, do not become part of the Story”. After Hunter S Thompson so called invention of gonzo Journalism they even abandoned the pretense of the aforesaid law, and began actively and openly projecting their own ideology into each story they produced. In America of 2015, the new law is Agenda Driven Propaganda, not Objective reporting.

This can clearly be seem in literally hundreds of examples ranging from, “File this under: Admitting that they knowingly and willfully lie”. Where the Washington Post openly brags that they knowingly and willfully lie to their readers to advance various political agenda’s to “New York Times Stealth-Edits Clinton Email Story at Her Command Where the New York times changes what they report while trying to conceal those changes from their readers.

The consequences of this change in the American Mainstream Media is far greater than just the advancement of the far left Liberal Media’s agenda, it impacts the Federal Government by creating an environment where political agenda driven corruption is rewarded rather than being prosecuted as it should be. The problem is, that rewarding political agenda driven corruption never ever stops at mere political agenda driven corruption, it opens a door to the widespread and systemic adoption of corruption as a normal aspect of governmental operational procedure.

In short, it becomes the standard operating procedure.

Two Inspectors General at the State Department have requested that the Department of Justice open a criminal probe into Hillary Clinton’s use of a private e-mail server after finding reason to believe it was used for transmitting “hundreds of potentially classified e-mails. On the face of it, this sounds like the Government doing exactly what Federal Law requires. The fact that these two Inspectors Generals are even making this request however, tells your straight away just how far down the systemic corruption rabbit-hole we have already fallen.

In an America where the Department of Justice were not a corrupt political tool of the office of the POTUS, upon the public revelation that Hillary Clinton had maintained a private email server through which ANY State Department email traffic was traveled, the Department of Justice would have automatically instigated a criminal investigation. Moreover, upon discovering that Hillary Clinton had destroyed the contents of that server, the DOJ would have instigated Criminal proceeding for the destruction of Federal Government Property without proper authorization and destruction of evidence of Criminal Activity.

Predicting the Future here is painfully easy. It involves, what should have been done and was not, and why it might be done now. The why, is the easiest part, indemnification of Hillary Clinton against Double Jeopardy. In short, the most abjective and abusive form of political agenda driven corruption imaginable.

The what then automatically predicts itself. The Department of InJustice has declared that it has investigated whether Hillary Clinton committed any criminal activities with regard to her use of a legally prohibited private email server, and found no evidence of criminal activity. There it is, as simple as that, the Fox investigated his Sister with regard to accusations that she was eating the Chickens in Farmer Browns Chicken-coop, and found no evidence that she was responsible, despite the obvious evidence of blood and feathers all around her mouth.

Chief Justice of the Supreme Court Benedict Arnold.

Irony can be found at its finest when an individual displays their hypocrisy with a complete and total lack of self awareness of their hypocrisy.

But this Court is not a legislature. Whether same-sex marriage is a good idea should be of no concern to us. Under the Constitution, judges have power to say what the law is, not what it should be. The people who ratified the Constitution authorized courts to exercise “neither force nor will but merely judgment.”

Chief Justice of the Supreme Court Benedict Arnold.

Compare and contrast that with.

Here, the statutory scheme compels us to reject petitioners’ interpretation because it would destabilize the individual insurance market in any State with a Federal Exchange, and likely create the very “death spirals” that Congress designed the Act to avoid.

Chief Justice of the Supreme Court Benedict Arnold.

Two decisions render by the same hypocrite one single day apart.

Associate Justice Antonin Scalia delivered what is perhaps one of the most scathing rebuttals in Supreme Court history in his dissent.

Justice Antonin Scalia is known for his sharp wit and even sharper pen. He pulled no punches in his dissent today from the Supreme Court’s decision in King v. Burwell allowing the Obama administration to allow Obamacare subsidies to flow through the federal exchange.
Here are nine highlights:

1. “We should start calling this law SCOTUScare … [T]his Court’s two decisions on the Act will surely be remembered through the years … And the cases will publish forever the discouraging truth that the Supreme Court of the United States favors some laws over others, and is prepared to do whatever it takes to uphold and assist its favorites.”

2. “This case requires us to decide whether someone who buys insurance on an Exchange established by the Secretary gets tax credits. You would think the answer would be obvious—so obvious there would hardly be a need for the Supreme Court to hear a case about it.”

3. “Words no longer have meaning if an Exchange that is not established by a State is ‘established by the State.’”

4. “Under all the usual rules of interpretation, in short, the Government should lose this case. But normal rules of interpretation seem always to yield to the overriding principle of the present Court: The Affordable Care Act must be saved.”

