An American Conservative view on the role and size of Government.

From America’s Founding Fathers on to today, the American Conservative believes and always has believed that government was a necessary evil. One which required the Sword of Damocles always be hovering just above its head. The quote “The best government is that which governs least.” can be traced as far back as the 1839 issue of The United States Magazine and Democratic Review. America’s Founding Fathers were inherently distrustful of government to such a degree that when crafting the United States Constitution, it was the government itself rather than the citizens that they places the most restrictions on.

Even the most cursory reading of the United States Constitution exposes this fact. In every single Article and clause, in every single Amendment the single most striking aspect, is the limitation placed on the government. Here you will go, and no further.

Section 9.

The migration or importation of such persons as any of the states now existing shall think proper to admit, shall not be prohibited by the Congress prior to the year one thousand eight hundred and eight, but a tax or duty may be imposed on such importation, not exceeding ten dollars for each person.

The privilege of the writ of habeas corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in cases of rebellion or invasion the public safety may require it.

No bill of attainder or ex post facto Law shall be passed.

No capitation, or other direct, tax shall be laid, unless in proportion to the census or enumeration herein before directed to be taken.

No tax or duty shall be laid on articles exported from any state.

No preference shall be given by any regulation of commerce or revenue to the ports of one state over those of another: nor shall vessels bound to, or from, one state, be obliged to enter, clear or pay duties in another.

No money shall be drawn from the treasury, but in consequence of appropriations made by law; and a regular statement and account of receipts and expenditures of all public money shall be published from time to time.

No title of nobility shall be granted by the United States: and no person holding any office of profit or trust under them, shall, without the consent of the Congress, accept of any present, emolument, office, or title, of any kind whatever, from any king, prince, or foreign state.
Section 10.

No state shall enter into any treaty, alliance, or confederation; grant letters of marque and reprisal; coin money; emit bills of credit; make anything but gold and silver coin a tender in payment of debts; pass any bill of attainder, ex post facto law, or law impairing the obligation of contracts, or grant any title of nobility.

No state shall, without the consent of the Congress, lay any imposts or duties on imports or exports, except what may be absolutely necessary for executing it’s inspection laws: and the net produce of all duties and imposts, laid by any state on imports or exports, shall be for the use of the treasury of the United States; and all such laws shall be subject to the revision and control of the Congress.

No state shall, without the consent of Congress, lay any duty of tonnage, keep troops, or ships of war in time of peace, enter into any agreement or compact with another state, or with a foreign power, or engage in war, unless actually invaded, or in such imminent danger as will not admit of delay.

Congress shall make no law, shall not be infringed, No Soldier shall, The right of the people.

Thomas Jefferson even went to far as to make this prescription for keeping a tight reign on the government.

“I do not know whether it is to yourself or Mr. Adams I am to give my thanks for the copy of the new constitution. I beg leave through you to place them where due. It will be yet three weeks before I shall receive them from America. There are very good articles in it: and very bad. I do not know which preponderate. What we have lately read in the history of Holland, in the chapter on the Stadtholder, would have sufficed to set me against a Chief magistrate eligible for a long duration, if I had ever been disposed towards one: and what we have always read of the elections of Polish kings should have forever excluded the idea of one continuable for life. Wonderful is the effect of impudent and persevering lying. The British ministry have so long hired their gazetteers to repeat and model into every form lies about our being in anarchy, that the world has at length believed them, the English nation has believed them, the ministers themselves have come to believe them, and what is more wonderful, we have believed them ourselves. Yet where does this anarchy exist? Where did it ever exist, except in the single instance of Massachusets? And can history produce an instance of a rebellion so honourably conducted? I say nothing of it’s motives. They were founded in ignorance, not wickedness. God forbid we should ever be 20. years without such a rebellion.[1] The people can not be all, and always, well informed. The part which is wrong will be discontented in proportion to the importance of the facts they misconceive. If they remain quiet under such misconceptions it is a lethargy, the forerunner of death to the public liberty. We have had 13. states independant 11. years. There has been one rebellion. That comes to one rebellion in a century and a half for each state. What country ever existed a century and a half without a rebellion? And what country can preserve it’s liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance? Let them take arms. The remedy is to set them right as to facts, pardon and pacify them. What signify a few lives lost in a century or two? The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants. It is it’s natural manure. Our Convention has been too much impressed by the insurrection of Massachusets: and in the spur of the moment they are setting up a kite to keep the hen yard in order. I hope in god this article will be rectified before the new constitution is accepted.” – Thomas Jefferson to William Stephens Smith, Paris, 13 Nov. 1787[2]

What the Founding Father’s knew, and attempted to the best of their ability to guard against, was the tyranny of a government which had slipped its legal, moral and ethical constraints and amassed to itself the power and authority to disregard the will of the governed. The Christian apologist and writer CS Lewis saw just as clearly what the form of such an America tyranny would take.

“Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron’s cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience. They may be more likely to go to Heaven yet at the same time likelier to make a Hell of earth. This very kindness stings with intolerable insult. To be “cured” against one’s will and cured of states which we may not regard as disease is to be put on a level of those who have not yet reached the age of reason or those who never will; to be classed with infants, imbeciles, and domestic animals.”

― C.S. Lewis, God in the Dock: Essays on Theology (Making of Modern Theology)

And indeed, here were are in America in 2017. Living under the oppressive tyranny of George Orwell and CS Lewis’s predictions. Living in an America that would have appalled and offended America’s Founding Father’s.

Situational Assessment 2017: Trump Edition

In 2015, I took a swing at assessing the shape and state of our global challenges. Looking back, that essay is still well worth a read, but it is high time for an update.

While many things have changed in the world in the past two years, 2016 saw what looks like a phase transition in the political domain. While the overall phenomenon is global in scale and includes Brexit and other movements throughout Europe, I want to focus specifically on the victory of the “Trump Insurgency” and drill down into detail on how this state change will play out.

I use John Robb’s term “Trump Insurgency” here to highlight the fact that the election of 2016 was not an example of “ordinary politics”. Anyone who fails to understand this is going to be making significant errors. For example, the 2016 election is not comparable to the 2000 election (e.g., merely a “close” election) nor to the 1980 election (e.g., an “ideological transition” election). While it is tempting to compare it to 1860, I’m not sure that is a good match either.

In fact, as I go back and try to do pattern matching, the only real pattern I can find is the 1776 “election” (AKA the American Revolution). In other words, while 2016 still formally looked like politics, what is really going on here is a revolutionary war. For now this is war using memes rather than bullets, but war is much more than a metaphor.

This war is about much more than ideology, money or power. Even the participants likely do not fully understand the stakes. At a deep level, we are right in the middle of an existential conflict between two entirely different and incompatible ways of forming “collective intelligence”. This is a deep point and will likely be confusing. So I’m going to take it slow and below will walk through a series of “fronts” of the war that I see playing out over the next several years. This is a pretty tactical assessment and should make sense and be useful to anyone. I’ll get to the deep point last — and will be going way out there in an effort to grasp “what is really going on”. I’ll definitely miss wildly, but with any luck, the total journey will be worth the time.

Thomas Jefferson’s prescription indeed.

The role of the government as envision by America’s Founding Father’s, was to protect the rights and liberties of American citizens. That role, as codified by the United States Constitution was, and even to this very day, still makes the United States Constitution the single most revolutionary document ever written. The United States Government was never intended, nor even legally allowed to intrude into every aspect of American citizens lives and dictate which moral or ethical ideologies those citizens must prescribe to.

It was never intended that the government gain control over every public or private affair of America’s citizens. It was never intended to grow so large and powerful that it could ignore the will of the governed. Its role is, and must return to that of protecting, not limiting or controlling the rights and liberties of American citizens. Its size needs to be reduced to the point where its legitimate role cannot be supplanted by the sheer mass of bureaucratic volume.


7 thoughts on “An American Conservative view on the role and size of Government.

  1. Whoa, I really have missed alot! No computer, but got a clue that I could use my phone for more than talk and text. D”oh, I might be too dim for a responce.

    Do you know how CXI is doing and Did he ever start his web page again? Always appreciated his thoughts

    • I appreciate that. I would request though, that you be careful over at SR. I do not want any of you getting into trouble on my account. Fossten is not a kind or benevolent ruler, he is petty childish and dishonest. What happened with CXI and how he swept it under the carpet should tell you all you need to know about him. I do not want anyone losing their privileges there because of my conflict with him. I respect the community there and harbor no ill will towards it. And yes, I miss my friends there.

      • “Fossten is not a kind or benevolent ruler, he is petty childish and dishonest.”

        Noticed that, did you. He is a man with a huge ego encased in very thin skin.

        Oops. I’d better quit talking about him; he might ban me.

        It is ironic though. He came to my defense at HotAir against the same kind of actions. I hold no grudges–although, true to my nature, I’m not above at giving a dig or two.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s