Obama the coward had nothing to do with killing Osama Bin Laden, it was Leon Panetta who pulled the trigger.

The Whitehouse Insider has yanked the Obamanation Administrations covers and showed them to be cowards at the very minimum and traitors at the worst.
Valerie Jarrett and Barrack Obama refused time and time again to allow the US Military to take action against Osama Bin Laden, even when Gen. Petraeus threatened to take action on his own in direct disobedience to President Obama.

There can be little doubt with these stunning revelations that Obama was either protecting Osama Bin Laden, or planning to wait until October 2012 to have Bin Laden killed for political purposes. Either way any suggestion that Obama deserves any credit whatsoever in the death of Osama bin Laden is shown to be totally and utterly unfounded and a direct contradiction of the actual facts.

White House Insider: Obama Hesitated – Panetta Issued Order to Kill Osama Bin Laden

Q: You stated that President Obama was “overruled” by military/intelligence officials regarding the decision to send in military specialists into the Osama Bin Laden compound. Was that accurate?

A: I was told – in these exact terms, “we overruled him.” (Obama) I have since followed up and received further details on exactly what that meant, as well as the specifics of how Leon Panetta worked around the president’s “persistent hesitation to act.” There appears NOT to have been an outright overruling of any specific position by President Obama, simply because there was no specific position from the president to do so. President Obama was, in this case, as in all others, working as an absentee president.

Q: What changed the president’s position and enabled the attack against Osama Bin Laden to proceed?

A: Nothing changed with the president’s opinion – he continued to avoid having one. Every time military and intelligence officials appeared to make progress in forming a position, Jarrett would intervene and the stalling would begin again. Hillary started the ball really rolling as far as pressuring Obama began, but it was Panetta and Petraeus who ultimately pushed Obama to finally act – sort of. Panetta was receiving significant reports from both his direct CIA sources, as well as Petraeus-originating Intel. Petraeus was threatening to act on his own via a bombing attack. Panetta reported back to the president that a bombing of the compound would result in successful killing of Osama Bin Laden, and little risk to American lives. Initially, as he had done before, the president indicated a willingness to act. But once again, Jarrett intervened, convincing the president that innocent Pakistani lives could be lost in such a bombing attack, and Obama would be left attempting to explain Panetta’s failed policy. Again Obama hesitated – this time openly delaying further meetings to discuss the issue with Panetta. A brief meeting was held at this time with other officials, including Secretary Gates and members of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, but Gates, like Panetta, was unable to push the president to act. It was at this time that Gates indicated to certain Pentagon officials that he may resign earlier than originally indicated – he was that frustrated. Both Panetta and Clinton convinced him to stay on and see the operation through.

What happened from there is what was described by me as a “masterful manipulation” by Leon Panetta. Panetta indicated to Obama that leaks regarding knowledge of Osama Bin Laden’s location were certain to get out sooner rather than later, and action must be taken by the administration or the public backlash to the president’s inaction would be “…significant to the point of political debilitation.” It was at that time that Obama stated an on-ground campaign would be far more acceptable to him than a bombing raid. This was intended as a stalling tactic, and it had originated from Jarrett. Such a campaign would take both time, and present a far greater risk of failure. The president had been instructed by Jarrett to inform Mr., Panetta that he would have sole discretion to act against the Osama Bin Laden compound. Jarrett believed this would further delay Panetta from acting, as the responsibility for failure would then fall almost entirely on him. What Valerie Jarrett, and the president, did not know is that Leon Panetta had already initiated a program that reported to him –and only him, involving a covert on the ground attack against the compound. Basically, the whole damn operation was already ready to go – including the specific team support Intel necessary to engage the enemy within hours of being given notice. Panetta then made plans to proceed with an on-ground assault. This information reached either Hillary Clinton or Robert Gates first (likely via military contacts directly associated with the impending mission) who then informed the other. Those two then met with Panetta, who informed each of them he had been given the authority by the president to proceed with a mission if the opportunity presented itself. Both Gates and Clinton warned Panetta of the implications of that authority – namely he was possibly being made into a scapegoat. Panetta admitted that possibility, but felt the opportunity to get Bin Laden outweighed that risk. During that meeting, Hillary Clinton was first to pledge her full support for Panetta, indicating she would defend him if necessary. Similar support was then followed by Gates. The following day, and with Panetta’s permission, Clinton met in private with Bill Daley and urged him to get the president’s full and open approval of the Panetta plan. Daley agreed such approval would be of great benefit to the action, and instructed Clinton to delay proceeding until he had secured that approval. Daley contacted Clinton within hours of their meeting indicating Jarrett refused to allow the president to give that approval. Daley then informed Clinton that he too would fully support Panetta in his actions, even if it meant disclosing the president’s indecision to the American public should that action fail to produce a successful conclusion. Clinton took that message back to Panetta and the CIA director initiated the 48 hour engagement order. At this point, the President of the United States was not informed of the engagement order – it did not originate from him, and for several hours after the order had been given and the special ops forces were preparing for action into Pakistan from their position in Afghanistan, Daley successfully kept Obama and Jarrett insulated from that order.