5. “The Court interprets §36B to award tax credits on both federal and state Exchanges. It accepts that the ‘most natural sense’ of the phrase ‘Exchange established by the State’ is an Exchange established by a State. (Understatement, thy name is an opinion on the Affordable Care Act!) Yet the opinion continues, with no semblance of shame, that ‘it is also possible that the phrase refers to all Exchanges—both State and Federal. (Impossible possibility, thy name is an opinion on the Affordable Care Act!)’”

6. “Perhaps sensing the dismal failure of its efforts to show that ‘established by the State’ means ‘established by the State or the Federal Government,’ the Court tries to palm off the pertinent statutory phrase as “inartful drafting.’ This Court, however, has no free-floating power ‘to rescue Congress from its drafting errors.’”

7. “The Court’s decision reflects the philosophy that judges should endure whatever interpretive distortions it takes in order to correct a supposed flaw in the statutory machinery. That philosophy ignores the American people’s decision to give Congress ‘[a]ll legislative Powers’ enumerated in the Constitution. They made Congress, not this Court, responsible for both making laws and mending them.”

8. “More importantly, the Court forgets that ours is a government of laws and not of men. That means we are governed by the terms of our laws, not by the unenacted will of our lawmakers. ‘If Congress enacted into law something different from what it intended, then it should amend the statute to conform to its intent.’ In the meantime, this Court ‘has no roving license … to disregard clear language simply on the view that … Congress ‘must have intended’ something broader.”

9. “Rather than rewriting the law under the pretense of interpreting it, the Court should have left it to Congress to decide what to do about the Act’s limitation of tax credits to state Exchanges.”

Not since March 6, 1857 when a 7–2 decision written by Chief Justice Roger B. Taney, has the Supreme Court of the United States rendered a decision that was so profoundly and obviously flawed. Chief Justice John Robert’s, aka Chief Justice Benedict Arnold is destined to go down in history as one of if not the only Supreme court Chief Justice to garner a greater degree of disgust. To say that the current Chief Justice has disgraced himself and generations of the Supreme court to come is in fact a monumental understatement.

King v Burwell is the Dred Scott of our generation, and even more disgraceful than the original Dred Scott because hief Justice Roger B. Taney the luxury of history to inform him of how disgraceful such a decision was.

EDIT:  The Schadenfreude it burns, it burns…

Chief Justice John Roberts not only dissented from the Court’s ruling but also read a summary of his dissent from the bench.  It was the first time that he has done so in his ten Terms on the Court, and it signaled how strongly he disagreed with the Court’s ruling.  Roberts forcefully criticized the majority for side-stepping the democratic process and declaring that same-sex couples have the right to marry when, in his view, such a right “has no basis in the Constitution.”  The Court’s decision, he complained, “orders the transformation of a social institution that has formed the basis of human society for millennia, for the Kalahari Bushmen and the Han Chinese, the Carthaginians and the Aztecs.”  “Just who,” Roberts laments, “do we think we are?”  The other three Justices echoed Roberts’s sentiments, sometimes in even more strident terms:  Justice Antonin Scalia characterized the decision as a “judicial Putsch” and suggested that, before he signed on to an opinion like the majority’s, “I would hide my head in a bag.”

Is Glenn Beck about to reveal the biggest political and legal scandal in US History?

Radio rodeo clown Glenn Beck is threatening, or promising, depending on what you think of Glenn Beck, to blow the American political power structure to smithereens. He is claiming that a whistle blower has provided him with an incredibly damaging document. A document that according to Beck proves that the Obama Administration used blackmail to influence Chief Justice John Roberts in his decision regarding Obamacare.

Beck is threatening, or promising that he will revel the contents of and the document within the next 24 hours.

Glenn Beck threatens reveal that will take down “the whole power structure”


At the top of his radio broadcast today,Glenn Beck promised that, within the next twenty four hours, hisThe Blaze network will break a story that is going to rock the nation and take down the entire power structure.

Beck refused to elaborate, except to say that an anonymous whistle-blower, whom Beck claims is refusing to come forward out of fear of being killed, had provided him with a one-page document. Beck claimed, however, that “this one document would take down pretty much the whole power structure, pretty much everything.”

I’ve heard Glenn Beck make some outrageous claims in the past that well, amounted to pretty much nothing. Will this be another of Glenn’s infamous “Opening Al Capone’s Vault” moments?

I guess we’ll all just have to stay tuned to find out, though, personally I doubt Beck has what he claims he does.

‘In this instance,

With these infamous words Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States John Roberts crucifies the rule of law in the United States of America.

‘In this instance, the context and structure of the Act compel us to depart from what would otherwise be the most natural reading of the pertinent statutory phrase’…

Perhaps someone should be asking the Chinese or Wikileaks, exactly what is it that the Obamanation Administration has on Roberts that they are applying so effectively as blackmail.