Dianne Feinstein wants to violate the US Constitution. Yea, real shocker…

Dianne Feinstein wants to violate the US Constitution. Yea, real shocker…

New legislation proposed by California Senator Dianne Feinstein (D) in response to the Sandy Hook shootings in Newtown, Connecticut, will provide a much more comprehensive approach to assault weapons control than the original Federal Assault Weapons ban of 1994, reports the New York Times. But what are the specifics of the senator’s proposed regulations?

The Feinstein bill will:

– Ban the sale, transfer, importation or manufacturing of 120 specifically named firearms, as well as other guns which can accept detachable magazines and have one or more “military” characteristics.

– Ban the sale, transfer, importation or manufacturing of semiautomatic weapons with fixed magazines of more than 10 rounds.

– Strengthens the 1994 Assault Weapons Ban by moving from a 2-characteristic test to a 1-characteristic test. Detachable bayonet mounts and flash suppressors are no longer considered military characteristics.

– Bans firearms with “thumbhole stocks” and “bullet buttons.” Thumbhole stocks are ergonomic modifications which make weapons easier to aim, while bullet buttons increase the speed of ejecting a spent magazine.

– Bans ammunition feeding mechanisms which can store more than 10 rounds.

– Protects the rights of existing gun owners by grandfathering in weapons legally possessed on the date of enactment, as well as exempting 900 specifically named weapons and antique, manually-operated, or permanently disabled weapons.

– Requires registration of grandfathered weapons under the National Firearms Act, which necessitates a background check, registration of type and serial number, positive identification, certification that registered guns are legal under state or local law.

– Dedicates funding to the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms to enforce the above laws.

Dianne Feinstein, like all good troglodytes and Marxist aristocrats doesn’t give a damned about her sworn oath to defend and protect the Constitution of the United States of America. The same Dianne Feinstein who doesn’t give a damned about any law that gets between her and defrauding the American Tax payer. The same Dianne Feinstein who illegally funneled BILLIONS AND BILLIONS of dollars to her husbands company over the course of her tenure in the Senate.

Feinstein routes government money to firm doing business with husband

The Washington Times reports that Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) took unusual steps to route government funding to an agency that usually works from a separate stream of revenue just after the agency awarded her husband’s firm a lucrative contract. The FDIC gave Richard Blum’s firm, property management firm CB Richard Ellis, contracts to handle residential foreclosures at a higher rate than normal market price, even though CBRE had less experience in that market than other competing firms. And Feinstein got the FDIC the money even though she has no connection to the Senate Banking Committee, the body that normally deals with the FDIC:

On the day the new Congress convened this year, Sen. Dianne Feinstein introduced legislation to route $25 billion in taxpayer money to a government agency that had just awarded her husband’s real estate firm a lucrative contract to sell foreclosed properties at compensation rates higher than the industry norms.

Mrs. Feinstein’s intervention on behalf of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. was unusual: the California Democrat isn’t a member of the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs with jurisdiction over FDIC; and the agency is supposed to operate from money it raises from bank-paid insurance payments – not direct federal dollars.

Documents reviewed by The Washington Times show Mrs. Feinstein first offered Oct. 30 to help the FDIC secure money for its effort to stem the rise of home foreclosures. Her letter was sent just days before the agency determined that CB Richard Ellis Group (CBRE) – the commercial real estate firm that her husband Richard Blum heads as board chairman – had won the competitive bidding for a contract to sell foreclosed properties that FDIC had inherited from failed banks.

About the same time of the contract award, Mr. Blum’s private investment firm reported to the Securities and Exchange Commission that it and related affiliates had purchased more than 10 million new shares in CBRE. The shares were purchased for the going price of $3.77; CBRE’s stock closed Monday at $5.14.

The same utterly corrupt Dianne Feinstein who if she were not a Senator, protected by the billions and billions of dollars she stole from the American tax payer would be sharing a prison cell with Rand “Duke” Cunningham is now attempting to nullify the 2nd amendment to the United States constitution. No, I will not ask where is her shame, she is a sociopath and has absolutely no shame what so ever. Only the willingness to lie and steal at every turn.

