The New Throbbing Memo? Say it isn’t so…

A video has shown up on Youtube already, deconstruction the Obama Birth Certificate as a forgery. The question now is, to find out if it is indeed a forgery as this video claims, and then more importantly to take this video and the Dan Rather throbbing memo and stick them in the Fifth Column Treasonous Media’s face and dare them to claim they have never tried to pass off a blatant forgery on the American people as the genuine article before.

Who has that kind of courage these days? It sure as hell isn’t anyone in the GOP Leadership, they would rather loose to Obama than allow someone like Sarah Palin or Donald Trump to win as a Republican? Allapundit or Ed Morrissey of Not on your life, their too busy trying to become the new Dan Rather. Andrew Breitbart? I wouldn’t count on it, he’s courageous and ballsy, but I doubt he is that ballsy. So who is there with the courage to take this to the American people? Probably nobody, and so a forged document is accepted as genuine. Is it any wonder that most American’s today neither trust the US Government nor the Mainstream Media?

Edit: I would also like to point out something fishy noticed by Bagua over at, in 1961 Obama’s father’s race would not have been designated as African, remember the times people, in 1961 he would have been classified as a Negro. You can scream racism all you want for us pointing that out, but it is how things were done back then.

Edit: Looks like The Smoking Gun has some pretty serious questions to ask about this purported document too.

Edit: I’m adding another video…


11 thoughts on “The New Throbbing Memo? Say it isn’t so…

  1. Over and over this expert says that he would see these results IF a B&W scanner were used. Well, a B&W scanner was used, the color was already on the paper before the initial scan.

    B&W photocopier/printer, with color green safety paper….

  2. Also anyone who has actually filled out a birth certificate application form knows that the parent fills in the race for themselves. It is not multiple choice. The person, usually the father, fills in the form and sends it in to be typed and signed.

    You see the numbers hand written in pencil in some of the boxes? Those are done by someone to make the data entry more accurate and faster. So in this case, years later, someone went through and marked that for box 9 the data entry person should press 9 for African.

  3. Step one: The book is layed on a b&w photocopier.
    Step two: Security paper with the green pattern is inserted into the paper feed cartridge
    Step three: Press copy.
    Step four: take the b&w copy that was printed on the safety paper, and stamp and sign that it is a true copy.

    Step five:Send that to the Presidents lawyer, as per the written request.

    Step six: The Whitehouse (probably the webmaster) scans it into Adobe Acrobat Pro. Acrobat tries to be smart and does some OCR… just to recognize what might be characters. You might notice that the K in Kenya (#11) is missed by Acrobat because it is on the vertical line. Acrobat then automatically creates the layers.

    You should also notice when you remove the layers there is no green pattern under it. If the letters were inserted over the watermark, then when you remove them it would show the water mark under it.

      • I watched the video, and read the comments. What I describe explains their issues exactly. For example it explains the fuzziness where the b&w photocopier would have put the paper being copied onto the green safety paper, but not outside of the original image.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s