Serious Question here… What if….

Nobody want’s to say it, hell nobody even want’s to think it, but… what if the Obama victory on Nov. 6th genuinely was a result of intentional Democrat voter Fraud? Why am I asking, is it just because I am a bitter clinger who can’t accept that Obama won reelection? Perhaps that’s true, but it’s also because, well the number really just do not add up. Ok, yea, I know I’m not a “Professional Blogger” or a member of the Fifth Column Treasonous Media, so yes I am daring to ask a question here no self respecting “Professional Blogger” or a member of the Fifth Column Treasonous Media would.

Here is some facts about the udervote:

2012 Florida, Obama received 20,158 more votes than in 2008. Romney
received 173,867 more than McCain did in 2008. No undervote for either.

2012 Virginia, Obama received 73,182 less votes than in 2008. Romney
was plus 46,249. Undervote for Obama, overvote for Romney.

In 2012 Ohio, Obama received 11,377 less votes than in 2008. Romney was plus 91,932. Undervote for Obama, overvote for Romney.

In New Hampshire, Obama received 17,260 less votes than in 2008. Romney was plus 9,744.

The under vote came from deep blue states. not swing states.

I haven’t seen anyone ask this yet, so I will: did the Ron Paul Revolution stay home last night?

Mitt Romney won 3 million votes less than McCain while Obama lost 10 million votes of his own from 2008.

Where did those 3 million McCain voters go?

The main part of why I believed Romney would win this time because I knew the 10 million Obama supporters would sit home…but never in my worst nightmares did I imagine McCain voters would sit home. I counted on them to show up and bring friends this time to boot Obama out.

Only 51.56% of L.A. County voters cast their votes in 2012, compared to 65.6% in 2008, and 67.9% in 2004. Barack Obama received 700,000 fewer votes in 2012 than 2008, and got 300,000 fewer votes in the county than John Kerry did in 2004. Demographic changes overall have benefited Democrats, who are now more than 50% of county voter registration. Millennials ages 18-29 registered to vote in record numbers in L.A. County this year, largely due to new online voter registration.

But vote comparisons over the past three elections don’t seem to show that these new registered voters turned out to vote. For the record, Mitt Romney cratered in L.A. County also, with 350,000 fewer votes than McCain earned in 2008, and 413,000 fewer than Bush in 2004.

Vote fraud alert: One out of five registered Ohio voters is bogus

Vote fraud is no big deal, right? It hardly ever happens. It’s so rare that it’s not even worth discussing. Anyone who claims to take the integrity of our ballots seriously is cynically exploiting phantom fears for the purpose of suppressing the Democrat-loving minority vote.

To keep that silly narrative alive, it’s important not to read the Sunday edition of the Columbus Dispatch, in which readers were informed that “more than one out of every five registered Ohio voters is probably ineligible to vote.”

Furthermore, “in two counties, the number of registered voters actually exceeds the voting age population: Northwestern Ohio’s Wood County shows 109 registered voters for every 100 eligible, while in Lawrence County along the Ohio River it’s a mere 104 registered per 100 eligible.”

31 more counties report over 90 percent voter registration, which is a good 20 percent higher than the national average. The Buckeye State sure is civic-minded! Well, except that 1.6 million of the 7.8 million registered voters in the state haven’t voted in at least four years. So I guess they were civic minded, once upon a time. Never fear – I’m sure plenty of those “inactive” voters will reactivate themselves just in time for Barack Obama’s re-election.

You might think these astonishing statistics indicate a crisis-level voter registration problem requiring immediate attention, particularly since this is 2012, not 1912, and modern technology gives us extremely potent tools for accurately managing massive amounts of data. But Attorney General Eric Holder disagrees. Ohio Secretary of State Jon Husted sent Holder a letter back in February, warning that “common sense says that the odds of voter fraud increase the longer these ineligible voters are allowed to populate our rolls… I simply cannot accept that.” Husted said existing federal regulations “limit Ohio’s ability to remove ineligible names, thereby increasing the chance for voter fraud.”