On the other hand, it can also be said quite honestly, that this very same Dianne Feinstein is the perfect model of Democrat Marxist ethic and morals. Or, perhaps more accurately be said that she is the perfect model of Democrat Marxist complete and total lack of morals and ethics. Like her Democrat Marxist cohorts, her only moral or ethical values can be summed up in one simple phrase. The End justifies the Means.

The United States Constitution is about as crystal clear on the subject of firearms ownership as it possible could be. The Founding Fathers made the reasons behind the inclusion of the 2nd amendment as clear as they possibly could.

Shall not be infringed.

in·fringe // //
v. in·fringed, in·fring·ing, in·fring·es

v. tr.

To transgress or exceed the limits of; violate: infringe a contract; infringe a patent.
Obsolete To defeat; invalidate.

v. intr.
To encroach on someone or something; engage in trespassing: an increased workload that infringed on his personal life.

[Latin īnfringere, to destroy : in-, intensive pref.; see in-2 + frangere, to break; see bhreg- in Indo-European roots.]
in·fring’er n.

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

The progressive movement has been eroding this amendment since early on in the 20th century. Hiding their actions behind such vile and detestable terms as reasonable regulations and public safety.

The real truth is that the founding fathers left zero wiggle room regarding the regulation of firearms ownership. They made their thoughts on the subject absolutely crystal clear.

Benjamin Franklin: Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary
safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety.” (Nov 11 1755, from the Pennsylvania Assembly’s reply to
the Governor of Pennsylvania.)

Thomas Jefferson: “Laws that forbid the carrying of arms…disarm only those who are neither
inclined or determined to commit crimes. Such laws only make things worse for the assaulted and
better for the assassins; they serve to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man
may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man.” (1764 Letter and speech from T.
Jefferson quoting with approval an essay by Cesare Beccari)

John Adams: “Arms in the hands of citizens may be used at individual discretion in private self
defense.” (A defense of the Constitution of the US)

George Washington: “Firearms stand next in importance to the Constitution itself. They are the
people’s liberty teeth (and) keystone… the rifle and the pistol are equally indispensable… more than
99% of them [guns] by their silence indicate that they are in safe and sane hands. The very
atmosphere of firearms everywhere restrains evil interference [crime]. When firearms go, all goes,
we need them every hour.” (Address to 1st session of Congress)

George Mason: “To disarm the people is the most effectual way to enslave them.” (3 Elliot,
Debates at 380)

Noah Webster: “Before a standing army can rule, the people must be disarmed, as they are in
almost every country in Europe.” (1787, Pamphlets on the Constitution of the US)

George Washington: “A free people ought to be armed.” (Jan 14 1790, Boston Independent

Thomas Jefferson: “No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms.” (T. Jefferson papers,
334, C.J. Boyd, Ed. 1950)

James Madison: “Americans have the right and advantage of being armed, unlike the people of
other countries, whose people are afraid to trust them with arms.” (Federalist Paper #46)

History had to be revised by a progressive controlled educational system for these facts to be so ignored and watered down as to advance the notion the founding fathers found both insane and insulting, reasonable regulation and public safety.

Thomas Jefferson perhaps said it best.

Thomas Jefferson: “Laws that forbid the carrying of arms…disarm only those who are neither
inclined or determined to commit crimes. Such laws only make things worse for the assaulted and
better for the assassins; they serve to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man
may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man.” (1764 Letter and speech from T.
Jefferson quoting with approval an essay by Cesare Beccari)

The second amendment is not a States Rights issue, nor does the Federal Government have any constitutional authority to regulate firearms ownership, the constitution makes this indisputably and incontrovertibly clear.

Yet Federal administration after administration and State after State have completely and totally violated the letter of the law as spelled out in no uncertain terms in the Second Amendment to the US Constitution.

Furthermore, the FBI has documented and for the most part hidden their results which prove beyond any doubt that populated centers where individual gun ownership and right to carry laws exist have the very lowest assault, murder, and robbery levels in the entire country.