No matter how you look at this, Obama acted in a manner that clearly was not in the interests of the United States of America. It was Gen. Petraeus and Leon Panetta who proved that they were the trustworthy servant’s of the People of the United States of America, not Valerie Jarrett and Barrack Obama, who at the very best could be said to be acting in their own selfish interests and at worst were protecting Osama Bin Laden and committing treason against the United States.


10 thoughts on “Obama the coward had nothing to do with killing Osama Bin Laden, it was Leon Panetta who pulled the trigger.

  1. Obama wrote a statement 7 days after the 9/11 event sympathizing with muslim extremists and blaming America for inciting hate against itself. He gave a speech for Ramadan but not for Easter. Obama went around the world after inauguration apologizing for ‘so-called’ American arrogance and warmongering. How can anyone not see that his allegiance is to Islam. This isn’t the only place I’ve heard this story. Knowing Obama’s record of cowardice and political maneuvering, its easy to believe. I’ve also heard unconfirmed stories that he gave muslims 22 Navy Seals as compensation for killing the highly adored Osama bin Ladin. As for all the other peaceful, tolerant muslims who just want to build more mosques, I remember you celebrating the deaths on 9/11.

  2. I can hardly believe the nonsense I’m reading here. None of you authoring this crap or posting response were “in the room.” Nor was I, for that matter.

    Every person that comes into power, whether it is the office manager, the mayor, or other…has the empirical notion of what the job is ALL about, the campaign on it, the rake the opposition with it. But when they are actually the “person in the chair” it turns out to be NOT what they expected AT ALL.

    Yeah, I believe that there can be, has been, and will be some “funny stuff” that goes on in politics…let’s not be naive.
    There will always be conspiracy theories. Always.

    But you are so wound around the pinkies of the manipulators that you are becoming part of the problem.

    Give me a break! You are MISSING the MOST IMPORTANT part of this…Bin Laden is dead. WE (Americans) succeeded. Relish it, be satisfied, get over yourselves.

    I don’t frequent this site, I had the link referred to me (by a known bigot.)

    • Oh, I am not missing the big picture here at all. I am offended that Obama claimed credit for something he didn’t do, that he put the members of SEAL team 6 at risk by identifying them as the military operatives that killed Bin Laden and that his Department of Justice is prosecuting the CIA agents that provided the actionable information that made killing Bin Laden possible.

  3. Hmmm….wishing for the death of our President, accusing the CIA and the Navy Seals of high treason, and showing an utter willful ignorance on the chain of command based on an unsubstantiated, unverified, unsourced internet rumor. How patriotic.

    • Yes, I believe that anyone who knowingly and willingly commits treason should be tried and executed, if you have a problem with that then you are just another worthless Marxist scumball. The CIA and the Navy Seals did not commit treason, they were acting under a executive order issued by President Bush that was never rescinded. In other-words, legally, morally and ethically speaking, they did not need Obama’s permission, they were already under orders to find and kill Osama Bin Laden.

      • Dude, I’m speechless–you’re so filled with hate that you can’t see straight! YOU are what’s wrong with this country. It’s YOU that’s going to bring this country to its knees. Xenophobia, racism, homogenizer, an inordinate sense of superiority and “patriotism,” — you name it! How do you live with so much rot inside you?

  4. “not Valerie Jarrett and Barrack Obama, who at the very best could be said to be acting in their own selfish interests and at worst were protecting Osama Bin Laden and committing treason against the United States.”
    BOTH – for sure.

    Impeachment and removal, followed by a criminal trial and hanging.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.