No one from the Justice Department ever responded. Conservative watchdog group Judicial Watch, which called Ohio’s voter registration train wreck to Husted’s attention, is now suing him for failing to take action, beyond issuing a “directive” to remove ineligible voters that Judicial Watch describes as “all bark and no bite,” since there is no evidence that anything was actually done.

Judicial Watch has already filed a similar lawsuit against the State of Indiana, and says other states with disturbing levels of ineligible registered voters include Mississippi, Iowa, Missouri, Texas, Pennsylvania, West Virginia, Florida, Alabama, California, and Colorado. Florida’s struggle to clean up its rolls, in the face of active hostility from Eric Holder’s Justice Department, has already made headlines.

Nationwide, the Pew Center for the States estimates about 24 million ineligible voter registrations, including “more than 1.8 million dead people listed as voters; about 2.75 million with voter registrations in more than one state; and about 12 million voter records with incorrect addresses, meaning either the voters moved or errors in the information make it unlikely any mailings can reach them.”

Military Vote Missing This Election — Including In Big Swing States

Under the Military and Overseas Voter Empowerment Act (or MOVE Act), which was signed into law in 2009, the FVAP is supposed to assist service members with voting on military installations. This includes providing military members with voter information forms when they check in to a duty station, similar to the “motor voter” programs civilians see at DMV offices.

But a U.S. Department of Defense Inspector General report released in August found that FVAP hadn’t set up those voter assistance offices—in part because of funding problems, but also because of resistance from the Department of Defense. After the report came out, Republican Texas Sen. John Cornyn wrote a letter to Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta demanding better voter assistance for the troops.

Cast aside: Thousands of votes from our military troops uncounted or missing

According to the Naval Enlisted Reserve Association, scores of military absentee ballots cast in the 2012 Election will not be counted. U.S. Military personnel and their families are outraged: “Where the hell is this country’s moral compass?!” stated the mother of a 25 year old Marine who served in Afghanistan.

The military mail service is notoriously slow, and lawmakers have said that it could be almost two months after the election before ballots even arrive to be processed.

“We write to express concerns over another serious failure by the Department of Defense to safeguard the voting rights of our overseas military service members, which we believe could result in the imminent disenfranchisement of thousands,” stated a letter sent to Defense Department Secretary Leon Panetta by Sens. John Cornyn, R-Texas, Kelly Ayotte, R-N.H., John McCain, R-Ariz., Rob Portman, R-Ohio, and Marco Rubio, R-Fla..

Add to that the incident on October 19th, just two and a half weeks before the November 6th elections, when a transport plane crashed at Shindad Air Base, destroying almost 5,000 pounds of mail – including absentee ballots being sent to U.S. military serving in Afghanistan. Election officials recommended resending the ballots – just two and a half weeks before the elections (bears repeating).

Thousands of military absentee ballots are being lost

A curiously large percentage of military absentee ballots are going AWOL, according to the Virginia Watchdog. In fact, ballot requests have seen a 92 percent decline, during one of the most high-profile elections in recent history. Coincidence? The Virginia Watchdog investigates:

A 92 percent drop in absentee-ballot requests by military personnel in Virginia is raising concerns that the Pentagon is failing to carry out a federal voting law.

With only 1,746 military voters in Virginia requesting absentee ballots so far this year — out of 126,251 service members in the state —the Military Voter Protection Project says the system has broken down.

It sounds like there has been a massive mishandling of paperwork for voters in the military. Just the fact that there are 124, 505 fewer absentee ballots requests in the system suggests that something has gone terribly wrong. How does one lose voting paperwork from over 120,000 members of the armed forces? That’s a good question.

Ok, so let’s put aside the question of whether it’s bitter sour grapes to ask whether Obama won through outright voter fraud, and ask the far more important question. What would be the legal course of action that would be taken if such an allegation were to be proven? And how could that course of action be instigated with the Democrat party being so firmly entrenched in the Department of Justice. Is there one single person in America that can honestly say they believe that Erick Holder would ever allow any legal action to be instigated? Or that Harry Reid would every allow the Senate to convene hearings on the matter?