Federal and State gun regulations are not and never has been about providing public safety, they are and always have been about making stripping the constitutional rights away from citizens and increasing the governments control over individuals lives.

Ponder the words of the great and famous statesman Benjamin Franklin, consider where you fall in this great divide, are you on the side of the Founding Fathers of this Great Republic, or have you sided with the Progressive Movement, (and yes that really does mean communists) who are attempting to subvert the US Constitution?

Benjamin Franklin: Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary
safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety.” (Nov 11 1755, from the Pennsylvania Assembly’s reply to
the Governor of Pennsylvania.)

Choose you this day upon whose side you are on, I pray that the words of Sameul Adams are not spoken of you.
Sameul Adams:“If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquillity of servitude than the animating contest of freedom, — go from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains sit lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen!”

Webster Dictionary defines the word Infringe as;

verb \in-ˈfrinj\
Definition of INFRINGE
transitive verb
: to encroach upon in a way that violates law or the rights of another
obsolete : defeat, frustrate
intransitive verb
: encroach —used with on or upon
— in·fring·er noun
See infringe defined for English-language learners »
See infringe defined for kids »
Examples of INFRINGE

They claim that his use of the name infringes their copyright.
Her rights must not be infringed.

Origin of INFRINGE
Medieval Latin infringere, from Latin, to break, crush, from in- + frangere to break — more at break
First Known Use: 1513

One cannot read the 2nd amendment and in any sense of the word “honestly” come to any other conclusion that ANY law that places ANY restriction on ANY free citizen is a unconstitutional law and a blatant violation of the United States Constitution. A simple straight forward reading of the 2nd amendment makes it indisputably clear that there is no room what-so-ever in the United States Constitution for ANY “Reasonable” gun restriction.

The problem incontrovertibly is not with guns or gun ownership, it is 100 percent with those who find the United States Constitution to be inconvenient or an obstacle to their own agenda. The founding Father did not put the 2nd amendment in the US Constitution to facilitate sporting or hunting. They put it there specifically for the purpose of giving the Citizens of the United States the ability and right to prevent the Government of the United States from becoming a tyranny and ignoring the will and rights of American Citizens.

Corrupt and criminal politicians like Dianne Feinstein don’t give a damned about the US Constitution because it just gets in their way. They ignore it and violate it with impunity because over the last 100 years they, via the proxies of local state and federal law enforcement have obtained a Monopoly on Violence.

America is witnessing the Rise of The Praetorian Class: These are the corrupt criminal political classes mafia enforcers.

Legions and Lictors – the Praetorian Class

The Praetorian Class includes members of the Armed Services, federal, state and local law enforcement personnel as well as numerous militarized officials including agents from the DEA, Immigrations, Customs Enforcement, Air Marshalls, US Marshalls, and more. It also includes, although to a lesser extent, various stage actors in the expanding security theater such as TSA personnel. The main mission of the Praetorian Class is to keep the order of the day. This requires displaying an intimidating presence in their interactions with the Economic Class.

As the Praetorian Class ascends, the clear, albeit unstated, message that emerges is that actions and events in the Economic Class only occur with its tacit consent. Whether driving on roads, traveling in the air, visiting public land, walking down the street or even living in your own home, every action you take is predicated on its permission. By preconditioning the populace to enforcement of its edicts, most of which are completely arbitrary, the Praetorian Class sets itself up for a high degree of autonomy in its actions. This is confirmed by the fact that consequences for malfeasance within the Praetorian Class are almost never observed, and when it happens, it typically becomes a grotesque spectacle in which one of their own is sacrificed as an example, so as to keep appearances of effective internal controls.