If the Democrats did indeed employ the most wide spread and massive voter fraud in American history, what could, or dare I ask, would the Republican Party do about it?


16 thoughts on “Serious Question here… What if….

  1. While not excusing DOD’s inaction on voter assistance, when I was in the military and overseas I wrote or contacted my state or local election office directly to insure that I could vote. One time I even paid the postage on my ballot so that it could have a post office date stamp on it which it would not have had if I had just used the franking. (I heard that a lack of date stamp was one of the ways ballots were cast aside in the 2000 Florida election.)

  2. Pingback: Obama's Second Term

  3. I spent a little bit of time with some of the key swing states and some of the close states. In many cases, less than 100,000 fraudulent/extra votes would have had to been cast to change the outcome of those states. In some of the very close states, much fewer than 100K votes. Take a few liberal hubs like Philadelphia and Pittsburgh, along with a few outlying liberal counties and it wouldn’t be that hard to manufacture those votes. Thing is, if you subtract those few states and add them to Romney, Romney wins.

    /Sour grapes? Nope, this whole thing doesn’t pass the laugh test. Jugears eked out a 2.5% win, too close to the margin of fraud.

  4. Here’s a little math, 3,000,000 votes seperated Obama and Romney in the popular vote.

    There are only 3,033 counties in America.

    Here’s a little theory: Democrats would only have to fraudulently cast less then a 1,000 votes per county to win the popular vote. Every county would be different, some less than a thousand and some more. But the popular vote isn’t what counts. The Dems only had to win a handful of swing states to win the electoral college.

    Given the pushback by Dems to make sure “one person one vote” never becomes a reality, ask youselfs in your heart, how hard would it be for a few dedicated partisan hacks to commit fraud? Reading the comments of leftwing sites has opened my eyes, nothing is beneath them.

    One fact the dems are well aware of, is that every election there is a % of people that don’t cast ballots. This gives the dems a % of ballots to magically appear in the trunk of a poll workers car. Or ooops, here was a box of absentee ballots just sitting in the corner, can’t forget to count those wink wink.

    How hard would it be to bus people you were giving handouts too, to a different couple polling places on election day, a little vote here, a little vote there, vote early, vote often!

    Is there honestly a system in place to detect voter fraud? If the dems are so sure there isn’t voter fraud, then what was all the hubub about the 2000 election recounts? We have been played America.

  5. “Where did those 3 million McCain voters go?”

    Simple answer: they may have died. That’s actually a serious answer, even though it seems like a joke. The electorate is always changing–young people turn 18; older people die. We know the Republican vote skews older and the GOP wins a huge portion of the elderly. On the other hand, young people simply don’t vote GOP. Your voters could be literally dying. Maybe not quite 5% of McCain’s vote—but if you crunch the actuarial tables and the 2008 exit polls, you may be surprised by the expected mortality rate in 4 years for the McCain vote. An inconvenient truth

  6. There is no way 3 million less cme out this time than in 08. Look at romney’s crowedsm the voter enthusiasm in the polls, the long long lines at the polls. I smell a rat. Seriously, something is wrong and i hope someone is counting the machines and doing an inventory. No republican would sit this one out that came out in 08.

  7. I feel like we had enough GOP lawyers and observers on the ground to know if that sort of massive conspiracy were to have taken place. I’m not saying it’s wrong to ask, but I will say that we may have some better answers as to where the three million votes went in a few weeks. I don’t deny that there was fraud going on, I hope those people involved in the recorded incidents do hard time.

    That said…with all the unemployment in this country you have go to think that it’s hit a lot of the same people who voted for McCain. What if the Republican party as a whole is harder hit than we know? What if more Republicans are on welfare and unemployment and are too afraid to vote against their own self-interest even they though despise President Obama’s policies?

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.