Members of the Praetorian Class are typically recruited from the Economic Class and usually from the lower socio-economic spectrum, which offers them an opportunity for personal and professional gain that otherwise might be out of their reach. Early on in the training and indoctrination process, a strong emphasis is placed on teamwork and advancing the welfare of the team above the individual. While independent thought is never overtly discouraged, the fact is that questioning authority and failing to display complete loyalty to the team results in censure, shunning and even expulsion. Naturally, the recruit learns in short order which behavior is rewarded and responds accordingly. This forges a lifelong, unbreakable bond between the brothers-in-arms. This bond can be observed when people proudly display unit insignia and decorations decades after their departure from service.

As they serve in their martial role, members of the Praetorian Class learn to despise members of the Political Class and to view the plight of the Economic Class with detachment or even contempt. Law enforcement and military personnel will converse behind closed doors about the most horrific injustices and brutalities with cavalier amusement. While perhaps natural, their training for violence and teamwork is a fundamental cause for why members of the Praetorian Class abandon their roots and in time come to view their peers “back on the farm” with contempt. Likewise, the steady displays of the craven and treacherous character of the Political Class causes the Praetorian Class to privately disavow emotional allegiance to their masters, usually early in their service.

Naturally, as the members of the Praetorian Class socially distance themselves from both their origins and their masters, even though they are paid to do their bidding, a new group identity among them emerges. Adoption of this group identity, forged by the training, indoctrination and work, defines membership in the Praetorian Class. Some of the characteristics of this identity include:

Viewing everything and everyone according to a perceived threat posture. The members’ thought processes, beliefs and actions center on viewing the world through a paradigm of a graduated conflict spectrum and how to posture themselves accordingly. Even in the most mundane settings, their conversations tend to be awkward if not centered on their martial duties.

Tight internal socialization. Because they view life through a martial paradigm, members tend to socialize almost exclusively amongst themselves. Immediate family members are expected to do the same, which naturally occurs anyway as they can share experiences that external relationships simply are unable to address.

Loyalty is the highest honor. Whether referred to as the blue wall of silence or the brotherhood in arms, even the most egregious transgressions are buried. If the misdeeds are internal, meaning member versus member, the justice is handled internally. On the other hand, external missteps are typically swept under the rug and significant chicane is experienced by outsiders who seek to learn the truth.

In a relatively free and peaceful society, members of the communities that form the Praetorian Class lead a discrete existence. Members of the military commute to and from their place of work and are largely invisible to both the Political and Economic Class, certainly in communities that are not “Praetorian” communities. Attendance at cultural events in uniform is frowned upon, if not explicitly forbidden. During these times, members of the military and law enforcement are expected to live and operate outside the perception of other members of society, their purpose and function regarded with a sense of detachment and perhaps even subtle curiosity.

As the Political Class increasingly calls upon the Praetorian Class to ensure their order, however, their martial nature becomes more visible in the fabric of day-to-day life. This serves several purposes. For one, it allows the Political Class to demonstrate its willingness to use unlimited force to achieve its objectives, something that was always the case but is now made publicly visible. Rationalizing the increased public profile, a stream of honorifics is bestowed upon the Praetorian Class so that they may be presented as defenders of the Economic Class. This is accomplished through the time-tested use of pageantry, pomp and circumstance.

Over time, additional perquisites are bestowed upon the Praetorian Class including preferential treatment in both private and public facilities. Preferred air travel accommodations for uniformed personnel, including dedicated lines at TSA checkpoints and preferential boarding, have recently emerged as cultural standards that further distance the Praetorian Class from the masses.

If the corrupt politicians like Dianne Feinstein and Barack Obama get their way, America will follow in the footsteps of Adolph Hitlers Germany, Joesph Stalin’s Russia and Mao Tsu dung’s China. It is a well trod path, a path that has resulted in the deaths of more innocent human being than all the wars in History, over 250 million innocent lives lost to this insane ideology in just the last 100 years.

This evil vile and disgusting ideology that Dianne Feinstein and Barack Obama have embraced with all of their heart their mind and their soul? The End Justifies the Means.

The greatest evil ever invented.

The end justifies the means; this is the liberal left in America’s new ideology. Do what ever it takes to win and correct any social injustices afterwards. With this as their guiding ideological and philosophical mantra America’s liberal left has launched a new assault on American politics.

Within this frame work lays the Politics of personal destruction, enter Sarah Palin. A wife, a mother, a Christian and the Former Governor of the State of Alaska and the most public example of the politics of personal destruction ever seen on the stage of American politics.

There was no insult, slur or denigrating comment so vile or reprehensible that the win at any cost, ends justify the means crowd were not gleeful to throw at her. She represented a threat to their agenda that had to be neutralized at any cost. Any cost included truthfulness, decency morality and ethics. Every single one sacrificed at the alter of winning.

What the win at any cost, ends justify the means crowd don’t know or don’t care about is the historical record of their ideological and philosophical mantra. This ideological and philosophical mantra is not new, it did not originate with their unspoken intellectual guru Saul Alinsky.

It’s as old as human civilization and every single place and time it has been accepted and employed it has resulted in the most ruthless totalitarian societies conceivable. There is no act of depravity or injustice that cannot and has not been justified by those subscribing to this ideology.

Stanley Milgram did an experiment in the 1960’s that showed that the average human would engage in inhuman behavior towards innocent individuals if they believed that a sufficient authority figure had ordered them to. This observation is at the root of the Ends justify them means ideology.

It is why the Hitler’s and Stalin’s and Pol Pots of history were able to use the ends as a justification for the utterly unacceptable violence and dehumanization of their fellow human beings in the name of creating great societies.

Where the most ruthless violent totalitarian dictators went before us is exactly where we will go if this evil ideology is allowed to continue unchecked. The notion that it could not happen here in America is a child’s fantasy at best and a pathetic excuses for allowing evil to happen without taking action.

Fortunately for us the only thing required to end group think, is dissenting public opinions. If we sit by silently shaking our heads in disgust at the tactics of the left their group think will grow louder and stronger, if we give voice to opposing views the crowd will shake of the hypnotic effects of group think and begin to act as individuals again.

To defeat the liberal left we must expose their ideological agenda and publicly denounce it for the evil that it is. This does not mean that Saul Alinsky’s rules for Radicals is off limits to the right, but it means that we must establish limits to what is acceptable and what is not and we must rigorously adhere to those limits.

It cant happen in America, like hell it cant, it is happening and the only thing that is going to stop it and reverse the tide is when moral and ethical people of conviction take a public stand and make it incontrovertible that those tactics are vile evil and totally unacceptable in America.

So yes, over the fiscal cliff and let it burn. Let the fools who voted for Obama, let the fools who compromised with Obama let the fools who stayed at home and did not oppose Obama, let the fools who voted third party feel the consequences of their action.

The question now is, will you be one of the fools who allows Dianne Feinstein to violate your constitutional rights, to take away your scary assault weapon, to make you defenseless against a tyrannical oppressive fascist government that the Founding Fathers would be raising an army to overthrow?


4 thoughts on “Dianne Feinstein wants to violate the US Constitution. Yea, real shocker…

  1. You folks have to start looking at this Positively, No we know shit may change color , but it always stinks.

    Thinking Positively, I am finally going to get all the weapons of my Dreams,

    Full auto , select Fire, Claymores , Grenades, and Ad finitum.
    Let me see how they can take them away, or better yet
    To keep and Bear Arms.

    All kinds of ARMS
    Santa does exist and His name is Not the EVIL Hypocrite FEINSTEIN
    Of course GOD and my running conversations we have might get a little more personal , but Hey we all have to pay a price.

    For every action , there is an equal but opposite reaction.

  2. Hmmm… Let’s see, not on the Senate Banking Committee. Ah, but Chuck Schumer from New York is ! What is Mr. Schumer’s stand gun control ? Exactly. Wake up America.

  3. super article. I was chilled at the part of their Monopoly of Power. State and Federal law enforcement are not put in place to protect the people, they are there to protect the corrupt governments. It is in the bill of rights that we the people have the right to protect ourselves from these very law enforcers, however the corruption of the governments do not want us to know this, so they hide it, twist it and ignore it. You are so right that now is the time for us to hollar loud and clear that we will fight for our rights.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.